Sreeramareddy Chandrashekhar T, Aye Saint Nway
Department of Community Medicine, International Medical University, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Pathology, International Medical University, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;21(1):1209. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11201-0.
Hardcore smoking behaviours and test of hardening are seldom reported from low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs). We report country-wise changes in smoking behaviors between two sequential surveys and explored ecologically the relationship between MPOWER scores and smoking behaviors including hardcore smoking.
We analysed sequential Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) data done at least at five years interval in 10 countries namely India, Bangladesh, China, Mexico, Philippines, Russia, Turkey, Ukraine, Uruguay, and Vietnam. We estimated weighted prevalence rates of smoking behaviors namely current smoking (both daily and non-daily), prevalence of hardcore smoking (HCS) among current smokers (HCSs%) and entire surveyed population (HCSp%), quit ratios (QR), and the number of cigarettes smoked per day (CPD). We calculated absolute and relative (%) change in rates between two surveys in each country. Using aggregate data, we correlated relative change in current smoking prevalence with relative change in HCSs% and HCSp% as well as explored the relationship of MPOWER score with relative change in smoking behaviors using Spearman' rank correlation test.
Overall daily smoking has declined in all ten countries lead by a 23% decline in Russia. In India, Bangladesh, and Philippines HCSs% decreased as the smoking rate decreased while HCSs% increased in Turkey (66%), Vietnam (33%) and Ukraine (15%). In most countries, CPD ranged from 15 to 20 sticks except in Mexico (7.8), and India (10.4) where CPD declined by 18 and 22% respectively. MPOWER scores were moderately correlated with HCSs% in both sexes (r = 0.644, p = 0.044) and HCSp% (r = 0.632, p = 0.05) and among women only HCSs% (r = 0.804, p = 0.005) was significantly correlated with MPOWER score.
With declining smoking prevalence, HCS had also decreased and quit rates improved. Ecologically, a positive linear relationship between changes in smoking and HCS is a possible evidence against 'hardening'. Continued monitoring of the changes in quitting and hardcore smoking behaviours is required to plan cessation services.
中低收入国家(LMICs)很少报告重度吸烟行为和烟瘾测试情况。我们报告了两次连续调查之间各国吸烟行为的变化,并从生态学角度探讨了MPOWER评分与包括重度吸烟在内的吸烟行为之间的关系。
我们分析了在印度、孟加拉国、中国、墨西哥、菲律宾、俄罗斯、土耳其、乌克兰、乌拉圭和越南这10个国家至少间隔五年进行的连续全球成人烟草调查(GATS)数据。我们估计了吸烟行为的加权患病率,即当前吸烟率(包括每日吸烟和非每日吸烟)、当前吸烟者中重度吸烟(HCS)的患病率(HCSs%)和整个被调查人群中的患病率(HCSp%)、戒烟率(QR)以及每天吸烟的支数(CPD)。我们计算了每个国家两次调查之间患病率的绝对变化和相对(%)变化。利用汇总数据,我们将当前吸烟患病率的相对变化与HCSs%和HCSp%的相对变化进行关联,并使用Spearman秩相关检验探讨MPOWER评分与吸烟行为相对变化之间的关系。
所有十个国家的总体每日吸烟率均有所下降,其中俄罗斯下降了23%。在印度、孟加拉国和菲律宾,随着吸烟率下降,HCSs%降低,而在土耳其(66%)、越南(33%)和乌克兰(15%),HCSs%有所上升。在大多数国家,CPD范围为15至20支,除了墨西哥(7.8支)和印度(10.4支),这两个国家的CPD分别下降了18%和22%。MPOWER评分与男女两性的HCSs%(r = 0.644,p = 0.044)和HCSp%(r = 0.632,p = 0.05)呈中度相关,仅在女性中,HCSs%(r = 0.804,p = 0.005)与MPOWER评分显著相关。
随着吸烟率下降,重度吸烟率也有所下降,戒烟率有所提高。从生态学角度看,吸烟变化与重度吸烟之间的正线性关系可能是反对“烟瘾强化”的证据。需要持续监测戒烟和重度吸烟行为的变化,以规划戒烟服务。