IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2022;15:169-183. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2021.3092208. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
In recent years, statistical studies highlighted an increasing incidence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) which reflected on additional costs on the healthcare systems worldwide. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement is commonly considered a CVD predictor factor as well as a marker of Arterial Stiffness (AS) since it is closely related to the mechanical characteristics of the arterial wall. An increase in PWV is due to a more rigid arterial system. Because of the prevalence of the elastic component, in young people the PWV is lower than in the elderly. Nowadays, invasive and non-invasive methods for PWV assessment are employed: there is an increasing attention in the development of non-invasive devices which mostly perform a regional PWV measurement (over a long arterial portion) rather than local (over a short arterial portion). The accepted gold-standard for non-invasive AS measurement is the carotid-femoral PWV used to evaluate the arterial damage, the corresponding cardiovascular risk and to adapt the proper therapy. This review article considers the main commercially available devices underlining their operating principles in terms of sensors, execution mode, pulse waveforms acquired, site of measurement, distance and time estimation methods, as well as their main limitations in clinical practice.
近年来,统计研究强调了心血管疾病 (CVD) 的发病率不断上升,这反映在全球医疗保健系统的额外成本上。脉搏波速度 (PWV) 测量通常被认为是 CVD 的预测因素,也是动脉僵硬度 (AS) 的标志物,因为它与动脉壁的机械特性密切相关。PWV 的增加是由于动脉系统更加僵硬。由于弹性成分的普遍性,年轻人的 PWV 低于老年人。如今,人们采用了侵入性和非侵入性的 PWV 评估方法:人们越来越关注开发非侵入性设备,这些设备主要进行区域性 PWV 测量(在长段动脉上),而不是局部测量(在短段动脉上)。颈动脉-股动脉 PWV 是评估动脉损伤、相应心血管风险和适应适当治疗的非侵入性 AS 测量的金标准。本文综述了主要的商业上可用的设备,强调了它们在传感器、执行模式、获取的脉搏波、测量部位、距离和时间估计方法方面的工作原理,以及它们在临床实践中的主要局限性。