Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 28;11(1):13418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92960-z.
In patients intubated for hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) related to novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), we retrospectively compared two weaning strategies, early extubation with immediate non-invasive ventilation (NIV) versus standard weaning encompassing spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), with respect to IMV duration (primary endpoint), extubation failures and reintubations, rate of tracheostomy, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and mortality (additional endpoints). All COVID-19 adult patients, intubated for hypoxemic ARF and subsequently extubated, were enrolled. Patients were included in two groups, early extubation followed by immediate NIV application, and conventionally weaning after passing SBT. 121 patients were enrolled and analyzed, 66 early extubated and 55 conventionally weaned after passing an SBT. IMV duration was 9 [6-11] days in early extubated patients versus 11 [6-15] days in standard weaning group (p = 0.034). Extubation failures [12 (18.2%) vs. 25 (45.5%), p = 0.002] and reintubations [12 (18.2%) vs. 22 (40.0%) p = 0.009] were fewer in early extubation compared to the standard weaning groups, respectively. Rate of tracheostomy, ICU mortality, and ICU length of stay were no different between groups. Compared to standard weaning, early extubation followed by immediate NIV shortened IMV duration and reduced the rate of extubation failure and reintubation.
在因新型冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 导致低氧性急性呼吸衰竭 (ARF) 而插管的患者中,我们回顾性比较了两种撤机策略,即早期拔管后立即行无创通气 (NIV) 与包括自主呼吸试验 (SBT) 的标准撤机,比较了有创机械通气 (IMV) 时间 (主要终点)、拔管失败和再插管、气管切开术率、重症监护病房 (ICU) 住院时间和死亡率 (附加终点)。所有因低氧性 ARF 插管并随后拔管的 COVID-19 成年患者均被纳入研究。患者被分为两组,一组为早期拔管后立即行 NIV 治疗,另一组为通过 SBT 后常规撤机。共纳入并分析了 121 例患者,其中 66 例早期拔管并立即行 NIV,55 例通过 SBT 后常规撤机。早期拔管组的 IMV 时间为 9 [6-11] 天,而标准撤机组为 11 [6-15] 天 (p = 0.034)。早期拔管组拔管失败 [12 (18.2%) vs. 25 (45.5%),p = 0.002] 和再插管 [12 (18.2%) vs. 22 (40.0%),p = 0.009] 发生率均低于标准撤机组。气管切开术率、ICU 死亡率和 ICU 住院时间在两组间无差异。与标准撤机相比,早期拔管后立即行 NIV 可缩短 IMV 时间,并降低拔管失败和再插管的发生率。