• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二阶灾难?新冠疫情期间的数字技术

A Second-Order Disaster? Digital Technologies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Madianou Mirca

机构信息

Goldsmiths, University of London, UK.

出版信息

Soc Media Soc. 2020 Aug 6;6(3):2056305120948168. doi: 10.1177/2056305120948168. eCollection 2020 Jul.

DOI:10.1177/2056305120948168
PMID:34192027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7415940/
Abstract

One of the most striking features of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom has been the disproportionate way in which it has affected Black, Asian, ethnic minority, and working class people. In this article, I argue that digital technologies and data practices in the response to COVID-19 amplify social inequalities, which are already accentuated by the pandemic, thus leading to a "second-order disaster"-a human-made disaster which further traps disadvantaged people into precarity. Inequalities are reproduced both in the everyday uses of technology for distance learning and remote work as well as in the public health response. Applications such as contact tracing apps raise concerns about "function creep"-the reuse of data for different purposes than the one for which they were originally collected-while they normalize surveillance which has been traditionally used on marginalized communities. The outsourcing of the digital public health response consolidates the arrival of the privatized digital welfare state, which increases risks of potential discrimination.

摘要

英国新冠疫情最显著的特征之一是其对黑人、亚裔、少数族裔和工人阶级人群产生了不成比例的影响。在本文中,我认为应对新冠疫情时的数字技术和数据实践加剧了社会不平等,而这种不平等已经因疫情而加剧,从而导致了一场“二阶灾难”——一场人为灾难,它进一步使弱势群体陷入不稳定状态。不平等在技术用于远程学习和远程工作的日常使用中以及公共卫生应对中都得以重现。诸如接触者追踪应用程序之类的应用引发了对“功能蔓延”的担忧——即数据被用于与最初收集目的不同的其他目的——同时它们使传统上用于边缘化社区的监视行为常态化。数字公共卫生应对工作的外包巩固了私有化数字福利国家的到来,这增加了潜在歧视的风险。

相似文献

1
A Second-Order Disaster? Digital Technologies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.二阶灾难?新冠疫情期间的数字技术
Soc Media Soc. 2020 Aug 6;6(3):2056305120948168. doi: 10.1177/2056305120948168. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Digital Public Health Solutions in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Analysis of Contact Tracing Solutions Deployed in Japan and Germany.数字公共卫生解决方案应对 COVID-19 大流行:日本和德国部署的接触者追踪解决方案的比较分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 14;25:e44966. doi: 10.2196/44966.
3
Fear of panoptic surveillance: using digital technology to control the COVID-19 epidemic.全景监控恐惧:利用数字技术控制 COVID-19 疫情。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2020 Nov 25;9(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13584-020-00429-7.
4
An investigation of media reports of digital surveillance within the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.对新冠疫情大流行第一年期间数字监控的媒体报道进行的一项调查。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Jul 24;5:1215685. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1215685. eCollection 2023.
5
Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study.德语国家对 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的早期看法:比较混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25525. doi: 10.2196/25525.
6
Socioeconomic disadvantage and engagement with digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in Western Sydney: A secondary analysis of surveillance data.悉尼西部的社会经济劣势与新冠疫情数字接触者追踪参与情况:监测数据的二次分析
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2023 Oct;47(5):100087. doi: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100087. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
7
Resident Willingness to Participate in Digital Contact Tracing in a COVID-19 Hotspot: Findings From a Detroit Panel Study.居民参与新冠疫情热点地区数字接触者追踪的意愿:来自底特律小组研究的发现。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jan 19;9:e39002. doi: 10.2196/39002.
8
Ethics of digital contact tracing wearables.数字接触追踪可穿戴设备的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Sep;48(9):611-615. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106958. Epub 2021 May 14.
9
Digital mHealth and Virtual Care Use During COVID-19 in 4 Countries: Rapid Landscape Review.4个国家在新冠疫情期间数字移动医疗健康与虚拟护理的使用情况:快速全面综述
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 30;6(11):e26041. doi: 10.2196/26041.
10
Proportionate response to the COVID-19 threat? Use of apps and other technologies for monitoring employees under the European Union's data protection framework.对新冠疫情威胁的相称应对?在欧盟数据保护框架下利用应用程序及其他技术监测员工
Int Labour Rev. 2022 Jun;161(2):315-335. doi: 10.1111/ilr.12331. Epub 2022 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Short- and Long-Term Predicted and Witnessed Consequences of Digital Surveillance During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.新冠疫情期间数字监控的短期和长期预测及见证后果:范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 24;10:e47154. doi: 10.2196/47154.
2
Uptake and Utilization of the COVID-19 Alert App within a University Community in New York.纽约一所大学社区内新冠病毒警报应用程序的使用与利用情况
Innov Pharm. 2023 Nov 9;14(3). doi: 10.24926/iip.v14i3.5488. eCollection 2023.
3
Changes to Public Health Surveillance Methods Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.因 COVID-19 大流行而改变的公共卫生监测方法:范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jan 19;10:e49185. doi: 10.2196/49185.
4
Use of digital technologies for public health surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.COVID-19大流行期间数字技术在公共卫生监测中的应用:一项范围综述
Digit Health. 2023 May 17;9:20552076231173220. doi: 10.1177/20552076231173220. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Explaining citizens' resistance to use digital contact tracing apps: A mixed-methods study.解释公民对使用数字接触者追踪应用程序的抵触情绪:一项混合方法研究。
Int J Inf Manage. 2022 Apr;63:102468. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102468. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
6
COVID-19 surveillance in Israeli press: Spatiality, mobility, and control.以色列媒体对新冠疫情的监测:空间性、流动性与管控
Mob Media Commun. 2022 Sep;10(3):421-447. doi: 10.1177/20501579211068269.
7
Reasons for Nonuse, Discontinuation of Use, and Acceptance of Additional Functionalities of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Cross-sectional Survey Study.新冠接触者追踪应用程序的未使用、停用和接受额外功能的原因:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jan 14;8(1):e22113. doi: 10.2196/22113.
8
Discourse of the Post-COVID 19 New Deal in South Korea.韩国新冠疫情后新政论述
East Asia (Piscataway). 2021;38(4):373-388. doi: 10.1007/s12140-021-09363-0. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Inequalities in Children's Experiences of Home Learning during the COVID-19 Lockdown in England.英国新冠疫情封锁期间儿童居家学习经历的不平等现象。
Fisc Stud. 2020 Sep;41(3):653-683. doi: 10.1111/1475-5890.12240. Epub 2020 Nov 30.