• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麻使用的起始年龄与不确定性下的决策

Age of onset of cannabis use and decision making under uncertainty.

作者信息

Alameda-Bailén Jose Ramón, Salguero-Alcañiz Pilar, Merchán-Clavellino Ana, Paíno-Quesada Susana

机构信息

Basic Psychology, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain.

Basic Psychology, University of Cádiz, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2018 Jul 3;6:e5201. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5201. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.5201
PMID:30002988
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6034599/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Cannabis, like other substances, negatively affects health, inducing respiratory problems and mental and cognitive alterations. Memory and learning disorders, as well as executive dysfunctions, are also neuropsychological disorders associated to cannabis use. Recent evidence reveals that cannabis use during adolescence may disrupt the normal development of the brain. This study is aimed to analyze possible differences between early-onset and late-onset cannabis consumers.

METHOD

We used a task based on a card game with four decks and different programs of gains/losses. A total of 72 subjects (19 women; 53 men) participated in the study; they were selected through a purposive sampling and divided into three groups: early-onset consumers, late-onset consumers, and control (non-consumers). The task used was the "Cartas" program (computerized version based on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT)), with two versions: direct and inverse. The computational model "Prospect Valence Learning" (PVL) was applied in order to describe the decision according to four characteristics: utility, loss aversion, recency, and consistency.

RESULTS

The results evidence worst performance in the IGT in the early-onset consumers as compared to late-onset consumers and control. Differences between groups were also found in the PVL computational model parameters, since the process of decision making of the early-onset consumers was more influenced by the magnitude of the gains-losses, and more determined by short-term results without loss aversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Early onset cannabis use may involve decision-making problems, and therefore intervention programs are necessary in order to reduce the prevalence and delay the onset of cannabis use among teenagers.

摘要

目的

大麻与其他物质一样,会对健康产生负面影响,引发呼吸问题以及精神和认知改变。记忆和学习障碍以及执行功能障碍也是与大麻使用相关的神经心理障碍。最近的证据表明,青少年时期使用大麻可能会扰乱大脑的正常发育。本研究旨在分析早发性和晚发性大麻使用者之间可能存在的差异。

方法

我们使用了一个基于纸牌游戏的任务,有四副牌以及不同的输赢程序。共有72名受试者(19名女性;53名男性)参与了该研究;他们通过目的抽样被选中,并分为三组:早发性使用者、晚发性使用者和对照组(非使用者)。所使用的任务是“Cartas”程序(基于爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)的计算机化版本),有直接和反向两个版本。应用了计算模型“前景效价学习”(PVL),以便根据效用、损失厌恶、近期性和一致性这四个特征来描述决策。

结果

结果表明,与晚发性使用者和对照组相比,早发性使用者在IGT中的表现更差。在PVL计算模型参数中也发现了组间差异,因为早发性使用者的决策过程更容易受到得失幅度的影响,并且更多地由短期结果决定,而没有损失厌恶。

结论

早发性大麻使用可能涉及决策问题,因此有必要开展干预项目,以降低青少年中大麻使用的流行率并延迟其使用起始时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/1153626bd09c/peerj-06-5201-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/f1c350b6139c/peerj-06-5201-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/e5a3f89ae700/peerj-06-5201-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/6e7ec3facdd3/peerj-06-5201-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/46ddf525907a/peerj-06-5201-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/57824669cd30/peerj-06-5201-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/1153626bd09c/peerj-06-5201-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/f1c350b6139c/peerj-06-5201-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/e5a3f89ae700/peerj-06-5201-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/6e7ec3facdd3/peerj-06-5201-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/46ddf525907a/peerj-06-5201-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/57824669cd30/peerj-06-5201-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f3a2/6034599/1153626bd09c/peerj-06-5201-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Age of onset of cannabis use and decision making under uncertainty.大麻使用的起始年龄与不确定性下的决策
PeerJ. 2018 Jul 3;6:e5201. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5201. eCollection 2018.
2
[Cognitive mechanisms in risky decision-making in cannabis users].[大麻使用者风险决策中的认知机制]
Adicciones. 2014;26(2):146-58.
3
Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying Risky Decision-Making in Chronic Cannabis Users.慢性大麻使用者风险决策背后的认知机制。
J Math Psychol. 2010 Feb 1;54(1):28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.10.002.
4
Decision-making deficits in patients with chronic schizophrenia: Iowa Gambling Task and Prospect Valence Learning model.慢性精神分裂症患者的决策缺陷:爱荷华赌博任务与预期效价学习模型。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Apr 22;12:1019-27. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S103821. eCollection 2016.
5
[Decision making in cannabis users].[大麻使用者的决策制定]
Adicciones. 2012;24(2):161-72.
6
Early stages of the acute physical stress response increase loss aversion and learning on decision making: A Bayesian approach.急性生理应激反应早期增加了损失规避和决策学习:一种贝叶斯方法。
Physiol Behav. 2021 Aug 1;237:113459. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113459. Epub 2021 May 12.
7
Strategic and non-strategic problem gamblers differ on decision-making under risk and ambiguity.策略性和非策略性赌徒在风险和模糊情境下的决策存在差异。
Addiction. 2014 Jul;109(7):1128-37. doi: 10.1111/add.12494. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
8
Cognitive processes underlying impaired decision-making under uncertainty in gambling disorder.赌博障碍中不确定性下决策受损背后的认知过程。
Addict Behav. 2014 Oct;39(10):1533-6. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
9
Seeing the forest through the trees: improving decision making on the Iowa gambling task by shifting focus from short- to long-term outcomes.见树又见林:通过关注长期结果而非短期结果,改善在爱荷华赌博任务中的决策制定。
Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 18;4:773. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00773. eCollection 2013.
10
Underlying decision making processes on Iowa Gambling Task.潜在的决策过程在爱荷华赌博任务中。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Jan;39:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the relationship between frequent cannabis use, belief updating under uncertainty and psychotic-like symptoms.探索频繁使用大麻、不确定性下的信念更新与类精神病症状之间的关系。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 24;15:1309868. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1309868. eCollection 2024.
2
The Iowa Gambling Task: Men and Women Perform Differently. A Meta-analysis.爱荷华赌博任务:男性和女性表现不同。一项元分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Mar;35(1):211-231. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09637-3. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cannabis use in young adults and general population: a systematic review].

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive Mechanisms in Decision-Making in Patients With Mild Alzheimer Disease.轻度阿尔茨海默病患者决策中的认知机制
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2017;14(12):1248-1255. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666170417113834.
2
Reward processing and mood-related symptoms: An RDoC and translational neuroscience perspective.奖赏处理与情绪相关症状:基于研究领域标准(RDoC)和转化神经科学的视角
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jul;216:3-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
3
Anodal Stimulation of the Left DLPFC Increases IGT Scores and Decreases Delay Discounting Rate in Healthy Males.
[新冠疫情对年轻人及普通人群大麻使用的影响:一项系统综述]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2023 Dec 11;97:e202312106.
4
Risky decision-making as an antecedent or consequence of adolescent cannabis use: findings from a 2-year longitudinal study.冒险决策是青少年使用大麻的前因还是后果:一项为期 2 年的纵向研究结果。
Addiction. 2022 Feb;117(2):392-410. doi: 10.1111/add.15626. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
5
Cannabis Seeds Authentication by Chloroplast and Nuclear DNA Analysis Coupled with High-Resolution Melting Method for Quality Control Purposes.叶绿体和核 DNA 分析结合高分辨率熔解法鉴定大麻籽用于质量控制目的。
Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2022 Aug;7(4):548-556. doi: 10.1089/can.2020.0168. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Decision Making Profile of Positive and Negative Anticipatory Skin Conductance Responders in an Unlimited-Time Version of the IGT.在无限时长版爱荷华赌博任务中,正负预期性皮肤电传导反应者的决策概况。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 15;10:2237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02237. eCollection 2019.
7
Demographic, Cannabis Use, and Depressive Correlates of Cannabis Use Consequences in Regular Cannabis Users.经常使用大麻的人群的人口统计学特征、大麻使用情况及与大麻使用后果相关的抑郁因素。
Am J Addict. 2019 Jul;28(4):295-302. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12889. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
8
Exploring associations between early substance use and longitudinal socio-occupational functioning in young people engaged in a mental health service.探讨参与心理健康服务的年轻人中早期物质使用与纵向社会职业功能之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210877. eCollection 2019.
对健康男性左侧背外侧前额叶皮质进行阳极刺激可提高爱荷华博弈任务得分并降低延迟折扣率。
Front Psychol. 2016 Sep 20;7:1421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01421. eCollection 2016.
4
Effects of Cannabis Use on Human Behavior, Including Cognition, Motivation, and Psychosis: A Review.大麻使用对人类行为的影响,包括认知、动机和精神病:综述。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;73(3):292-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.3278.
5
The precision of value-based choices depends causally on fronto-parietal phase coupling.基于价值的选择的精确性在因果关系上取决于额顶叶相位耦合。
Nat Commun. 2015 Aug 20;6:8090. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9090.
6
Cannabis and adolescent brain development.大麻与青少年大脑发育。
Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Apr;148:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.11.009. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
7
[Cognitive mechanisms in risky decision-making in cannabis users].[大麻使用者风险决策中的认知机制]
Adicciones. 2014;26(2):146-58.
8
Decision-making in stimulant and opiate addicts in protracted abstinence: evidence from computational modeling with pure users.长期戒断的兴奋剂和阿片类药物成瘾者的决策:纯使用者计算模型的证据。
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 12;5:849. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00849. eCollection 2014.
9
Daily use, especially of high-potency cannabis, drives the earlier onset of psychosis in cannabis users.日常使用,尤其是高 potency 大麻,会促使大麻使用者更早出现精神病症状。 (注:“potency”常见释义为“效力;效能” ,这里结合语境可能指大麻的某种强度等特性,具体准确含义需结合更多背景知识确定 )
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Nov;40(6):1509-17. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt181. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
10
Decomposing the roles of perseveration and expected value representation in models of the Iowa gambling task.解析坚持性和期望价值表示在爱荷华赌博任务模型中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 30;4:640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00640. eCollection 2013.