• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Flexible use of copula-type model for dose-finding in drug combination clinical trials.灵活运用连接词模型进行药物联合临床试验的剂量探索。
Biometrics. 2022 Dec;78(4):1651-1661. doi: 10.1111/biom.13510. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
2
Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification.评估模型误设定下 I-II 期临床试验中 Copula 模型的性能。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Apr 14;14:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-51.
3
Competing designs for drug combination in phase I dose-finding clinical trials.I期剂量探索性临床试验中联合用药的竞争设计
Stat Med. 2015 Jan 15;34(1):1-12. doi: 10.1002/sim.6094. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
4
A hybrid design for dose-finding oncology clinical trials.一种肿瘤临床试验的混合设计剂量探索。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;151(9):1602-1610. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34203. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
5
A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.违反单调假设的临床试验中 I 期剂量发现设计的比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;17(5):522-534. doi: 10.1177/1740774520932130. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
6
Adaptive design for identifying maximum tolerated dose early to accelerate dose-finding trial.用于早期识别最大耐受剂量以加速剂量发现试验的适应性设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01584-y.
7
The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies.在样本量较小的剂量发现研究中使用 3+3 设计:陷阱及可能的补救措施。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):350-357. doi: 10.1177/17407745241240401. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
8
A clinical phase I dose-finding design with adaptive shrinking boundaries for drug combination trials.一种具有自适应收缩边界的药物组合试验临床 I 期剂量发现设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Mar 2;23(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01867-y.
9
Dose escalation with over-dose and under-dose controls in Phase I/II clinical trials.在I/II期临床试验中进行剂量递增并设有过量和不足剂量控制。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.014. Epub 2015 May 24.
10
A comparison of model-free phase I dose escalation designs for dual-agent combination therapies.双药联合疗法的非模型I期剂量递增设计比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):203-226. doi: 10.1177/09622802231220497. Epub 2024 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
A benchmark for dose-finding studies with unknown ordering.一种用于具有未知顺序的剂量发现研究的基准。
Biostatistics. 2022 Jul 18;23(3):721-737. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa054.
2
Keyboard design for phase I drug-combination trials.用于I期药物联合试验的键盘设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 May;92:105972. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105972. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
3
Immune checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations: is dose escalation mandatory for phase I trials?免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗:在 I 期临床试验中是否必须进行剂量递增?
Ann Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;30(11):1751-1759. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz286.
4
Cancer phase I trial design using drug combinations when a fraction of dose limiting toxicities is attributable to one or more agents.当部分剂量限制性毒性可归因于一种或多种药物时,使用药物组合的癌症I期试验设计。
Biom J. 2019 Mar;61(2):319-332. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201700166. Epub 2018 May 28.
5
Modelling semi-attributable toxicity in dual-agent phase I trials with non-concurrent drug administration.在非同步给药的双药一期试验中对半归因毒性进行建模。
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 30;36(2):225-241. doi: 10.1002/sim.6912. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
6
Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding in drug-combination trials.药物联合试验中剂量探索的贝叶斯最优区间设计
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Oct;26(5):2155-2167. doi: 10.1177/0962280215594494. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
A comparative study of adaptive dose-finding designs for phase I oncology trials of combination therapies.联合疗法肿瘤学I期试验适应性剂量探索设计的比较研究。
Stat Med. 2015 Oct 30;34(24):3194-213. doi: 10.1002/sim.6533. Epub 2015 May 13.
8
A product of independent beta probabilities dose escalation design for dual-agent phase I trials.用于双药一期试验的独立贝塔概率剂量递增设计的一个产物。
Stat Med. 2015 Apr 15;34(8):1261-76. doi: 10.1002/sim.6434. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
9
A phase Ib dose-escalation study of the oral pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (BKM120) in combination with the oral MEK1/2 inhibitor trametinib (GSK1120212) in patients with selected advanced solid tumors.一项评估口服泛 PI3K 抑制剂 BKM120(Buparlisib)联合口服 MEK1/2 抑制剂 Trametinib(GSK1120212)在多种晚期实体瘤患者中的 Ib 期剂量递增研究。
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 15;21(4):730-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1814. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
10
Comments on 'competing designs for drug combination in phase I dose-finding clinical trials' by M-K. Riviere, F. Dubois, and S. Zohar.对M-K. 里维耶、F. 杜波依斯和S. 佐哈尔所著的《I期剂量探索性临床试验中药物联合使用的竞争设计》的评论
Stat Med. 2015 Jan 15;34(1):13-7. doi: 10.1002/sim.6338.

灵活运用连接词模型进行药物联合临床试验的剂量探索。

Flexible use of copula-type model for dose-finding in drug combination clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Information and Computer Technology, Graduate School of Engineering, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo, Japan.

Global Biometrics and Data Science, Bristol Myers Squibb K.K, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2022 Dec;78(4):1651-1661. doi: 10.1111/biom.13510. Epub 2021 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1111/biom.13510
PMID:34181760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10393268/
Abstract

Identification of the maximum tolerated dose combination (MTDC) of cancer drugs is an important objective in phase I oncology trials. Numerous dose-finding designs for drug combination have been proposed over the years. Copula-type models exhibit distinctive advantages in this task over other models used in existing competitive designs. For example, their application enables the consideration of dose-limiting toxicities attributable to one of two agents. However, if a particular combination therapy demonstrates extremely synergistic toxicity, copula-type models are liable to induce biases in toxicity probability estimators due to the associated Fréchet-Hoeffding bounds. Consequently, the dose-finding performance may be worse than those of other competitive designs. The objective of this study is to improve the performance of dose-finding designs based on copula-type models while maintaining their advantageous properties. We propose an extension of the parameter space of the interaction term in copula-type models. This releases the Fréchet-Hoeffding bounds, making the estimation of toxicity probabilities more flexible. Numerical examples in various scenarios demonstrate that the performance (e.g., the percentage of correct MTDC selection) of the proposed method is better than those exhibited by existing copula-type models and comparable with those of other competitive designs, irrespective of the existence of extreme synergistic toxicity. The results obtained in this study could motivate the real-world application of the proposed method in cases requiring the utilization of the properties of copula-type models.

摘要

确定癌症药物的最大耐受剂量组合(MTDC)是肿瘤学 I 期试验的一个重要目标。多年来已经提出了许多用于药物组合的剂量发现设计。在这项任务中,与现有竞争设计中使用的其他模型相比,Copula 型模型具有独特的优势。例如,它们的应用可以考虑归因于两种药物之一的剂量限制毒性。然而,如果特定的联合治疗表现出极其协同的毒性,Copula 型模型由于相关的 Fréchet-Hoeffding 边界,可能会导致毒性概率估计器产生偏差。因此,剂量发现性能可能会比其他竞争设计差。本研究的目的是在保持有利特性的同时,提高基于 Copula 型模型的剂量发现设计的性能。我们提出了扩展 Copula 型模型中交互项参数空间的方法。这释放了 Fréchet-Hoeffding 边界,使毒性概率的估计更加灵活。在各种情况下的数值示例表明,无论是否存在极端协同毒性,所提出方法的性能(例如,正确选择 MTDC 的百分比)都优于现有 Copula 型模型和其他竞争设计的性能。本研究的结果可能会激励在需要利用 Copula 型模型特性的情况下,将所提出的方法实际应用于现实世界。