Suppr超能文献

协商新奇性:在表观遗传学的科学叙述中构建新颖性

Negotiating Novelty: Constructing the Novel within Scientific Accounts of Epigenetics.

作者信息

Pickersgill Martyn

机构信息

The University of Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Sociology. 2021 Jun;55(3):600-618. doi: 10.1177/0038038520954752. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

Abstract

Epigenetics is regarded by many as a compelling domain of biomedicine. The purported novelty of epigenetics has begun to have various societal ramifications, particularly in relation to processes of responsibilisation. Within sociology, it has stimulated hopeful debate about conceptual rapprochements between the biomedical and social sciences. This article is concerned with novelty is socially produced and negotiated. The article engages directly with scientists' talk and writings about epigenetics (as process and field of study). I aim to advance an explicitly sociological analysis about the novelty of epigenetics that underscores its social production rather than an account which participates in its reification. I attend to definitional skirmishes, comparisons with genetics, excitement and intrigue, and considerations of the ethical dimensions of epigenetics. Any assertions that epigenetics is exciting or important should not inadvertently elide reflexive consideration of how such characterisations might be part of the machinery by which they become real.

摘要

表观遗传学被许多人视为生物医学中一个引人注目的领域。表观遗传学所谓的新颖性已开始产生各种社会影响,特别是在责任化过程方面。在社会学领域,它引发了关于生物医学与社会科学之间概念融合的有益辩论。本文关注的是这种新颖性是如何在社会中产生和协商的。本文直接探讨了科学家们关于表观遗传学(作为过程和研究领域)的言论和著作。我的目的是推进一项关于表观遗传学新颖性的明确社会学分析,强调其社会产生,而不是参与其物化的描述。我关注定义上的争论、与遗传学的比较、兴奋和 intrigue(此处原文有误,根据语境推测可能是“兴趣”等类似意思)以及表观遗传学伦理维度的考量。任何关于表观遗传学令人兴奋或重要的断言都不应不经意地忽略对这些特征如何可能成为使其成为现实的机制一部分的反思性思考。

相似文献

1
Negotiating Novelty: Constructing the Novel within Scientific Accounts of Epigenetics.
Sociology. 2021 Jun;55(3):600-618. doi: 10.1177/0038038520954752. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
2
Mapping the new molecular landscape: social dimensions of epigenetics.
New Genet Soc. 2013 Dec;32(4):429-447. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2013.861739. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
3
Epistemic modesty, ostentatiousness and the uncertainties of epigenetics: on the knowledge machinery of (social) science.
Sociol Rev Monogr. 2016 Mar;64(1):186-202. doi: 10.1002/2059-7932.12020. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
4
The social construction of the social epigenome and the larger biological context.
Epigenetics Chromatin. 2020 Sep 23;13(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13072-020-00360-w.
5
Getting scientists to think about what they are doing.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2001 Apr;7(2):165-76. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0038-2.
6
Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory.
Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Sep;28(6):732-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00539.x.
7
Scientists' perception of ethical issues in nanomedicine: a case study.
Nanomedicine (Lond). 2011 Jun;6(4):681-91. doi: 10.2217/nnm.11.9. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
8
Epigenetics Changes Nothing: What a New Scientific Field Does and Does Not Mean for Ethics and Social Justice.
Public Health Ethics. 2017 Aug 14;11(1):69-81. doi: 10.1093/phe/phx013. eCollection 2018 Apr.
10
Psychiatry and the Sociology of Novelty: Negotiating the US National Institute of Mental Health "Research Domain Criteria" (RDoC).
Sci Technol Human Values. 2019 Jul;44(4):612-633. doi: 10.1177/0162243919841693. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

2
Infrastructuring Educational Genomics: Associations, Architectures, and Apparatuses.
Postdigit Sci Educ. 2024;6(4):1143-1172. doi: 10.1007/s42438-023-00451-3. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
4
From 'making lists' to conducting 'well-rounded' studies: Epistemic re-orientations in soil microbial ecology.
Soc Stud Sci. 2024 Feb;54(1):78-104. doi: 10.1177/03063127231179700. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
5
Who Gets Cured? COVID-19 and Developing a Critical Medical Sociology and Anthropology of Cure.
Front Sociol. 2021 Jan 12;5:613548. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.613548. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychiatry and the Sociology of Novelty: Negotiating the US National Institute of Mental Health "Research Domain Criteria" (RDoC).
Sci Technol Human Values. 2019 Jul;44(4):612-633. doi: 10.1177/0162243919841693. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
2
The paradox of care in behavioral epigenetics: Constructing early-life adversity in the lab.
Biosocieties. 2018 Dec;13(4):698-714. doi: 10.1057/s41292-017-0090-z. Epub 2018 May 9.
3
Eugenics, Epigenetics, and Obesity Predisposition among Mexican Mestizos.
Med Anthropol. 2019 Nov-Dec;38(8):664-679. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2019.1589466. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
4
Epigenetics Changes Nothing: What a New Scientific Field Does and Does Not Mean for Ethics and Social Justice.
Public Health Ethics. 2017 Aug 14;11(1):69-81. doi: 10.1093/phe/phx013. eCollection 2018 Apr.
5
The Key Role of Epigenetics in Human Disease Prevention and Mitigation.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 5;378(14):1323-1334. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1402513.
6
The Redistribution of Reproductive Responsibility: On the Epigenetics of "Environment" in Prenatal Interventions.
Med Anthropol Q. 2018 Sep;32(3):425-442. doi: 10.1111/maq.12424. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
A user's guide to the ambiguous word 'epigenetics'.
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018 Apr;19(4):207-208. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.135. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
9
Targeting the cancer epigenome for therapy.
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Sep 15;17(10):630-41. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.93.
10
Epistemic modesty, ostentatiousness and the uncertainties of epigenetics: on the knowledge machinery of (social) science.
Sociol Rev Monogr. 2016 Mar;64(1):186-202. doi: 10.1002/2059-7932.12020. Epub 2016 Apr 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验