• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期拔管联合即刻无创通气与常规撤机方案在 2019 冠状病毒病患者中的应用:一项回顾性多中心研究。

Early extubation with immediate non-invasive ventilation versus standard weaning in intubated patients for coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective multicenter study.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, AAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Maggiore della Carità", Novara, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 28;11(1):13418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92960-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-92960-z
PMID:34183764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8239031/
Abstract

In patients intubated for hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (ARF) related to novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), we retrospectively compared two weaning strategies, early extubation with immediate non-invasive ventilation (NIV) versus standard weaning encompassing spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), with respect to IMV duration (primary endpoint), extubation failures and reintubations, rate of tracheostomy, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and mortality (additional endpoints). All COVID-19 adult patients, intubated for hypoxemic ARF and subsequently extubated, were enrolled. Patients were included in two groups, early extubation followed by immediate NIV application, and conventionally weaning after passing SBT. 121 patients were enrolled and analyzed, 66 early extubated and 55 conventionally weaned after passing an SBT. IMV duration was 9 [6-11] days in early extubated patients versus 11 [6-15] days in standard weaning group (p = 0.034). Extubation failures [12 (18.2%) vs. 25 (45.5%), p = 0.002] and reintubations [12 (18.2%) vs. 22 (40.0%) p = 0.009] were fewer in early extubation compared to the standard weaning groups, respectively. Rate of tracheostomy, ICU mortality, and ICU length of stay were no different between groups. Compared to standard weaning, early extubation followed by immediate NIV shortened IMV duration and reduced the rate of extubation failure and reintubation.

摘要

在因新型冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 导致低氧性急性呼吸衰竭 (ARF) 而插管的患者中,我们回顾性比较了两种撤机策略,即早期拔管后立即行无创通气 (NIV) 与包括自主呼吸试验 (SBT) 的标准撤机,比较了有创机械通气 (IMV) 时间 (主要终点)、拔管失败和再插管、气管切开术率、重症监护病房 (ICU) 住院时间和死亡率 (附加终点)。所有因低氧性 ARF 插管并随后拔管的 COVID-19 成年患者均被纳入研究。患者被分为两组,一组为早期拔管后立即行 NIV 治疗,另一组为通过 SBT 后常规撤机。共纳入并分析了 121 例患者,其中 66 例早期拔管并立即行 NIV,55 例通过 SBT 后常规撤机。早期拔管组的 IMV 时间为 9 [6-11] 天,而标准撤机组为 11 [6-15] 天 (p = 0.034)。早期拔管组拔管失败 [12 (18.2%) vs. 25 (45.5%),p = 0.002] 和再插管 [12 (18.2%) vs. 22 (40.0%),p = 0.009] 发生率均低于标准撤机组。气管切开术率、ICU 死亡率和 ICU 住院时间在两组间无差异。与标准撤机相比,早期拔管后立即行 NIV 可缩短 IMV 时间,并降低拔管失败和再插管的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b3/8239031/8b3c824e5c97/41598_2021_92960_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b3/8239031/e042d4a3aedd/41598_2021_92960_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b3/8239031/8b3c824e5c97/41598_2021_92960_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b3/8239031/e042d4a3aedd/41598_2021_92960_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b3/8239031/8b3c824e5c97/41598_2021_92960_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Early extubation with immediate non-invasive ventilation versus standard weaning in intubated patients for coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective multicenter study.早期拔管联合即刻无创通气与常规撤机方案在 2019 冠状病毒病患者中的应用:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 28;11(1):13418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92960-z.
2
Early extubation followed by immediate noninvasive ventilation vs. standard extubation in hypoxemic patients: a randomized clinical trial.早期拔管后立即行无创通气与常规拔管在低氧血症患者中的随机临床试验
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jan;45(1):62-71. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5478-0. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
3
Automated weaning and SBT systems versus non-automated weaning strategies for weaning time in invasively ventilated critically ill adults.针对有创通气的危重症成年患者,比较自动撤机和自主呼吸试验(SBT)系统与非自动撤机策略对撤机时间的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 9;2014(9):CD008638. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008638.pub2.
4
Intermittent noninvasive ventilation after extubation in patients with chronic respiratory disorders: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (VHYPER).慢性呼吸疾病患者拔管后间歇性无创通气:一项多中心随机对照试验(VHYPRE)。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1626-1636. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4785-1. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
5
Protocolised non-invasive compared with invasive weaning from mechanical ventilation for adults in intensive care: the Breathe RCT.协议化的无创通气与有创通气撤机比较用于 ICU 成人:Breathe RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(48):1-114. doi: 10.3310/hta23480.
6
Noninvasive ventilation immediately after extubation improves weaning outcome after acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial.拔管后立即进行无创通气可改善急性呼吸衰竭后的撤机结局:一项随机对照试验。
Crit Care. 2013 Mar 4;17(2):R39. doi: 10.1186/cc12549.
7
Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure.无创正压通气作为呼吸衰竭成年插管患者的撤机策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 9;2013(12):CD004127. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004127.pub3.
8
Noninvasive ventilation after early extubation in patients recovering from hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a single-centre feasibility study.低氧性急性呼吸衰竭患者早期拔管后行无创通气:单中心可行性研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Oct;38(10):1599-606. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2652-7. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
9
Effect of Protocolized Weaning With Early Extubation to Noninvasive Ventilation vs Invasive Weaning on Time to Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Respiratory Failure: The Breathe Randomized Clinical Trial.协议撤机联合早期拔管与有创撤机对呼吸衰竭患者机械通气撤机时间的影响:Breathe 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1881-1888. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13763.
10
Automated weaning and spontaneous breathing trial systems versus non-automated weaning strategies for discontinuation time in invasively ventilated postoperative adults.用于评估有创通气的术后成年患者撤机时间的自动撤机和自主呼吸试验系统与非自动撤机策略的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 13;2014(2):CD008639. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008639.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The COVID-19 Tracheostomy Experience at a Large Academic Medical Center in New York during the First Year.纽约一家大型学术医疗中心第一年的新冠气管造口术经验
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 7;13(7):2130. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072130.
2
Extubation failure and the use of noninvasive ventilation during the weaning process in critically ill COVID-19 patients.危重症 COVID-19 患者在脱机过程中发生拔管失败和使用无创通气。
Crit Care Sci. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):163-167. doi: 10.5935/2965-2774.20230009-en.
3
Research on SARS-COV-2 pandemic: a narrative review focused on the Italian contribution.

本文引用的文献

1
Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review.新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)的病理生理学、传播、诊断和治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2020 Aug 25;324(8):782-793. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839.
2
COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: is a different approach to management warranted?COVID-19 相关的急性呼吸窘迫综合征:是否需要采取不同的治疗方法?
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):816-821. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30304-0. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
Caution about early intubation and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19.
2019冠状病毒病大流行研究:一项聚焦意大利贡献的叙述性综述
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2021 Nov 17;1(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s44158-021-00017-4.
4
Predictive Accuracy of the ROX Index for Re-Intubation in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19.新冠肺炎机械通气患者再插管的 ROX 指数预测准确性。
Respir Care. 2023 Aug;68(8):1067-1074. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10549. Epub 2023 May 16.
5
Characteristics of unvaccinated and vaccinated critically ill COVID-19 patients in calabria region (Italy): A retrospective study.意大利卡拉布里亚地区未接种疫苗和接种疫苗的危重症 COVID-19 患者的特征:一项回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 24;9:1042411. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1042411. eCollection 2022.
6
Bivalirudin vs. Enoxaparin in Intubated COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.比伐芦定与依诺肝素用于插管的COVID-19患者:一项多中心随机对照试验试点研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 11;11(20):5992. doi: 10.3390/jcm11205992.
7
Non-Invasive Ventilation as a Therapy Option for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Acute Cardiopulmonary Oedema in Emergency Medical Services.无创通气作为紧急医疗服务中慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重和急性心源性肺水肿的一种治疗选择。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 29;11(9):2504. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092504.
8
Comfort During Non-invasive Ventilation.无创通气期间的舒适度。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 24;9:874250. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.874250. eCollection 2022.
9
Chest X-ray Does Not Predict the Risk of Endotracheal Intubation and Escalation of Treatment in COVID-19 Patients Requiring Noninvasive Respiratory Support.胸部X光无法预测需要无创呼吸支持的COVID-19患者的气管插管风险和治疗升级情况。
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 16;11(6):1636. doi: 10.3390/jcm11061636.
10
Effect of awake prone position on diaphragmatic thickening fraction in patients assisted by noninvasive ventilation for hypoxemic acute respiratory failure related to novel coronavirus disease.新型冠状病毒病所致低氧性急性呼吸衰竭患者接受无创通气辅助时清醒俯卧位对膈肌增厚分数的影响。
Crit Care. 2021 Aug 24;25(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03735-x.
关于新型冠状病毒肺炎早期插管和机械通气的注意事项。
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jun 9;10(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00692-6.
4
Managing ICU surge during the COVID-19 crisis: rapid guidelines.管理 COVID-19 危机期间的 ICU 激增:快速指南。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jul;46(7):1303-1325. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06092-5. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
5
Critical Care Surge Capacity to Respond to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: A Rapid and Affordable Solution in the Novara Hospital.意大利应对 COVID-19 大流行的重症监护能力:诺瓦拉医院的快速且经济实惠的解决方案。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020 Aug;35(4):431-433. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X20000692. Epub 2020 May 19.
6
Management of COVID-19 Respiratory Distress.新型冠状病毒肺炎呼吸窘迫的管理
JAMA. 2020 Jun 9;323(22):2329-2330. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6825.
7
Early consensus management for non-ICU acute respiratory failure SARS-CoV-2 emergency in Italy: from ward to trenches.意大利非 ICU 急性呼吸衰竭 SARS-CoV-2 紧急情况下的早期共识管理:从病房到战壕。
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 21;55(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00632-2020. Print 2020 May.
8
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国武汉成人 COVID-19 住院患者的临床病程和死亡危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
9
Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.《武汉 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎 138 例住院患者临床特征分析》
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585.
10
A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin.一种新型冠状病毒引发的肺炎疫情,该病毒可能来源于蝙蝠。
Nature. 2020 Mar;579(7798):270-273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. Epub 2020 Feb 3.