• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种肿瘤临床试验的混合设计剂量探索。

A hybrid design for dose-finding oncology clinical trials.

机构信息

Incyte Corporation, Wilmington, Delaware, USA.

Merck & Co., Inc., North Wales, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;151(9):1602-1610. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34203. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.34203
PMID:35802470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10084431/
Abstract

Identifying the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommending a Phase II dose for an investigational treatment is crucial in cancer drug development. A suboptimal dose often leads to a failed late-stage trial, while an overly toxic dose causes harm to patients. There is a very rich literature on trial designs for dose-finding oncology clinical trials. We propose a novel hybrid design that maximizes the merits and minimizes the limitations of the existing designs. Building on two existing dose-finding designs: a model-assisted design (the modified toxicity probability interval) and a dose-toxicity model-based design, a hybrid design of the modified toxicity probability interval design and a dose-toxicity model such as the logistic regression model is proposed, incorporating optimal properties from these existing approaches. The performance of the hybrid design was tested in a real trial example and through simulation scenarios. The hybrid design controlled the overdosing toxicity well and led to a recommended dose closer to the true MTD due to its ability to calibrate for an intermediate dose. The robust performance of the proposed hybrid design is illustrated through the real trial dataset and simulations. The simulation results demonstrated that the proposed hybrid design can achieve excellent and robust operating characteristics compared to other existing designs and can be an effective model for determining the MTD and recommended Phase II dose in oncology dose-finding trials. For practical feasibility, an R-shiny tool was developed and is freely available to guide clinicians in every step of the dose finding process.

摘要

确定最大耐受剂量(MTD)并为研究性治疗推荐 II 期剂量对于癌症药物开发至关重要。剂量不足往往导致晚期试验失败,而毒性过大的剂量则会对患者造成伤害。在肿瘤临床试验剂量探索的试验设计方面有非常丰富的文献。我们提出了一种新颖的混合设计,最大限度地发挥现有设计的优点,同时最小化其局限性。在两种现有的剂量探索设计(改良毒性概率区间设计和基于剂量毒性模型的设计)的基础上,提出了改良毒性概率区间设计和基于剂量毒性模型(如逻辑回归模型)的混合设计,合并了这些现有方法的最优特性。混合设计的性能在真实试验示例和模拟场景中进行了测试。混合设计通过调整中间剂量,很好地控制了过度剂量毒性,从而推荐了更接近真实 MTD 的剂量。通过真实试验数据集和模拟结果说明了所提出的混合设计具有稳健的性能。模拟结果表明,与其他现有设计相比,所提出的混合设计可以实现卓越且稳健的操作特性,并且可以成为肿瘤学剂量探索试验中确定 MTD 和推荐 II 期剂量的有效模型。为了实现实际可行性,开发了一个 R-shiny 工具,免费提供给临床医生,以指导他们在剂量探索过程的每一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206f/10084431/8e0d6dd12ac0/IJC-151-1602-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206f/10084431/b95b7813a739/IJC-151-1602-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206f/10084431/8e0d6dd12ac0/IJC-151-1602-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206f/10084431/b95b7813a739/IJC-151-1602-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/206f/10084431/8e0d6dd12ac0/IJC-151-1602-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A hybrid design for dose-finding oncology clinical trials.一种肿瘤临床试验的混合设计剂量探索。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;151(9):1602-1610. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34203. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
2
The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies.在样本量较小的剂量发现研究中使用 3+3 设计:陷阱及可能的补救措施。
Clin Trials. 2024 Jun;21(3):350-357. doi: 10.1177/17407745241240401. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
3
STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.斯坦因:用于无缝I/II期临床试验的简单毒性和疗效区间设计。
Stat Med. 2017 Nov 20;36(26):4106-4120. doi: 10.1002/sim.7428. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
4
Hybrid continuous reassessment method with overdose control for safer dose escalation.带有过量控制的混合连续评估方法,用于更安全的剂量递增。
J Biopharm Stat. 2023 Sep 3;33(5):586-595. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2170401. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
5
Optimal phase I dose-escalation trial designs in oncology--a simulation study.肿瘤学中最优的I期剂量递增试验设计——一项模拟研究。
Stat Med. 2008 Nov 20;27(26):5329-44. doi: 10.1002/sim.3037.
6
Bayesian interval-based oncology dose-finding design with repeated quasi-continuous toxicity model.基于贝叶斯区间的肿瘤剂量递增设计,采用重复准连续毒性模型。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Mar;102:106265. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106265. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
7
[Introduction of Oncology Dose-Finding Trial Designs].[肿瘤学剂量探索试验设计介绍]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2022 Apr;49(4):365-370.
8
Adaptive design for identifying maximum tolerated dose early to accelerate dose-finding trial.用于早期识别最大耐受剂量以加速剂量发现试验的适应性设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Apr 6;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01584-y.
9
TEPI-2 and UBI: designs for optimal immuno-oncology and cell therapy dose finding with toxicity and efficacy.TEPI-2 和 UBI:具有毒性和疗效的最佳免疫肿瘤学和细胞治疗剂量发现设计。
J Biopharm Stat. 2020 Nov 1;30(6):979-992. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2020.1814802. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
10
A practical Bayesian design to identify the maximum tolerated dose contour for drug combination trials.一种用于确定药物联合试验最大耐受剂量轮廓的实用贝叶斯设计。
Stat Med. 2016 Nov 30;35(27):4924-4936. doi: 10.1002/sim.7095. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Three steps toward dose optimization for oncology dose finding.肿瘤剂量探索中实现剂量优化的三个步骤。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jun 24;40:101329. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101329. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative review of novel model-assisted designs for phase I clinical trials.新型模型辅助设计在 I 期临床试验中的比较综述。
Stat Med. 2018 Jun 30;37(14):2208-2222. doi: 10.1002/sim.7674. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
2
Accuracy, Safety, and Reliability of Novel Phase I Trial Designs.新型 I 期临床试验设计的准确性、安全性和可靠性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4357-4364. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0168. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
Keyboard: A Novel Bayesian Toxicity Probability Interval Design for Phase I Clinical Trials.《键盘:一种用于I期临床试验的新型贝叶斯毒性概率区间设计》
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 1;23(15):3994-4003. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0220. Epub 2017 May 25.
4
A Bayesian interval dose-finding design addressingOckham's razor: mTPI-2.一种解决奥卡姆剃刀问题的贝叶斯区间剂量探索设计:mTPI-2。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Jul;58:23-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials.贝叶斯最优区间设计:一种用于I期肿瘤试验的简单且性能良好的设计。
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 1;22(17):4291-301. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0592. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
6
Adaptive dose modification for phase I clinical trials.I期临床试验的适应性剂量调整。
Stat Med. 2016 Sep 10;35(20):3497-508. doi: 10.1002/sim.6933. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
7
Modified toxicity probability interval design: a safer and more reliable method than the 3 + 3 design for practical phase I trials.改良毒性概率区间设计:比 3+3 设计更安全、更可靠的实用 I 期临床试验方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 May 10;31(14):1785-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.7903. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
8
A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials.改良毒性概率区间法在探索性剂量试验中的应用。
Clin Trials. 2010 Dec;7(6):653-63. doi: 10.1177/1740774510382799. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
9
Range and trend of expected toxicity level (ETL) in standard A + B designs: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.标准 A + B 设计中预期毒性水平 (ETL) 的范围和趋势:来自儿童肿瘤学组的报告。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Mar;30(2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
10
Critical aspects of the Bayesian approach to phase I cancer trials.贝叶斯方法在I期癌症试验中的关键方面。
Stat Med. 2008 Jun 15;27(13):2420-39. doi: 10.1002/sim.3230.