Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Jun 28;36(25):e172. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e172.
Inter-hospital transfer (IHT) for emergency department (ED) admission is a burden to high-level EDs. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and ED utilization patterns of patients who underwent single and double IHTs at high-level EDs in South Korea.
This nationwide cross-sectional study analyzed data from the National Emergency Department Information System for the period of 2016-2018. All the patients who underwent IHT at Level I and II emergency centers during this time period were included. The patients were categorized into the single-transfer and double-transfer groups. The clinical characteristics and ED utilization patterns were compared between the two groups.
We found that 2.1% of the patients in the ED (n = 265,046) underwent IHTs; 18.1% of the pediatric patients (n = 3,556), and 24.2% of the adult patients (n = 59,498) underwent double transfers. Both pediatric (median, 141.0 vs. 208.0 minutes, < 0.001) and adult (median, 189.0 vs. 308.0 minutes, < 0.001) patients in the double-transfer group had longer duration of stay in the EDs. Patient's request was the reason for transfer in 41.9% of all IHTs (111,076 of 265,046). Unavailability of medical resources was the reason for transfer in 30.0% of the double transfers (18,920 of 64,054).
The incidence of double-transfer of patients is increasing. The main reasons for double transfers were patient's request and unavailability of medical resources at the first-transfer hospitals. Emergency physicians and policymakers should focus on lowering the number of preventable double transfers.
急诊部(ED)的院内转院(IHT)对高级 ED 来说是一种负担。本研究旨在评估韩国高级 ED 中接受单次和双次 IHT 的患者的患病率和 ED 利用模式。
这是一项全国性的横断面研究,分析了 2016-2018 年国家急诊部信息系统的数据。在此期间,所有在一级和二级急救中心接受 IHT 的患者均包括在内。患者分为单次转移和双次转移两组。比较两组患者的临床特征和 ED 利用模式。
我们发现,ED 中有 2.1%的患者(n=265046)接受了 IHT;18.1%的儿科患者(n=3556)和 24.2%的成年患者(n=59498)接受了双次转移。儿科患者(中位数,141.0 与 208.0 分钟,<0.001)和成年患者(中位数,189.0 与 308.0 分钟,<0.001)在双次转移组中在 ED 的停留时间都更长。所有 IHT 中,41.9%(265046 例中的 111076 例)的转院原因是患者的要求。双次转移中,30.0%(64054 例中的 18920 例)的转院原因是第一转院医院的医疗资源不足。
患者双次转移的发生率正在增加。双次转移的主要原因是患者的要求和第一转院医院的医疗资源不足。急诊医师和政策制定者应关注降低可预防的双次转移数量。