Pickersgill Martyn
The University of Edinburgh, UK.
Sociology. 2021 Jun;55(3):600-618. doi: 10.1177/0038038520954752. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
Epigenetics is regarded by many as a compelling domain of biomedicine. The purported novelty of epigenetics has begun to have various societal ramifications, particularly in relation to processes of responsibilisation. Within sociology, it has stimulated hopeful debate about conceptual rapprochements between the biomedical and social sciences. This article is concerned with novelty is socially produced and negotiated. The article engages directly with scientists' talk and writings about epigenetics (as process and field of study). I aim to advance an explicitly sociological analysis about the novelty of epigenetics that underscores its social production rather than an account which participates in its reification. I attend to definitional skirmishes, comparisons with genetics, excitement and intrigue, and considerations of the ethical dimensions of epigenetics. Any assertions that epigenetics is exciting or important should not inadvertently elide reflexive consideration of how such characterisations might be part of the machinery by which they become real.
表观遗传学被许多人视为生物医学中一个引人注目的领域。表观遗传学所谓的新颖性已开始产生各种社会影响,特别是在责任化过程方面。在社会学领域,它引发了关于生物医学与社会科学之间概念融合的有益辩论。本文关注的是这种新颖性是如何在社会中产生和协商的。本文直接探讨了科学家们关于表观遗传学(作为过程和研究领域)的言论和著作。我的目的是推进一项关于表观遗传学新颖性的明确社会学分析,强调其社会产生,而不是参与其物化的描述。我关注定义上的争论、与遗传学的比较、兴奋和 intrigue(此处原文有误,根据语境推测可能是“兴趣”等类似意思)以及表观遗传学伦理维度的考量。任何关于表观遗传学令人兴奋或重要的断言都不应不经意地忽略对这些特征如何可能成为使其成为现实的机制一部分的反思性思考。