Chung Je Young, Choi Yuri, Jeong Jinwoo, Lee Sung Woo, Han Kap Su, Kim Su Jin, Kim Won Young, Kang Hyunggoo, Hong Eun Seog
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Emerg Med Int. 2022 Aug 27;2022:2662956. doi: 10.1155/2022/2662956. eCollection 2022.
This study aimed to elucidate whether direct transport of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients to higher-level emergency medical centres (EMCs) would result in better survival compared to resuscitation in smaller local emergency departments (EDs) and subsequent transfer.
This study was a retrospective population-based analysis of cases registered in the national database of 2019. This study investigated the immediate results of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for OHCA compared between EMCs and EDs and the results of therapeutic temperature management (TTM) compared between the patients directly transported from the field and those transferred from other hospitals. In-hospital mortality was compared using multivariate logistic regression.
From the population dataset, 11,493 OHCA patients were extracted. (8,912 in the EMC group vs. 2,581 in the ED group). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the odds for ED mortality were lower with treatment in EDs than with treatment in EMCs. (odds ratio 0.712 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.638-0.796)). From the study dataset, 1,798 patients who received TTM were extracted. (1,164 in the direct visit group vs. 634 in the transferred group). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the odds ratio for overall mortality was 1.411 (95% CI: 0.809-2.446) in the transferred group. ( = 0.220).
The immediate outcome of OHCA patients who were transported to EDs was not inferior to that of EMCs. Therefore, it would be acceptable to transport OHCA patients to the nearest emergency facilities rather than to the specialized centres in distant areas.
本研究旨在阐明与在较小的当地急诊科(EDs)进行复苏并随后转运相比,将院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者直接转运至更高层级的急诊医疗中心(EMCs)是否会带来更好的生存结果。
本研究是对2019年国家数据库中登记病例进行的基于人群的回顾性分析。本研究调查了EMCs和EDs之间OHCA心肺复苏的即时结果,以及现场直接转运患者与从其他医院转运患者之间的治疗性体温管理(TTM)结果。使用多因素逻辑回归比较院内死亡率。
从人群数据集中提取了11493例OHCA患者。(EMC组8912例,ED组2581例)。多因素逻辑回归显示,在EDs接受治疗的患者ED死亡率的比值低于在EMCs接受治疗的患者。(比值比0.712(95%置信区间(CI):0.638 - 0.796))。从研究数据集中提取了1798例接受TTM的患者。(直接就诊组1164例,转运组634例)。多因素回归分析显示,转运组的总体死亡率比值比为1.411(95% CI:0.809 - 2.446)。(P = 0.220)。
转运至EDs的OHCA患者的即时结局并不劣于EMCs的患者。因此,将OHCA患者转运至最近的急救设施而非远处的专科医院是可以接受的。