Suppr超能文献

放松敏感度指数的开发与初步验证

Development and Initial Validation of the Relaxation Sensitivity Index.

作者信息

Luberto Christina M, McLeish Alison C, Kallen Rachel W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, P.O. Box 210376, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0376, USA.

Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, 151 Merrimac St, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cogn Ther. 2021 Jun;14(2):320-340. doi: 10.1007/s41811-020-00086-3. Epub 2020 Sep 4.

Abstract

Relaxation sensitivity indexes the fear of relaxation-related events. The purpose of this study was to develop and provide initial validation of a self-report measure of relaxation sensitivity, the Relaxation Sensitivity Index (RSI). Three independent samples of undergraduate students (=300 unselected, =349 non-clinical, and =197 clinical analogs with elevated anxiety/depression symptoms) completed self-report measures to examine the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the RSI. Results of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a three-factor structure (correlated Physical, Cognitive, and Social Concerns). The RSI demonstrated good internal consistency and construct validity as evidenced by expected correlations with measures of anxiety and depression symptoms. The RSI showed good predictive validity in terms of a history of fearful responding to relaxation. RSI scores were significantly higher in the symptomatic compared to non-clinical sample. Results suggest the RSI is a valid and reliable measure that may be useful in clinical and research settings.

摘要

放松敏感性指对与放松相关事件的恐惧。本研究的目的是开发一种自我报告的放松敏感性测量工具——放松敏感性指数(RSI),并进行初步验证。三个独立的本科生样本(未筛选的300名、非临床的349名以及有焦虑/抑郁症状升高的197名临床模拟者)完成了自我报告测量,以检验RSI的因子结构、信度和效度。探索性和验证性因子分析结果支持三因子结构(相关的身体、认知和社会担忧)。RSI表现出良好的内部一致性和结构效度,这从与焦虑和抑郁症状测量的预期相关性中得到证明。就对放松产生恐惧反应的历史而言,RSI显示出良好的预测效度。与非临床样本相比,有症状样本的RSI得分显著更高。结果表明,RSI是一种有效且可靠的测量工具,可能在临床和研究环境中有用。

相似文献

1
Development and Initial Validation of the Relaxation Sensitivity Index.
Int J Cogn Ther. 2021 Jun;14(2):320-340. doi: 10.1007/s41811-020-00086-3. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
2
Validation of the Chinese Version of Relaxation Sensitivity Index: A Tool for Predicting Treatment Effect in Mindfulness Interventions.
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;9:809572. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.809572. eCollection 2021.
5
[The Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (FNE): psychometric properties of the French version].
Encephale. 2004 Nov-Dec;30(6):517-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95465-6.
7
Evaluation of the Psychometric and Structural Properties of the Spanish Version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in Latina Cancer Patients.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Aug;58(2):289-296.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 May 20.
8
Validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale in an acute psychiatric sample.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):456-64. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1802. Epub 2012 May 17.
10
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index for Children.
Psicothema. 2017 Aug;29(3):402-407. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2017.78.

引用本文的文献

1
Avoidance of negative emotional contrast from worry and rumination: An application of the Contrast Avoidance Model.
J Behav Cogn Ther. 2022 Mar;32(1):33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jbct.2021.12.007. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
2
Validation of the Chinese Version of Relaxation Sensitivity Index: A Tool for Predicting Treatment Effect in Mindfulness Interventions.
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;9:809572. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.809572. eCollection 2021.
3
Mechanistic Pathways of Mindfulness Meditation in Combat Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
J Clin Psychol. 2016 Apr;72(4):365-83. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22255. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
The Short Health Anxiety Inventory: Psychometric Properties and Construct Validity in a Non-clinical Sample.
Cognit Ther Res. 2007;31(6):871-883. doi: 10.1007/s10608-006-9058-1. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
3
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
4
Distortions In A Commonly Used Factor Analytic Procedure.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1979 Jul 1;14(3):301-21. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1403_2.
5
Factors Influencing Four Rules For Determining The Number Of Components To Retain.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1982 Apr 1;17(2):253-69. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1702_5.
6
Very Simple Structure: An Alternative Procedure For Estimating The Optimal Number Of Interpretable Factors.
Multivariate Behav Res. 1979 Oct 1;14(4):403-14. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_2.
7
Stress generation and exposure in a multi-wave study of adolescents: Transactional processes and sex differences.
J Soc Clin Psychol. 2013 Nov 1;32(9):989-1012. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2013.32.9.989.
10
The psychometric properties of the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills in clinical populations.
Assessment. 2010 Jun;17(2):220-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191109356525. Epub 2009 Dec 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验