• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理机构中老年患者的亲密关系:一种需求、一项权利、一种特权——还是一种护理方式?

Intimacy for older adults in long-term care: a need, a right, a privilege-or a kind of care?

作者信息

Schouten Vanessa, Henrickson Mark, Cook Catherine M, McDonald Sandra, Atefi Nilo

机构信息

School of Humanities, Media and Communication, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand

School of Social Work, Massey University-Albany Campus, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 23. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107171.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2020-107171
PMID:34162736
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To investigate attitudes of staff, residents and family members in long-term care towards sex and intimacy among older adults, specifically the extent to which they conceptualise sex and intimacy as a need, a right, a privilege or as a component of overall well-being.

METHODS

The present study was a part of a two-arm mixed-methods cross-sectional study using a concurrent triangulation design. A validated survey tool was developed; 433 staff surveys were collected from 35 facilities across the country. Interviews were conducted with 75 staff, residents and family members.

RESULTS

It was common for staff, residents and family members to talk about intimacy and sexuality in terms of rights and needs. As well as using the language of needs and rights, it was common for participants to use terms related to well-being, such as fun, happiness or being miserable. One participant in particular (a staff member) described receiving intimate touch as a 'kind of care'-a particularly useful way of framing the conversation.

CONCLUSION

While staff, residents and family frequently used the familiar language of needs and rights to discuss access to intimate touch, they also used the language of well-being and care. Reframing the conversation in this way serves a useful purpose: it shifts the focus from simply meeting minimum obligations to a salutogenic approach-one that focuses on caring for the whole person in order to improve overall well-being and quality of life.

摘要

背景

调查长期护理机构中的工作人员、居民和家庭成员对老年人性与亲密关系的态度,特别是他们将性与亲密关系视为一种需求、一项权利、一种特权还是整体幸福感的一个组成部分的程度。

方法

本研究是一项采用并行三角测量设计的双臂混合方法横断面研究的一部分。开发了一种经过验证的调查工具;从全国35个机构收集了433份工作人员调查问卷。对75名工作人员、居民和家庭成员进行了访谈。

结果

工作人员、居民和家庭成员从权利和需求的角度谈论亲密关系和性是很常见的。除了使用需求和权利的语言外,参与者使用与幸福感相关的术语也很常见,如乐趣、幸福或痛苦。特别是一名参与者(一名工作人员)将接受亲密接触描述为一种“关怀”——这是构建对话的一种特别有用的方式。

结论

虽然工作人员、居民和家庭成员经常使用需求和权利这种常见的语言来讨论获得亲密接触的问题,但他们也使用了幸福感和关怀的语言。以这种方式重新构建对话有一个有益的目的:它将焦点从仅仅履行最低义务转移到一种健康生成方法——一种关注照顾整个人以提高整体幸福感和生活质量的方法。

相似文献

1
Intimacy for older adults in long-term care: a need, a right, a privilege-or a kind of care?长期护理机构中老年患者的亲密关系:一种需求、一项权利、一种特权——还是一种护理方式?
J Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 23. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107171.
2
Not in the Brochure: and Residential Aged Care.宣传册未提及:以及老年住宅护理。
Sex Res Social Policy. 2022;19(2):588-598. doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00573-y. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
3
Culture clash: responses to sexual diversity in residential aged care.文化冲突:老年护理机构中对性多样性的反应。
Cult Health Sex. 2022 Apr;24(4):548-563. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2021.1871649. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
A scoping review of education and training resources supporting care home staff in facilitating residents' sexuality, intimacy and relational needs.支持养老院工作人员促进居民的性、亲密关系和关系需求的教育和培训资源的范围综述。
Age Ageing. 2021 May 5;50(3):758-771. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afab022.
5
Feasibility and acceptability of an education and training e-resource to support the sexuality, intimacy and relationship needs of older care home residents: a mixed methods study.支持老年养老院居民的性、亲密关系和关系需求的教育和培训电子资源的可行性和可接受性:一项混合方法研究。
Age Ageing. 2022 Oct 6;51(10). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac221.
6
Ethics, intimacy and sexuality in aged care.老年关怀中的伦理、亲密关系和性。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Dec;73(12):3017-3027. doi: 10.1111/jan.13361. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
7
Palliative Care, Intimacy, and Sexual Expression in the Older Adult Residential Care Context: "Living until You Don't".老年长期护理环境中的姑息治疗、亲密关系和性表达:“活至不能”。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 12;19(20):13080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013080.
8
Iatrogenic loneliness and loss of intimacy in residential care.在养老院中产生的医源性孤独和亲密感的丧失。
Nurs Ethics. 2021 Sep;28(6):911-923. doi: 10.1177/0969733020983394. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
9
Utilization of the Intimacy and Sexuality Expression Preference tool in long-term care: a case study.亲密关系与性表达偏好工具在长期护理中的应用:一项案例研究。
Front Dement. 2024 Feb 26;3:1270569. doi: 10.3389/frdem.2024.1270569. eCollection 2024.
10
Nurses' experiences and reactions towards intimacy and sexuality expressions by nursing home residents: A qualitative study.护士对养老院居民表达亲密和性的体验和反应:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Mar;28(5-6):836-849. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14680. Epub 2018 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Palliative Care, Intimacy, and Sexual Expression in the Older Adult Residential Care Context: "Living until You Don't".老年长期护理环境中的姑息治疗、亲密关系和性表达:“活至不能”。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 12;19(20):13080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013080.