• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A benchmark for dose-finding studies with unknown ordering.一种用于具有未知顺序的剂量发现研究的基准。
Biostatistics. 2022 Jul 18;23(3):721-737. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa054.
2
A benchmark for dose finding studies with continuous outcomes.一种用于连续结局剂量发现研究的基准。
Biostatistics. 2020 Apr 1;21(2):189-201. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy045.
3
A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.违反单调假设的临床试验中 I 期剂量发现设计的比较。
Clin Trials. 2020 Oct;17(5):522-534. doi: 10.1177/1740774520932130. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
4
A web application for evaluating Phase I methods using a non-parametric optimal benchmark.使用非参数最优基准评估 I 期方法的网络应用程序。
Clin Trials. 2017 Oct;14(5):553-557. doi: 10.1177/1740774517715456. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
5
Using a dose-finding benchmark to quantify the loss incurred by dichotomization in Phase II dose-ranging studies.使用剂量探索基准来量化在 II 期剂量范围研究中二分法造成的损失。
Biom J. 2020 Nov;62(7):1717-1729. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201900332. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
6
Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering.假设部分随机排序的分子靶向药物联合使用的贝叶斯剂量探索设计
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):859-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.6376. Epub 2014 Nov 21.
7
Bayesian optimization design for finding a maximum tolerated dose combination in phase I clinical trials.贝叶斯优化设计在 I 期临床试验中寻找最大耐受剂量组合。
Int J Biostat. 2021 Apr 5;18(1):39-56. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2020-0147.
8
Simple benchmark for complex dose finding studies.复杂剂量探索研究的简易基准。
Biometrics. 2014 Jun;70(2):389-97. doi: 10.1111/biom.12158. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
9
Dose-finding design for multi-drug combinations.多药物组合的剂量发现设计。
Clin Trials. 2011 Aug;8(4):380-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774511408748. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
10
Dose-finding design and benchmark for a right censored endpoint.适用于右删失终点的剂量发现设计和基准
J Biopharm Stat. 2020 Nov 1;30(6):948-963. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2020.1821702. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of model-free phase I dose escalation designs for dual-agent combination therapies.双药联合疗法的非模型I期剂量递增设计比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Feb;33(2):203-226. doi: 10.1177/09622802231220497. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
2
Practical implementation of the partial ordering continual reassessment method in a Phase I combination-schedule dose-finding trial.在 I 期联合方案剂量探索试验中部分有序连续再评估方法的实际应用。
Stat Med. 2022 Dec 30;41(30):5789-5809. doi: 10.1002/sim.9594. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
3
Practical recommendations for implementing a Bayesian adaptive phase I design during a pandemic.大流行期间实施贝叶斯自适应 I 期设计的实用建议。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jan 20;22(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01512-0.
4
Operating characteristics are needed to properly evaluate the scientific validity of phase I protocols.操作特性是正确评估 I 期方案科学有效性所必需的。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Sep;108:106517. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106517. Epub 2021 Jul 25.
5
Flexible use of copula-type model for dose-finding in drug combination clinical trials.灵活运用连接词模型进行药物联合临床试验的剂量探索。
Biometrics. 2022 Dec;78(4):1651-1661. doi: 10.1111/biom.13510. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
6
Using an Interaction Parameter in Model-Based Phase I Trials for Combination Treatments? A Simulation Study.基于交互作用参数的联合治疗模型的 I 期临床试验?一项模拟研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 5;18(1):345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010345.

本文引用的文献

1
An information theoretic phase I-II design for molecularly targeted agents that does not require an assumption of monotonicity.一种针对分子靶向药物的信息论I-II期设计,该设计不需要单调性假设。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2019 Feb;68(2):347-367. doi: 10.1111/rssc.12293. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
2
A benchmark for dose finding studies with continuous outcomes.一种用于连续结局剂量发现研究的基准。
Biostatistics. 2020 Apr 1;21(2):189-201. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxy045.
3
A web application for evaluating Phase I methods using a non-parametric optimal benchmark.使用非参数最优基准评估 I 期方法的网络应用程序。
Clin Trials. 2017 Oct;14(5):553-557. doi: 10.1177/1740774517715456. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
4
A comparative study of adaptive dose-finding designs for phase I oncology trials of combination therapies.联合疗法肿瘤学I期试验适应性剂量探索设计的比较研究。
Stat Med. 2015 Oct 30;34(24):3194-213. doi: 10.1002/sim.6533. Epub 2015 May 13.
5
Simple benchmark for complex dose finding studies.复杂剂量探索研究的简易基准。
Biometrics. 2014 Jun;70(2):389-97. doi: 10.1111/biom.12158. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
6
Competing designs for drug combination in phase I dose-finding clinical trials.I期剂量探索性临床试验中联合用药的竞争设计
Stat Med. 2015 Jan 15;34(1):1-12. doi: 10.1002/sim.6094. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
7
Phase I design for completely or partially ordered treatment schedules.完全或部分有序治疗方案的I期设计
Stat Med. 2014 Feb 20;33(4):569-79. doi: 10.1002/sim.5998. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
8
Sample size formulae for the Bayesian continual reassessment method.贝叶斯连续重新评估法的样本量公式。
Clin Trials. 2013;10(6):852-61. doi: 10.1177/1740774513497294. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
9
pocrm: an R-package for phase I trials of combinations of agents.pocrm:用于联合用药的 I 期临床试验的 R 包。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013 Oct;112(1):211-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
10
Specifications of a continual reassessment method design for phase I trials of combined drugs.联合用药 I 期试验的连续重新评估法设计规范。
Pharm Stat. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):217-24. doi: 10.1002/pst.1575. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

一种用于具有未知顺序的剂量发现研究的基准。

A benchmark for dose-finding studies with unknown ordering.

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Université Versailles St Quentin & INSERM U900 STAMPM, Institut Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

Biostatistics. 2022 Jul 18;23(3):721-737. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa054.

DOI:10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa054
PMID:33409536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9291639/
Abstract

An important tool to evaluate the performance of a dose-finding design is the nonparametric optimal benchmark that provides an upper bound on the performance of a design under a given scenario. A fundamental assumption of the benchmark is that the investigator can arrange doses in a monotonically increasing toxicity order. While the benchmark can be still applied to combination studies in which not all dose combinations can be ordered, it does not account for the uncertainty in the ordering. In this article, we propose a generalization of the benchmark that accounts for this uncertainty and, as a result, provides a sharper upper bound on the performance. The benchmark assesses how probable the occurrence of each ordering is, given the complete information about each patient. The proposed approach can be applied to trials with an arbitrary number of endpoints with discrete or continuous distributions. We illustrate the utility of the benchmark using recently proposed dose-finding designs for Phase I combination trials with a binary toxicity endpoint and Phase I/II combination trials with binary toxicity and continuous efficacy.

摘要

评估剂量探索设计性能的一个重要工具是无参数最优基准,它为给定方案下设计的性能提供了上限。基准的一个基本假设是研究者可以按单调递增的毒性顺序安排剂量。虽然基准仍然适用于不能对所有剂量组合进行排序的联合研究,但它没有考虑到排序的不确定性。在本文中,我们提出了一种基准的推广,它考虑到了这种不确定性,从而对性能提供了更精确的上限。该基准根据每个患者的完整信息来评估每种排序发生的可能性。所提出的方法可以应用于具有离散或连续分布的任意数量终点的试验。我们使用最近提出的用于具有二进制毒性终点的 I 期联合试验和具有二进制毒性和连续疗效的 I/II 期联合试验的剂量探索设计来说明基准的效用。