Pickersgill Martyn
Sociol Rev Monogr. 2016 Mar;64(1):186-202. doi: 10.1002/2059-7932.12020. Epub 2016 Apr 21.
Epigenetic processes are garnering attention in the social sciences, where some scholars assert their importance for theorizing social life. I engage with such ideas here by drawing on interviews with leading bioscientists. To begin with, I underscore the (productive) uncertainties of those working in and around epigenetics; I describe these as a manifestation of 'epistemic modesty', and suggest that dissensus helps to propel biomedical innovation. Then, drawing on the concept of 'alien science', I detail some researchers' ambivalences regarding the notion of 'transgenerational inheritance'; their dissatisfaction with the (public) communication practices of other scientists (situated in what I term a regime of 'epistemic ostentatiousness'); and the challenges faced when moderating societal discussion of epigenetics in ways that expand excitement whilst deflating (what researchers regard as) unrealistic expectations. The paper concludes with reflections on the knowledge machinery of the (social) sciences, and employs the study data to interrogate sociological engagements with epigenetics.
表观遗传过程正在社会科学领域引起关注,一些学者认为其对社会生活理论化具有重要意义。在此,我通过采访顶尖生物科学家来探讨这些观点。首先,我强调了从事表观遗传学研究及相关工作的人员所面临的(富有成效的)不确定性;我将这些不确定性描述为“认知谦逊”的一种表现,并指出分歧有助于推动生物医学创新。然后,借鉴“异类科学”的概念,我详细阐述了一些研究人员对“跨代遗传”概念的矛盾态度;他们对其他科学家(处于我所称的“认知炫耀”体制下)的(公开)传播行为的不满;以及在以既能激发兴趣又能降低(研究人员认为的)不切实际期望的方式来引导社会对表观遗传学的讨论时所面临的挑战。本文最后对(社会)科学的知识机制进行了反思,并利用研究数据审视社会学与表观遗传学的结合。