Sun Jinsong, Jung Tzyy-Ping, Xiao Xiaolin, Meng Jiayuan, Xu Minpeng, Ming Dong
Academy of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine. Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, P.R.China.
School of Precision Instrument and Opto-electronics Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, P.R.China.
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 25;38(3):463-472. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202012013.
Error self-detection based on error-related potentials (ErrP) is promising to improve the practicability of brain-computer interface systems. But the single trial recognition of ErrP is still a challenge that hinters the development of this technology. To assess the performance of different algorithms on decoding ErrP, this paper test four kinds of linear discriminant analysis algorithms, two kinds of support vector machines, logistic regression, and discriminative canonical pattern matching (DCPM) on two open accessed datasets. All algorithms were evaluated by their classification accuracies and their generalization ability on different sizes of training sets. The study results show that DCPM has the best performance. This study shows a comprehensive comparison of different algorithms on ErrP classification, which could give guidance for the selection of ErrP algorithm.
基于错误相关电位(ErrP)的错误自检测有望提高脑机接口系统的实用性。但ErrP的单次试验识别仍然是一个挑战,阻碍了该技术的发展。为了评估不同算法对ErrP解码的性能,本文在两个公开数据集上测试了四种线性判别分析算法、两种支持向量机、逻辑回归和判别性规范模式匹配(DCPM)。所有算法均通过其分类准确率以及在不同规模训练集上的泛化能力进行评估。研究结果表明,DCPM具有最佳性能。本研究对不同算法在ErrP分类上进行了全面比较,可为ErrP算法的选择提供指导。