• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情境模型中组间效应与组内效应的分解

The Decomposition of Between and Within Effects in Contextual Models.

作者信息

Guo Siwen, Houang Richard T, Schmidt William H

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.

Center for the Study of Curriculum Policy, Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology & Special Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:541803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.541803. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.541803
PMID:34149486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8209427/
Abstract

In contextual studies, group compositions are often extracted from individual data in the sample, in order to estimate the group compositional effects [e.g., school socioeconomic status (SES) effect] controlling for interindividual differences in multilevel models. As the same variable is used at both group level and individual level, an appropriate decomposition of between and within effects is a key to providing a clearer picture of these organizational and individual processes. The current study developed a new approach with within-group finite population correction (fpc). Its performances were compared with the manifest and latent aggregation approaches in the decomposition of between and within effects. Under a moderate within-group sampling ratio, the between effect estimates from the new approach had a lesser degree of bias and higher observed coverage rates compared with those from the manifest and latent aggregation approaches. A real data application was also used to illustrate the three analysis approaches.

摘要

在情境研究中,群组构成通常从样本中的个体数据中提取,以便在多层模型中控制个体间差异时估计群组构成效应[例如,学校社会经济地位(SES)效应]。由于同一变量在群组层面和个体层面都被使用,对组间效应和组内效应进行适当分解是更清晰地呈现这些组织和个体过程的关键。本研究开发了一种新的组内有限总体校正(fpc)方法。在组间效应和组内效应的分解中,将其性能与显性和隐性聚合方法进行了比较。在适度的组内抽样率下,与显性和隐性聚合方法相比,新方法的组间效应估计偏差较小,观察覆盖率较高。还通过一个实际数据应用来说明这三种分析方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a26/8209427/9259ea6fbabe/fpsyg-12-541803-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a26/8209427/733e44e589ca/fpsyg-12-541803-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a26/8209427/091e4b1585e3/fpsyg-12-541803-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a26/8209427/9259ea6fbabe/fpsyg-12-541803-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a26/8209427/733e44e589ca/fpsyg-12-541803-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a26/8209427/091e4b1585e3/fpsyg-12-541803-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a26/8209427/9259ea6fbabe/fpsyg-12-541803-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Decomposition of Between and Within Effects in Contextual Models.情境模型中组间效应与组内效应的分解
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:541803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.541803. eCollection 2021.
2
Doubly-Latent Models of School Contextual Effects: Integrating Multilevel and Structural Equation Approaches to Control Measurement and Sampling Error.学校情境效应的双重潜在模型:整合多层次和结构方程方法以控制测量和抽样误差。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2009 Nov 30;44(6):764-802. doi: 10.1080/00273170903333665.
3
A 2 × 2 taxonomy of multilevel latent contextual models: accuracy-bias trade-offs in full and partial error correction models.2×2 多层次潜在语境模型分类:完全和部分错误纠正模型中的准确性-偏差权衡。
Psychol Methods. 2011 Dec;16(4):444-67. doi: 10.1037/a0024376. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
4
The multilevel latent covariate model: a new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies.多层次潜在协变量模型:情境研究中群体层面效应的一种新的、更可靠的方法。
Psychol Methods. 2008 Sep;13(3):203-29. doi: 10.1037/a0012869.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Modeling contextual effects using individual-level data and without aggregation: an illustration of multilevel factor analysis (MLFA) with collective efficacy.使用个体层面数据且不进行汇总来建模情境效应:以集体效能的多层次因素分析(MLFA)为例
Popul Health Metr. 2015 May 10;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s12963-015-0045-1. eCollection 2015.
7
A Bayesian Approach to More Stable Estimates of Group-Level Effects in Contextual Studies.一种用于情境研究中更稳定估计群体水平效应的贝叶斯方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(6):688-705. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1090899.
8
Treating random effects as observed versus latent predictors: The bias-variance tradeoff in small samples.将随机效应视为观察到的与潜在预测因子:小样本中的偏差-方差权衡。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022 Feb;75(1):158-181. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12253. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
9
A Computationally More Efficient and More Accurate Stepwise Approach for Correcting for Sampling Error and Measurement Error.一种计算效率更高、更准确的逐步方法,用于校正抽样误差和测量误差。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):612-632. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1469086. Epub 2018 May 21.
10
Mediation from multilevel to structural equation modeling.从多层次模型到结构方程模型的中介作用。
Ann Nutr Metab. 2014;65(2-3):198-204. doi: 10.1159/000362505. Epub 2014 Nov 18.

本文引用的文献

1
The Impact of Intraclass Correlation on the Effectiveness of Level-Specific Fit Indices in Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling: A Monte Carlo Study.组内相关对多层结构方程模型中特定水平拟合指数有效性的影响:一项蒙特卡洛研究
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Jan;77(1):5-31. doi: 10.1177/0013164416642823. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
2
A Computationally More Efficient and More Accurate Stepwise Approach for Correcting for Sampling Error and Measurement Error.一种计算效率更高、更准确的逐步方法,用于校正抽样误差和测量误差。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 Sep-Oct;53(5):612-632. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1469086. Epub 2018 May 21.
3
Using iMCFA to Perform the CFA, Multilevel CFA, and Maximum Model for Analyzing Complex Survey Data.
使用综合多组验证性因子分析(iMCFA)进行验证性因子分析(CFA)、多水平CFA以及用于分析复杂调查数据的极大模型。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 13;9:251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00251. eCollection 2018.
4
Finite population correction for two-level hierarchical linear models.两层层次线性模型的有限总体校正。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Mar;23(1):94-112. doi: 10.1037/met0000137. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
5
Doubly-Latent Models of School Contextual Effects: Integrating Multilevel and Structural Equation Approaches to Control Measurement and Sampling Error.学校情境效应的双重潜在模型:整合多层次和结构方程方法以控制测量和抽样误差。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2009 Nov 30;44(6):764-802. doi: 10.1080/00273170903333665.
6
Latent Variable Modeling of Longitudinal and Multilevel Substance Use Data.纵向和多级物质使用数据的潜在变量建模
Multivariate Behav Res. 1997 Jul 1;32(3):275-318. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3203_3.
7
A Comparison of Single Sample and Bootstrap Methods to Assess Mediation in Cluster Randomized Trials.单样本法与自助法在整群随机试验中介导评估中的比较
Multivariate Behav Res. 2006 Sep 1;41(3):367-400. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_5.
8
Multilevel SEM Strategies for Evaluating Mediation in Three-Level Data.多层次 SEM 策略在三级数据中介效应评估中的应用
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 Jul 29;46(4):691-731. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.589280.
9
A Bayesian Approach to More Stable Estimates of Group-Level Effects in Contextual Studies.一种用于情境研究中更稳定估计群体水平效应的贝叶斯方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(6):688-705. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1090899.
10
Multilevel structural equation models for assessing moderation within and across levels of analysis.多层次结构方程模型评估分析内和分析间的调节作用。
Psychol Methods. 2016 Jun;21(2):189-205. doi: 10.1037/met0000052. Epub 2015 Dec 14.