• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Humanism Scale Short Form: A cross-sectional study.《人本位量表短式韩文版的有效性和可靠性:一项横断面研究》。
Nurs Open. 2022 Nov;9(6):2690-2696. doi: 10.1002/nop2.968. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
2
Transcultural adaptation and validity of the nurse professional competence scale Korean version for graduating nursing students: An explanatory factor analysis.护理专业学生护士职业能力量表韩文版的跨文化调适与效度:解释性因素分析。
Nurs Open. 2023 Feb;10(2):579-590. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1324. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
3
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Holistic Nursing Competence Scale.《整体护理能力量表韩国版的有效性和可靠性》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 13;19(12):7244. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127244.
4
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Palliative Care Nursing Self-Competence scale for infant use.婴儿使用的韩文版姑息护理护理自我效能感量表的心理测量学特性。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Nov;36(6):1019-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.12.010. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
5
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the High-Performance Work System Scale (HPWS-K).《高绩效工作系统量表(HPWS-K)韩文版的信度和效度》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 21;19(20):13708. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013708.
6
[Validity and Reliability of the Peer Group Caring Interaction Scale-Korean Version].[同伴群体关怀互动量表韩语版的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016 Jun;46(3):431-42. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2016.46.3.431.
7
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Watson Caritas Patient Score.韩文版沃森关爱患者评分的效度与信度
J Nurs Res. 2020 Apr;28(2):e80. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000351.
8
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Social Justice Scale in Nursing Students.护理专业学生韩国版社会公正量表的信度和效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 4;19(21):14443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114443.
9
[A Validation Study of the Korean Version of the Jefferson Empathy Scale for Health Professionals for Korean Nurses].[韩国护士版韩国健康专业人员杰斐逊共情量表的验证研究]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2016 Apr;46(2):207-14. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2016.46.2.207.
10
Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short-Form in Cancer Patients.癌症患者应对与适应处理量表简版韩文版的信效度研究
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Jun;48(3):375-388. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.3.375.

引用本文的文献

1
Turkish psychometric characteristics of the humanistic practice ability of nursing scale: differences by education, working year, and professional satisfaction.护理量表人文实践能力的土耳其语心理测量学特征:按教育程度、工作年限和职业满意度的差异
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 1;23(1):448. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02083-9.
2
Mediating Effect of Humanism on the Relationship between Task Performance Competence and Holistic Nursing Competence for Clinical Nurses.人文关怀对临床护士任务绩效能力与整体护理能力关系的中介作用
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 6;11(13):1953. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131953.
3
Measurement of Humanity Among Health Professionals: Development and Validation of the Medical Humanity Scale Using the Delphi Method.医疗专业人员人文素养的测量:运用德尔菲法开发与验证医学人文量表
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 2;7:e44241. doi: 10.2196/44241.

本文引用的文献

1
Humanistic caring, a nursing competency: modelling a metamorphosis from students to accomplished nurses.人文关怀:从学生到成熟护士的蜕变。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Mar;35(1):196-207. doi: 10.1111/scs.12834. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
2
Development and validation of an instrument to measure nurses' compassion competence.一种测量护士同情能力的工具的开发与验证。
Appl Nurs Res. 2016 May;30:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
3
Humanism, compassion and the call to caring.人文主义、同情心与关爱之呼唤。
Med Educ. 2016 Mar;50(3):264-6. doi: 10.1111/medu.12961.
4
The legacy of altruism in health care: the promotion of empathy, prosociality and humanism.医疗保健中的利他主义传统:促进同理心、亲社会行为和人本主义。
Med Educ. 2012 Mar;46(3):317-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04159.x.
5
A concept analysis of person-centered care.以患者为中心的护理的概念分析
J Holist Nurs. 2012 Mar;30(1):6-15. doi: 10.1177/0898010111412189. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
6
Humanistic Nursing Theory: application to hospice and palliative care.人文护理理论:在临终关怀和姑息治疗中的应用。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Feb;68(2):471-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05770.x. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
7
Correction for multiple testing: is there a resolution?多重检验校正:是否有解决方案?
Chest. 2011 Jul;140(1):16-18. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0523.
8
Humanism and its critiques in nursing research literature.护理研究文献中的人文主义及其批判
J Adv Nurs. 2009 Jul;65(7):1560-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04956.x. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
9
Humanistic nursing, interpersonal relations theory, and the empathy-altruism hypothesis.人文护理、人际关系理论与共情-利他假说。
Nurs Sci Q. 2006 Oct;19(4):334-8. doi: 10.1177/0894318406292823.
10
Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient.测量同理心:同理心商数的信度与效度
Psychol Med. 2004 Jul;34(5):911-9. doi: 10.1017/s0033291703001624.

《人本位量表短式韩文版的有效性和可靠性:一项横断面研究》。

Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Humanism Scale Short Form: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Eulji University, Daejeon, Korea.

Department of Nursing, Joongbu University, Geumsan-gun, Korea.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2022 Nov;9(6):2690-2696. doi: 10.1002/nop2.968. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.968
PMID:34161663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9584488/
Abstract

AIM

To examine the reliability and validity of a Korean version of the Humanism Scale Short Form.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional descriptive design.

METHODS

This study involved 191 nurses in Korea. Data were collected from 1 May to 30 June 2019. Bilingual nursing professionals translated the scale into Korean, and reverse translation was performed. Validity and reliability were assessed, and the correlation coefficients of the developed scale were compared with those of the Korean version of the Empathy Quotient Scale and Compassion Competence Scale to evaluate concurrent validity.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis with 15 items showed that two factors (human equality and respect for human beings) explained 50.86% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was 0.88. Thus, the scale has acceptable reliability and validity. Humanism measures can predict a nurse's approach to holistic care and provide fundamental data for developing programs to improve integrated caring capacities.

摘要

目的

检验简化版人文关怀量表韩文版的信度和效度。

设计

横断面描述性设计。

方法

本研究纳入韩国的 191 名护士。数据收集于 2019 年 5 月 1 日至 6 月 30 日。双语护理专业人员将量表翻译为韩文,并进行反向翻译。评估了有效性和可靠性,并将开发量表的相关系数与韩文版同理心量表和同情心量表的相关系数进行了比较,以评估同时效度。

结果

采用 15 项进行的探索性因子分析显示,两个因素(人类平等和尊重人类)解释了 50.86%的方差。整体量表的克朗巴赫α系数为 0.88。因此,该量表具有可接受的信度和效度。人文关怀量表可以预测护士对整体护理的态度,并为开发提高综合护理能力的方案提供基本数据。