Boshara Andrew, Patel Ami, Alasaad Mohammad, Dutcheshen Karey J, LaLonde Thomas A, Schreiber Theodore L, Mehta Rajendra H, Kaki Amir, Rosman Howard S
Department of Cardiology, Ascension St. John Hospital, Detroit, MI.
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jun 11;3(6):e0447. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000447. eCollection 2021 Jun.
With percutaneous left ventricular mechanical circulatory support devices becoming increasingly available for patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction and the lack of a clear mortality benefit to date, identifying optimal candidates for this technology is crucial. We studied the effectiveness of Impella Cardiac Pow (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) in various stages of cardiogenic shock and elderly cohorts.
Retrospective review.
Data were collected for patients at a single community hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019.
Thirty-one consecutive adult patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction who received Impella Cardiac Pow support. Shock stages were defined by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (Stages A-E).
None.
The primary outcome was in-hospital death across Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention cardiogenic shock stages and in patients greater than or equal to 80 and less than 80 years old. Secondary outcomes were Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 vascular and bleeding complications, stroke, and renal failure requiring dialysis. The median age of the study population was 64 years, with seven patients (23%) being greater than or equal to 80 years old. No patients were in Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention Stage A, whereas there were seven in B, eight in C, six in D, and 10 (32%) in E. Overall in-hospital mortality occurred in 61% of patients. All 10 patients in Stage E died before hospital discharge. Mortality occurred in 54% of patients (13/24) age less than 80 years compared with 86% of those 80 years or older (6/7). A total of 38.7% of patients (12/31) and 32.3% of patients (10/31) experienced Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 bleeding and vascular events, which were evenly distributed across Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention cardiogenic shock Stages.
In conclusion, patients with shock in extremis and those 80 years old and older may have a prohibitively high mortality despite Impella use. These findings merit further prospective investigation in a larger number of patients to evaluate the effectiveness of Impella (and other left ventricular mechanical circulatory devices) and the inherent resource utilization in advanced cardiogenic shock and the elderly.
随着经皮左心室机械循环支持设备越来越多地应用于因急性心肌梗死导致心源性休克的患者,且目前尚无明确的死亡率获益,确定该技术的最佳适用患者至关重要。我们研究了Impella Cardiac Pow(Abiomed公司,马萨诸塞州丹弗斯)在不同阶段心源性休克患者及老年人群中的有效性。
回顾性研究。
收集了2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日期间一家社区医院患者的数据。
31例因急性心肌梗死导致心源性休克并接受Impella Cardiac Pow支持的成年连续患者。休克阶段由心血管造影和介入学会(A - E阶段)定义。
无。
主要结局是心血管造影和介入学会心源性休克各阶段以及年龄大于或等于80岁和小于80岁患者的院内死亡。次要结局是瓣膜学术研究联盟-2血管和出血并发症、中风以及需要透析的肾衰竭。研究人群的中位年龄为64岁,7例患者(23%)年龄大于或等于80岁。心血管造影和介入学会A阶段无患者,B阶段有7例,C阶段有8例,D阶段有6例,E阶段有10例(32%)。总体院内死亡率为61%。E阶段的所有10例患者均在出院前死亡。年龄小于80岁的患者死亡率为54%(13/24),而80岁及以上患者为86%(6/7)。共有38.7%的患者(12/31)和32.3%的患者(10/31)发生瓣膜学术研究联盟-2出血和血管事件,这些事件在心血管造影和介入学会心源性休克各阶段分布均匀。
总之,尽管使用了Impella,处于极度休克状态的患者以及80岁及以上的患者死亡率可能极高。这些发现值得在更多患者中进行进一步的前瞻性研究,以评估Impella(以及其他左心室机械循环设备)的有效性以及晚期心源性休克和老年患者中固有的资源利用情况。