Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Quantitative Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jul;67(7):3138-3147. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07117-9. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
The efficacy and safety profile of ustekinumab (UST) in Crohn's disease (CD) is favorable; however, data in elderly patients are lacking. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of UST in elderly CD.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of CD patients classified as elderly (age ≥ 65 years at UST initiation) or nonelderly (<65 years) treated at a large, tertiary referral center. Outcomes assessed were clinical (measured by physician global assessment [PGA]) and steroid-free response, remission, adverse events, and postsurgical complications were compared by age category. Multivariable regression modeling and survival analysis was also performed.
In total, 117 patients (elderly n = 39, nonelderly n = 78) were included in the study. Elderly patients had predominantly moderate disease (87.2%), while nonelderly had a higher proportion of severe disease activity (44.9%) (p = 0.001), though no differences in baseline endoscopic activity, prior biologic use, or steroid or immunomodulator use at baseline existed (p > 0.05 all). While nearly 90% patients in both groups experienced clinical response to UST, compared to nonelderly, elderly patients were less likely to achieve complete clinical remission (28.2% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.01). On regression modeling, age was not associated with clinical outcomes (p > 0.05 all). Mucosal healing was achieved in 26% elderly and 30% nonelderly patients (p = 0.74). There were no significant differences in infusion reactions (2.6% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.77), infection (5.2% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.7), or postsurgical complications (p = 0.99) by age category.
UST is safe and effective in elderly CD. Although limited by sample size and retrospective design, such real-world data can inform biologic positioning in this IBD population.
乌司奴单抗(UST)在克罗恩病(CD)中的疗效和安全性良好;然而,老年人的数据尚缺乏。我们旨在评估 UST 在老年 CD 中的安全性和疗效。
我们对在一家大型三级转诊中心接受治疗的 CD 患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者分为老年(UST 起始时年龄≥65 岁)或非老年(<65 岁)。通过医生总体评估(PGA)评估临床(测量)和无类固醇应答、缓解、不良事件和术后并发症,并按年龄分类进行比较。还进行了多变量回归建模和生存分析。
总共纳入了 117 名患者(老年组 n=39,非老年组 n=78)。老年患者主要为中度疾病(87.2%),而非老年患者则有更高比例的严重疾病活动(44.9%)(p=0.001),尽管两组患者基线内镜活动、既往生物制剂使用、或基线时类固醇或免疫调节剂使用无差异(p>0.05)。虽然两组患者接受 UST 治疗后均有近 90%的患者获得临床应答,但与非老年患者相比,老年患者获得完全临床缓解的可能性较低(28.2% vs. 52.6%,p=0.01)。在回归模型中,年龄与临床结局无关(p>0.05)。26%的老年患者和 30%的非老年患者实现了黏膜愈合(p=0.74)。两组的输注反应(2.6% vs. 6.4%,p=0.77)、感染(5.2% vs. 7.7%,p=0.7)或术后并发症(p=0.99)均无显著差异。
UST 在老年 CD 中是安全且有效的。尽管受到样本量和回顾性设计的限制,但此类真实世界数据可以为该 IBD 人群中的生物制剂定位提供信息。