• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

世界贸易中心救援人员的原话:基于人工智能的语言分析对访谈进行预测,以了解 PTSD 症状轨迹。

World Trade Center responders in their own words: predicting PTSD symptom trajectories with AI-based language analyses of interviews.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, New York, USA.

Program in Public Health, Stony Brook University, New York, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2023 Feb;53(3):918-926. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002294. Epub 2021 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1017/S0033291721002294
PMID:34154682
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8692489/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oral histories from 9/11 responders to the World Trade Center (WTC) attacks provide rich narratives about distress and resilience. Artificial Intelligence (AI) models promise to detect psychopathology in natural language, but they have been evaluated primarily in non-clinical settings using social media. This study sought to test the ability of AI-based language assessments to predict PTSD symptom trajectories among responders.

METHODS

Participants were 124 responders whose health was monitored at the Stony Brook WTC Health and Wellness Program who completed oral history interviews about their initial WTC experiences. PTSD symptom severity was measured longitudinally using the PTSD Checklist (PCL) for up to 7 years post-interview. AI-based indicators were computed for depression, anxiety, neuroticism, and extraversion along with dictionary-based measures of linguistic and interpersonal style. Linear regression and multilevel models estimated associations of AI indicators with concurrent and subsequent PTSD symptom severity (significance adjusted by false discovery rate).

RESULTS

Cross-sectionally, greater depressive language ( = 0.32; = 0.049) and first-person singular usage ( = 0.31; = 0.049) were associated with increased symptom severity. Longitudinally, anxious language predicted future worsening in PCL scores ( = 0.30; = 0.049), whereas first-person plural usage ( = -0.36; = 0.014) and longer words usage ( = -0.35; = 0.014) predicted improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate the value of AI in understanding PTSD in a vulnerable population. Future studies should extend this application to other trauma exposures and to other demographic groups, especially under-represented minorities.

摘要

背景

来自世界贸易中心(WTC)袭击事件的 9/11 响应者的口述历史提供了有关痛苦和适应力的丰富叙述。人工智能(AI)模型有望在自然语言中检测出精神病理学,但它们主要在使用社交媒体的非临床环境中进行了评估。本研究旨在测试基于 AI 的语言评估在预测响应者 PTSD 症状轨迹方面的能力。

方法

参与者是 124 名在 Stony Brook WTC 健康与健康计划中接受监测的响应者,他们完成了有关其最初 WTC 经历的口述历史访谈。使用 PTSD 检查表(PCL)在访谈后长达 7 年的时间内对 PTSD 症状严重程度进行了纵向测量。计算了基于 AI 的抑郁、焦虑、神经质和外向性指标以及基于词典的语言和人际风格指标。线性回归和多层次模型估计了 AI 指标与并发和随后的 PTSD 症状严重程度之间的关联(通过虚假发现率进行调整)。

结果

在横截面分析中,更多的抑郁性语言( = 0.32; = 0.049)和第一人称单数用法( = 0.31; = 0.049)与症状严重程度增加有关。纵向分析表明,焦虑性语言预示着 PCL 评分的未来恶化( = 0.30; = 0.049),而第一人称复数用法( = -0.36; = 0.014)和更长的单词用法( = -0.35; = 0.014)预示着改善。

结论

这是第一项证明 AI 在理解弱势群体中 PTSD 方面具有价值的研究。未来的研究应将这种应用扩展到其他创伤暴露和其他人群,尤其是代表性不足的少数族裔。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/635d/9975963/4369c82396d9/S0033291721002294_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/635d/9975963/351c488e36d7/S0033291721002294_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/635d/9975963/4369c82396d9/S0033291721002294_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/635d/9975963/351c488e36d7/S0033291721002294_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/635d/9975963/4369c82396d9/S0033291721002294_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
World Trade Center responders in their own words: predicting PTSD symptom trajectories with AI-based language analyses of interviews.世界贸易中心救援人员的原话:基于人工智能的语言分析对访谈进行预测,以了解 PTSD 症状轨迹。
Psychol Med. 2023 Feb;53(3):918-926. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721002294. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
2
DSM-IV post-traumatic stress disorder among World Trade Center responders 11-13 years after the disaster of 11 September 2001 (9/11).2001年9月11日(9·11)灾难发生11至13年后世贸中心救援人员中的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版创伤后应激障碍
Psychol Med. 2016 Mar;46(4):771-83. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002184. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
3
Risk, coping and PTSD symptom trajectories in World Trade Center responders.世贸中心救援人员的风险、应对方式与创伤后应激障碍症状轨迹
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Nov;82:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
4
Trajectories of PTSD risk and resilience in World Trade Center responders: an 8-year prospective cohort study.世贸中心救援人员创伤后应激障碍风险和韧性的轨迹:一项为期 8 年的前瞻性队列研究。
Psychol Med. 2014 Jan;44(1):205-19. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713000597. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
5
Dimensional structure and course of post-traumatic stress symptomatology in World Trade Center responders.世贸中心救援人员创伤后应激症状的维度结构及病程
Psychol Med. 2014 Jul;44(10):2085-98. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713002924. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
6
Handgrip Strength of World Trade Center (WTC) Responders: The Role of Re-Experiencing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Symptoms.世贸中心(WTC)救援人员的握力:再体验创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;16(7):1128. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071128.
7
Latent typologies of posttraumatic stress disorder in World Trade Center responders.世贸中心救援人员创伤后应激障碍的潜在类型
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 Dec;83:151-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
8
Posttraumatic stress symptoms and smoking among World Trade Center disaster responders: A longitudinal investigation.创伤后应激症状与世贸中心灾难救援人员的吸烟行为:一项纵向研究。
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;63:46-54. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
9
Posttraumatic stress disorder and the risk of respiratory problems in World Trade Center responders: longitudinal test of a pathway.世贸中心救援人员的创伤后应激障碍与呼吸问题风险:一条路径的纵向测试
Psychosom Med. 2015 May;77(4):438-48. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000179.
10
The Burden of Subthreshold Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in World Trade Center Responders in the Second Decade After 9/11.9/11 后第 2 个 10 年世贸中心救援人员亚临床创伤后应激障碍的负担。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 21;81(1):19m12881. doi: 10.4088/JCP.19m12881.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between language features and PTSD symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.语言特征与创伤后应激障碍症状之间的关系:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 31;16:1476978. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1476978. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring Biases of Large Language Models in the Field of Mental Health: Comparative Questionnaire Study of the Effect of Gender and Sexual Orientation in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa Case Vignettes.探索大语言模型在心理健康领域的偏差:神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症病例 vignettes 中性别和性取向影响的比较问卷调查研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Mar 20;12:e57986. doi: 10.2196/57986.
3
Beyond trauma: a review of content and linguistic characteristics of nontrauma narratives in posttraumatic stress disorder.
超越创伤:创伤后应激障碍中非创伤性叙述的内容和语言特征综述。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2407733. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2407733. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
4
An overview of diagnostics and therapeutics using large language models.使用大型语言模型的诊断和治疗方法概述。
J Trauma Stress. 2024 Oct;37(5):754-760. doi: 10.1002/jts.23082. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
5
Interdisciplinary approach to identify language markers for post-traumatic stress disorder using machine learning and deep learning.采用跨学科方法,利用机器学习和深度学习技术识别创伤后应激障碍的语言标志物。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 30;14(1):12468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61557-7.
6
Robust language-based mental health assessments in time and space through social media.通过社交媒体在时间和空间上进行基于语言的强大心理健康评估。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 May 2;7(1):109. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01100-0.
7
Beyond rating scales: With targeted evaluation, large language models are poised for psychological assessment.超越评分量表:通过有针对性的评估,大语言模型有望用于心理评估。
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Mar;333:115667. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115667. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
8
Natural language processing for mental health interventions: a systematic review and research framework.自然语言处理在心理健康干预中的应用:系统评价与研究框架
Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 6;13(1):309. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02592-2.
9
The where and when of COVID-19: Using ecological and Twitter-based assessments to examine impacts in a temporal and community context.新冠疫情的时空动态:利用生态和基于推特的评估方法,在时间和社区背景下考察其影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 23;17(2):e0264280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264280. eCollection 2022.
10
Detecting Presence of PTSD Using Sentiment Analysis From Text Data.利用文本数据中的情感分析检测创伤后应激障碍的存在
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 1;12:811392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.811392. eCollection 2021.