Suppr超能文献

吸入一氧化氮治疗重症/危重症 COVID-19 患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价。

Efficacy and safety of inhaled nitric oxide in the treatment of severe/critical COVID-19 patients: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Experimental Pharmacology Laboratory, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Department of Ophthalmology, GMCH, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pharmacol. 2021 May-Jun;53(3):236-243. doi: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_382_21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Present systematic review aimed to analyze the effect of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in the treatment of severe COVID-19 and to compare it to standard of care (SOC), antiviral medications, and other medicines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Ovid, Web of Science, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, BioRxiv and MedRxiv, and Cochrane (up to April 20, 2021) were the search databases. Two reviewers (SK and CK) independently selected the electronic published literature that studied the effect of nitric oxide with SOC or control. The clinical and physiological outcomes such as prevention of progressive systemic de-oxygenation/clinical improvement, mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, improvement in pulmonary arterial pressure, and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

The 14 retrospective/protective studies randomly assigning 423 patients met the inclusion criteria. Cumulative study of the selected articles showed that iNO has a mild impact on ventilation time or ventilator-free days. iNO has increased the partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio of fraction of inspired oxygen in a few patients as compared to baseline. However, in most of the studies, it does not have better outcome when compared to the baseline improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome, nitric oxide is linked to a slight increase in oxygenation but has no effect on mortality.

摘要

目的

本次系统评价旨在分析吸入一氧化氮(iNO)治疗严重 COVID-19 的效果,并将其与标准治疗(SOC)、抗病毒药物和其他药物进行比较。

材料和方法

检索 Medline(PubMed)、Scopus、Embase、Ovid、Web of Science、Science Direct、Wiley Online Library、BioRxiv 和 MedRxiv 以及 Cochrane(截至 2021 年 4 月 20 日)等数据库。两名审查员(SK 和 CK)独立选择研究 SOC 或对照药物中一氧化氮效果的电子发表文献。评估临床和生理结果,如预防进行性全身去氧/临床改善、死亡率、机械通气时间、肺动脉压改善和不良事件。

结果

14 项回顾性/保护研究随机分配了 423 名患者,符合纳入标准。对所选文章的综合研究表明,iNO 对通气时间或无呼吸机天数的影响较小。与基线相比,iNO 仅使少数患者的氧分压/吸入氧分数比升高。然而,在大多数研究中,与基线改善相比,iNO 并没有更好的结果。

结论

在 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中,一氧化氮可略微增加氧合作用,但对死亡率没有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0044/8262415/9839a1816a9b/IJPharm-53-236-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验