Brock University.
University of Alberta.
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2021 Jun 21;43(4):345-352. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2021-0031.
To better understand exercise-related cognitive errors (ECEs) from a dual processing perspective, the purpose of this study was to examine their relationship to two automatic exercise processes. It was hypothesized that ECEs would account for more variance than automatic processes in predicting intentions, that ECEs would interact with automatic processes to predict intentions, and that exercise schema would distinguish between different levels of ECEs. Adults (N = 136, Mage = 29 years, 42.6% women) completed a cross-sectional study and responded to three survey measures (ECEs, exercise self-schema, and exercise intentions) and two computerized implicit tasks (the approach/avoid task and single-category Implicit Association Test). ECEs were not correlated with the two implicit measures; however, ECEs moderated the relationship between approach tendency toward exercise stimuli and exercise intentions. Exercise self-schema were differentiated by ECE level. This study expands our knowledge of ECEs by examining their relationship to different automatic and reflective processes.
为了从双重加工的角度更好地理解与运动相关的认知错误（ECEs），本研究旨在检验它们与两种自动运动过程的关系。研究假设 ECEs 将比自动过程在预测意图方面解释更多的差异，ECEs 将与自动过程相互作用以预测意图，并且运动图式将区分不同水平的 ECEs。成年人（N=136，Mage=29 岁，42.6%女性）完成了一项横断面研究，并对三个调查测量（ECEs、运动自我图式和运动意图）和两个计算机化的内隐任务（接近/回避任务和单类别内隐联想测试）做出了回应。ECEs 与两个内隐测量不相关；然而，ECEs 调节了对运动刺激的接近倾向与运动意图之间的关系。运动自我图式根据 ECE 水平进行区分。这项研究通过检验 ECEs 与不同自动和反射过程的关系，扩展了我们对 ECEs 的认识。
