Stuart Jamie, Chewins John, Tearle Jason
The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, UK.
Bioquell UK Limited, Andover, Hampshire, UK.
Appl Biosaf. 2020 Jun;25(2):83-89. doi: 10.1177/1535676020909998. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
The recent reclassification of formaldehyde as a presumed carcinogen prompted the investigation into the comparative efficacy of hydrogen peroxide as a fumigant in microbiological safety cabinets.
The aim of the study was to quantify the biocidal efficacy of formaldehyde fumigation, including variables such as exposure time and concentration, and then to compare this to the biocidal efficacy achieved from a hydrogen peroxide vapor fumigation system. The study also investigated the ability of both fumigants to permeate the microbiological safety cabinet (MBSC), including the workspace, under the work tray, and after the HEPA filters. Furthermore, the effect of organic soiling on efficacy was also assessed. Infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) was used as the biological target to develop this study model.
A model using IBV was developed to determine the efficacy of formaldehyde and hydrogen peroxide as fumigants. Virus was dried on stainless steel discs, and variables including concentration, time, protein soiling, and location within an MBSC were assessed.
It was demonstrated that formaldehyde fumigation could achieve a 6-log reduction in the titer of the virus throughout the cabinet, and high protein soiling in the presentation did not affect efficacy. Appropriate cycle parameters for the hydrogen peroxide system were developed, and when challenged with IBV, it was shown that vaporized hydrogen peroxide could achieve an equal 6-log titer reduction as formaldehyde within the cabinet workspace and overcome the presence of soiling.
Hydrogen peroxide was demonstrated to be a viable alternative to formaldehyde under most situations tested. However, the hydrogen peroxide system did not achieve an equal titer reduction above the cabinet's first HEPA filter using the cabinet workspace cycle, and further optimization of the hydrogen peroxide cycle parameters, including pulsing of the cabinet fans, may be required to achieve this.
近期甲醛被重新归类为疑似致癌物,这促使人们对过氧化氢作为微生物安全柜熏蒸剂的相对功效展开调查。
本研究的目的是量化甲醛熏蒸的杀菌效果,包括暴露时间和浓度等变量,然后将其与过氧化氢蒸汽熏蒸系统的杀菌效果进行比较。该研究还调查了这两种熏蒸剂渗透微生物安全柜(MBSC)的能力,包括工作区、工作盘下方以及高效空气过滤器(HEPA)之后的区域。此外,还评估了有机污垢对杀菌效果的影响。本研究模型以传染性支气管炎病毒(IBV)作为生物靶点。
建立了一个使用IBV的模型来确定甲醛和过氧化氢作为熏蒸剂的功效。将病毒干燥在不锈钢圆盘上,并评估包括浓度、时间、蛋白质污垢以及在MBSC内的位置等变量。
结果表明,甲醛熏蒸可使整个安全柜内的病毒滴度降低6个对数级,且样品中高蛋白污垢不影响杀菌效果。确定了过氧化氢系统的合适循环参数,在用IBV进行挑战试验时,结果表明汽化过氧化氢在安全柜工作区内可实现与甲醛同等程度的6个对数级滴度降低,并能克服污垢的影响。
在大多数测试情况下,过氧化氢被证明是甲醛的可行替代品。然而,使用安全柜工作区循环时,过氧化氢系统在安全柜第一个HEPA过滤器上方未实现同等程度的滴度降低,可能需要进一步优化过氧化氢循环参数,包括对安全柜风扇进行脉冲控制,以实现这一点。