Pfeffer Ines, Strobach Tilo
Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Human Sciences, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 21;12:714608. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.714608. eCollection 2021.
In this study, we examined the interaction of automatic (i.e., automatic affective evaluations) and reflective [i.e., reflective intention and executive functions (EFs)] processes on physical activity (PA) behavior based on dual-process theories. We expected main effects as well as significant interaction effects between automatic associations, intention, and EFs on behavior. In particular, a well-controlled implicit-association-test (IAT) was applied to assess automatic affective evaluation. A prospective study with two points of measurement (=212 students) was conducted. At t1, age, sex, PA behavior (control variables), automatic associations, EFs (shifting, updating, inhibition), and PA intention (predictors and moderators) were assessed with standardized questionnaires and tests. At t2 (4weeks later), PA behavior (dependent variable) was measured with a standardized questionnaire. A hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis including two- and three-way interactions between IAT results, intention, and EFs on PA behavior was conducted. Results showed that the interactions Intention x Shifting and IAT x Intention x Inhibition were significant. Moderation analyses revealed that participants with higher intentions and lower inhibition values (improved inhibition abilities) showed a negative association between IAT and PA, while those with lower intentions and lower inhibition values showed a positive association between IAT and PA, which was documented in a significant slope difference test between these two groups. Thus, both automatic and reflective processes contribute and interact in predicting PA. As well as fostering more positive affective evaluations towards PA, interventions to strengthen PA intentions and to improve EFs could help to increase PA behavior.
在本研究中,我们基于双加工理论,考察了自动加工过程(即自动情感评价)与反思性加工过程[即反思性意图和执行功能(EFs)]对身体活动(PA)行为的交互作用。我们预期自动联想、意图和执行功能对行为会产生主效应以及显著的交互效应。具体而言,我们应用了一种严格控制的内隐联想测验(IAT)来评估自动情感评价。我们开展了一项有两个测量点的前瞻性研究(共212名学生)。在t1阶段,我们使用标准化问卷和测试评估了年龄、性别、PA行为(控制变量)、自动联想、执行功能(转换、更新、抑制)以及PA意图(预测变量和调节变量)。在t2阶段(4周后),我们使用标准化问卷测量了PA行为(因变量)。我们进行了分层多元线性回归分析,考察了IAT结果、意图和执行功能对PA行为的二阶和三阶交互作用。结果表明,意图×转换以及IAT×意图×抑制的交互作用显著。调节分析显示,意图较高且抑制值较低(抑制能力提高)的参与者,IAT与PA之间呈负相关,而意图较低且抑制值较低的参与者,IAT与PA之间呈正相关,这在两组之间的显著斜率差异检验中得到了证实。因此,自动加工过程和反思性加工过程在预测PA方面都有作用且相互影响。除了培养对PA更积极的情感评价外,加强PA意图和改善执行功能的干预措施可能有助于增加PA行为。