Georgia Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Nephrology Division, Department of Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.
Front Immunol. 2021 Jun 11;12:687715. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.687715. eCollection 2021.
The outcome of organ transplantation is largely dictated by selection of a well-matched donor, which results in less chance of graft rejection. An allogeneic immune response is the main immunological barrier for successful organ transplantation. Donor and recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching diminishes outcomes after solid organ transplantation. The current evaluation of HLA incompatibility does not provide information on the immunogenicity of individual HLA mismatches and impact of non-HLA-related alloantigens, especially . Here we demonstrate a new method for analysis of alloimmune responsiveness between donor and recipient by introducing a humanized mouse model. Using molecular, cellular, and genomic analyses, we demonstrated that a recipient's personalized humanized mouse provided the most sensitive assessment of allogeneic responsiveness to potential donors. In our study, HLA typing provided a better recipient-donor match for one donor among two related donors. In contrast, assessment of an allogeneic response by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) was indistinguishable between these donors. We determined that, in the recipient's humanized mouse model, the donor selected by HLA typing induced the strongest allogeneic response with markedly increased allograft rejection markers, including activated cytotoxic Granzyme B-expressing CD8 T cells. Moreover, the same donor induced stronger upregulation of genes involved in the allograft rejection pathway as determined by transcriptome analysis of isolated human CD45cells. Thus, the humanized mouse model determined the lowest degree of recipient-donor alloimmune response, allowing for better selection of donor and minimized immunological risk of allograft rejection in organ transplantation. In addition, this approach could be used to evaluate the level of alloresponse in allogeneic cell-based therapies that include cell products derived from pluripotent embryonic stem cells or adult stem cells, both undifferentiated and differentiated, all of which will produce allogeneic immune responses.
器官移植的结果在很大程度上取决于选择匹配良好的供体,这可以降低移植物排斥的机会。同种异体免疫反应是实体器官移植成功的主要免疫障碍。供体和受者人类白细胞抗原(HLA)不匹配会降低实体器官移植后的效果。目前对 HLA 不匹配的评估不能提供个体 HLA 不匹配的免疫原性和非 HLA 相关同种异体抗原的影响信息,特别是。在这里,我们通过引入一种人源化小鼠模型来展示一种分析供体和受者之间同种免疫反应的新方法。通过分子、细胞和基因组分析,我们证明受者的个性化人源化小鼠提供了对潜在供体的同种异体反应的最敏感评估。在我们的研究中,HLA 分型为两个相关供体中的一个供体提供了更好的受者-供体匹配。相比之下,混合淋巴细胞反应(MLR)对同种异体反应的评估在这些供体之间无法区分。我们确定,在受者的人源化小鼠模型中,通过 HLA 分型选择的供体诱导了最强的同种异体反应,并显著增加了同种异体移植排斥标志物,包括表达活化细胞毒性颗粒酶 B 的 CD8 T 细胞。此外,通过分离的人 CD45 细胞的转录组分析,相同的供体诱导了同种异体排斥途径中涉及的基因的更强上调。因此,人源化小鼠模型确定了受者-供体同种免疫反应的最低程度,从而可以更好地选择供体,并最大限度地降低器官移植中同种异体移植排斥的免疫风险。此外,这种方法可用于评估同种异体细胞疗法中同种反应的水平,包括来自多能胚胎干细胞或成体干细胞的细胞产物,包括未分化和分化的细胞,所有这些都会产生同种异体免疫反应。