• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个平台,万千世界:论意大利对新冠疫情早期反应中的推特反讽现象

One Platform, a Thousand Worlds: On Twitter Irony in the Early Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.

作者信息

Vicari Stefania, Murru Maria Francesca

机构信息

The University of Sheffield, UK.

The University of Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Soc Media Soc. 2020 Jul 30;6(3):2056305120948254. doi: 10.1177/2056305120948254. eCollection 2020 Jul.

DOI:10.1177/2056305120948254
PMID:34192038
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7399572/
Abstract

On 22 February 2020, 11 municipalities in Northern Italy became the first COVID-19 red zone of Europe. Two days later, when it became evident that the virus had been spreading in the country for weeks, Italy entered a "buffer zone," a temporal zone between normality and pandemic. The buffer zone lasted around 2 weeks and thrived with irony flowing on social media through memes, multimedia remixes, and jokes. As a collective ritual, irony allowed people to temporarily background the mounting feelings of bewilderment and uncertainty by foregrounding the familiar scripts of playful and grassroots expressivity typical of networked publics. While giving the country a way to breathe before grieving, irony delivered both traditional political satire and new symbolic arrangements to frame "us" versus "them": Northern Italy versus Southern Italy, Italy versus China. We advance initial reflections on irony and its functions during what we call Italy's COVID-19 buffer zone and argue for the need of more platform research interested in how users appropriate devices and vernaculars in ways that are culturally bound. In other words, can we rethink "The Platform" (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, Instagram) as a constellation of small-world-platforms-sometimes overlapping, other times segregating-each shaped by local hopes and fears, histories and events?

摘要

2020年2月22日,意大利北部的11个市镇成为欧洲首个新冠疫情“红色区域”。两天后,当病毒已在该国传播数周这一情况变得明显时,意大利进入了一个“缓冲地带”,这是一个介于正常状态和大流行之间的临时区域。缓冲地带持续了大约两周,社交媒体上充斥着通过表情包、多媒体混音和笑话传播的讽刺意味。作为一种集体仪式,讽刺使人们能够通过突出网络公众所特有的轻松有趣和草根表达的熟悉模式,暂时将日益增加的困惑和不确定感置于次要位置。在让国家在悲痛之前得以喘息的同时,讽刺既传递了传统的政治讽刺,也形成了新的象征格局来界定“我们”与“他们”:意大利北部与意大利南部、意大利与中国。我们对在我们所称的意大利新冠疫情缓冲地带期间的讽刺及其作用进行了初步思考,并主张需要开展更多关于平台的研究,关注用户如何以受文化限制的方式运用各种工具和方言。换句话说,我们能否将“平台”(如推特、脸书、照片墙)重新思考为一个由小世界平台组成的集合体——这些平台有时重叠,有时分离——每个平台都由当地的希望与恐惧、历史与事件塑造?

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bb1/7399572/785d82f0cf9b/10.1177_2056305120948254-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bb1/7399572/ff779a502bcb/10.1177_2056305120948254-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bb1/7399572/785d82f0cf9b/10.1177_2056305120948254-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bb1/7399572/ff779a502bcb/10.1177_2056305120948254-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6bb1/7399572/785d82f0cf9b/10.1177_2056305120948254-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
One Platform, a Thousand Worlds: On Twitter Irony in the Early Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.一个平台,万千世界:论意大利对新冠疫情早期反应中的推特反讽现象
Soc Media Soc. 2020 Jul 30;6(3):2056305120948254. doi: 10.1177/2056305120948254. eCollection 2020 Jul.
2
Temporal and Location Variations, and Link Categories for the Dissemination of COVID-19-Related Information on Twitter During the SARS-CoV-2 Outbreak in Europe: Infoveillance Study.欧洲SARS-CoV-2疫情期间推特上新冠疫情相关信息传播的时间和地点变化以及链接类别:信息监测研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e19629. doi: 10.2196/19629.
3
Concerns Expressed by Chinese Social Media Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis of Sina Weibo Microblogging Data.新冠疫情期间中国社交媒体用户表达的担忧:对新浪微博数据的内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 26;22(11):e22152. doi: 10.2196/22152.
4
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
5
Expectations and reality: a case study of return migration from the United States to Southern Italy.期望与现实:从美国返回意大利南部的移民案例研究
Int Migr Rev. 1974 Summer;8(26):245-62.
6
A stance data set on polarized conversations on Twitter about the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19.一个关于推特上关于羟氯喹作为治疗新冠病毒病疗效的两极分化对话的立场数据集。
Data Brief. 2020 Dec;33:106401. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106401. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Factors Engaging Users of Diabetes Social Media Channels on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram: Observational Study.社交媒体在糖尿病管理中的应用:基于 Facebook、Twitter 和 Instagram 的用户参与因素观察性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Sep 29;22(9):e21204. doi: 10.2196/21204.
8
A Systematic review of the validity of screening depression through Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat.通过 Facebook、Twitter、Instagram 和 Snapchat 筛查抑郁的有效性的系统评价
J Affect Disord. 2021 May 1;286:360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.091. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
9
Twitter Discussions and Emotions About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Machine Learning Approach.关于新冠疫情的推特讨论与情绪:机器学习方法
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 25;22(11):e20550. doi: 10.2196/20550.
10
Global Sentiments Surrounding the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Analysis of Twitter Trends.全球社交媒体推特上的新冠大流行情绪:推特趋势分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 22;6(2):e19447. doi: 10.2196/19447.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotions on Twitter as crisis imprint in high-trust societies: Do ambient affiliations affect emotional expression during the pandemic?社交媒体上的情绪:高信任社会中的危机印记:环境关联是否会影响大流行期间的情绪表达?
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 5;19(3):e0296801. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296801. eCollection 2024.
2
Exploring the vaccine conversation on TikTok in Italy: beyond classic vaccine stances.探索意大利 TikTok 上的疫苗对话:超越传统的疫苗立场。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 12;23(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15748-y.
3
Detecting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in India: a multimodal transformer based approach.
检测印度对新冠疫苗的犹豫态度:一种基于多模态变压器的方法。
J Intell Inf Syst. 2023;60(1):157-173. doi: 10.1007/s10844-022-00745-1. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
Using Humor to Promote Social Distancing on Tiktok During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在新冠疫情期间利用幽默在TikTok上促进社交距离
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 23;13:887744. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.887744. eCollection 2022.
5
[The global Corona Pandemic in the mirror of personal postings-Platform-related modes of communication in social media].[个人帖文视角下的全球新冠疫情——社交媒体中与平台相关的交流模式]
OZS Osterr Z Soziol. 2021;46(4):353-384. doi: 10.1007/s11614-021-00465-w. Epub 2021 Nov 30.