Center for Children and Families, Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Addiction. 2022 Feb;117(2):392-410. doi: 10.1111/add.15626. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
Although poor decision-making (DM) has been correlated with problematic cannabis use (CU), cross-sectional designs make it difficult to determine whether poor DM represents an antecedent and/or consequence of CU. The current study measured bidirectional associations between CU and DM among adolescents over 2 years and compared these findings to those observed with episodic memory, which is consistently reported as a consequence of CU. We also measured the role of DM as a risk factor for cannabis use disorder (CUD) onset.
Two-year longitudinal study with five bi-annual assessments.
Participants were 401 adolescents aged 14-17 years at baseline.
Miami, Florida, USA.
CU frequency and CUDs were assessed at each time-point through the Drug Use History Questionnaire and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, respectively. Neurocognition was assessed at odd time-points throughout the Iowa Gambling Task, Game of Dice Task and Cups Task [decision-making (DM)] and the Wechsler Memory Scale IV and California Verbal Learning Test II (episodic memory). We used latent growth curve modeling to examine bidirectional influences between CU and neurocognition over time. We applied discrete time survival analyses to determine whether baseline DM predicted CUD onset.
Greater lifetime CU frequency was associated with poorer episodic memory at baseline (bs = -14.84, -16.44, Ps = 0.038, 0.021). Greater CU escalation predicted lesser gains in immediate episodic memory (b = -0.05, P = 0.020). Baseline DM did not predict CU escalation (b = 0.07, P = 0.421), nor did escalation in CU predict changes in DM (b = 0.02, P = 0.352). Baseline DM also did not predict CUD onset (adjusted OR = 1.01, 95% confidence interval = 0.98-1.06).
This study replicates findings that poorer episodic memory in adolescents appears to be a consequence of cannabis use, even among adolescents at earlier stages of use. Poor decision-making does not appear to be either a consequence of or a risk factor for escalating cannabis use or onset of cannabis use disorder among adolescents.
尽管不良决策(DM)与问题性大麻使用(CU)相关,但横断面设计使得确定 DM 是 CU 的前提和/或后果变得困难。本研究在两年内测量了青少年 CU 和 DM 之间的双向关联,并将这些发现与发作性记忆进行了比较,后者一致被报告为 CU 的后果。我们还测量了 DM 作为大麻使用障碍(CUD)发病风险因素的作用。
具有 5 次两年期评估的纵向研究。
参与者为 401 名年龄在 14-17 岁的青少年。
美国佛罗里达州迈阿密。
通过药物使用历史问卷和 DSM-IV 结构化临床访谈分别在每个时间点评估 CU 频率和 CUD。神经认知在整个爱荷华赌博任务、骰子任务和杯子任务(决策(DM))以及韦氏记忆量表第四版和加利福尼亚语言学习测试第二版(发作性记忆)奇数时间点进行评估。我们使用潜在增长曲线模型来研究 CU 和神经认知随时间的双向影响。我们应用离散时间生存分析来确定基线 DM 是否预测 CUD 发病。
终生 CU 频率越高,基线时的发作性记忆越差(bs=-14.84,-16.44,P=0.038,0.021)。CU 升级预测即刻发作性记忆的收益减少(b=-0.05,P=0.020)。基线 DM 不预测 CU 升级(b=0.07,P=0.421),CU 升级也不预测 DM 的变化(b=0.02,P=0.352)。基线 DM 也不能预测 CUD 的发病(调整后的 OR=1.01,95%置信区间=0.98-1.06)。
本研究复制了青少年较差的发作性记忆似乎是大麻使用的后果的发现,即使在使用大麻处于早期阶段的青少年中也是如此。在青少年中,不良决策似乎既不是大麻使用升级的后果,也不是大麻使用障碍发病的风险因素。