Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Pediatrics, Hospital e Maternidade Santa Isabel, Aracaju, Brazil.
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 Oct;26(10):1240-1247. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13646. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
Quantitative analysis of the implementation of the bedside paediatric early warning system (B-PEWS) in a resource-limited setting. The B-PEWS serves to pre-emptively identify hospitalised children who are at risk for cardiopulmonary arrest and subsequently to provide critical care in time.
We performed a retrospective review through the medical data records of patients after discharge from the paediatric ward of a philanthropic hospital in Brazil. Nurses' performance using the system was measured with various parameters.
A total of 499 patients were included, and a total of 8024 scores were checked. During the 21-week research period, the implementation rate increased significantly from 66.5% (SD 26.0) in Period 1 to 93.1% (SD 16.6) in Period 2. The number of scores that resulted in a correct total score went from 7.5% in Period 1 to 32.2% in Period 2, p < 0.001. There was an improvement in the correct choice of age group between the two periods (from 32.2% to 53.4%). There was no difference in the mean admission time of patients in the two periods: in the first period 4.8 days (SD 2.9) and in the second period 4.8 days (SD 4.1).
It is possible to implement a PEWS in resource-limited settings while achieving high implementation rates. However, this is a time- and energy-consuming process. Having an active and involved team that is responsible for implementation is key for a successful implementation. Factors that likely hindered implementation were a large change in workflow for the nursing staff, non-native speakers as main investigators.
定量分析资源有限环境下床边儿科预警评分系统(B-PEWS)的实施情况。B-PEWS 用于预先识别有心跳骤停风险的住院患儿,并及时提供重症护理。
我们通过巴西一家慈善医院儿科病房患者的医疗数据记录进行回顾性研究。通过各种参数来衡量护士使用该系统的表现。
共纳入 499 例患者,共检查了 8024 个评分。在 21 周的研究期间,实施率从第 1 期的 66.5%(SD 26.0)显著增加到第 2 期的 93.1%(SD 16.6)。导致正确总分的评分数量从第 1 期的 7.5%增加到第 2 期的 32.2%,p < 0.001。两个时期之间正确选择年龄组的比例有所提高(从第 1 期的 32.2%提高到第 2 期的 53.4%)。两个时期患者的平均入院时间没有差异:第 1 期为 4.8 天(SD 2.9),第 2 期为 4.8 天(SD 4.1)。
在资源有限的环境下实施 PEWS 是可行的,同时可以实现高实施率。然而,这是一个耗费时间和精力的过程。拥有一个积极参与并负责实施的团队是成功实施的关键。可能阻碍实施的因素包括护理人员工作流程的重大变化,以及非母语人士作为主要调查人员。