• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多中心验证床边儿科预警评分系统:一种用于检测住院儿童病情恶化的疾病严重程度评分。

Multicentre validation of the bedside paediatric early warning system score: a severity of illness score to detect evolving critical illness in hospitalised children.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2011 Aug 3;15(4):R184. doi: 10.1186/cc10337.

DOI:10.1186/cc10337
PMID:21812993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3387627/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The timely provision of critical care to hospitalised patients at risk for cardiopulmonary arrest is contingent upon identification and referral by frontline providers. Current approaches require improvement. In a single-centre study, we developed the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System (Bedside PEWS) score to identify patients at risk. The objective of this study was to validate the Bedside PEWS score in a large patient population at multiple hospitals.

METHODS

We performed an international, multicentre, case-control study of children admitted to hospital inpatient units with no limitations on care. Case patients had experienced a clinical deterioration event involving either an immediate call to a resuscitation team or urgent admission to a paediatric intensive care unit. Control patients had no events. The scores ranged from 0 to 26 and were assessed in the 24 hours prior to the clinical deterioration event. Score performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUCROC) curve by comparison with the retrospective rating of nurses and the temporal progression of scores in case patients.

RESULTS

A total of 2,074 patients were evaluated at 4 participating hospitals. The median (interquartile range) maximum Bedside PEWS scores for the 12 hours ending 1 hour before the clinical deterioration event were 8 (5 to 12) in case patients and 2 (1 to 4) in control patients (P < 0.0001). The AUCROC curve (95% confidence interval) was 0.87 (0.85 to 0.89). In case patients, mean scores were 5.3 at 20 to 24 hours and 8.4 at 0 to 4 hours before the event (P < 0.0001). The AUCROC curve (95% CI) of the retrospective nurse ratings was 0.83 (0.81 to 0.86). This was significantly lower than that of the Bedside PEWS score (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Bedside PEWS score identified children at risk for cardiopulmonary arrest. Scores were elevated and continued to increase in the 24 hours before the clinical deterioration event. Prospective clinical evaluation is needed to determine whether this score will improve the quality of care and patient outcomes.

摘要

介绍

及时为有发生心肺骤停风险的住院患者提供重症监护取决于一线医护人员的识别和转介。目前的方法需要改进。在一项单中心研究中,我们开发了床边儿科早期预警系统(Bedside PEWS)评分来识别有风险的患者。本研究的目的是在多家医院的大量患者群体中验证床边 PEWS 评分。

方法

我们进行了一项国际性的多中心病例对照研究,纳入了无任何医疗限制的住院病房患儿。病例组患者经历了涉及到紧急呼叫复苏团队或紧急转入儿科重症监护病房的临床恶化事件。对照组患者无此类事件。评分范围为 0 至 26 分,在临床恶化事件发生前的 24 小时内进行评估。通过与护士回顾性评分和病例组评分的时间进展比较,使用接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUCROC)评估评分表现。

结果

4 家参与医院共评估了 2074 例患者。在距临床恶化事件发生前 1 小时结束的 12 小时内,病例组最大床边 PEWS 评分中位数(四分位距)为 8(5 至 12),对照组为 2(1 至 4)(P<0.0001)。AUCROC 曲线(95%置信区间)为 0.87(0.85 至 0.89)。在病例组中,平均评分在 20 至 24 小时为 5.3,在事件发生前 0 至 4 小时为 8.4(P<0.0001)。护士回顾性评分的 AUCROC 曲线(95%CI)为 0.83(0.81 至 0.86)。这明显低于床边 PEWS 评分(P<0.0001)。

结论

床边 PEWS 评分可识别有发生心肺骤停风险的儿童。评分在临床恶化事件发生前 24 小时升高且持续升高。需要前瞻性临床评估以确定该评分是否会改善护理质量和患者结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5143/3387627/8c7068d165d8/cc10337-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5143/3387627/0b3528e01534/cc10337-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5143/3387627/9a2337d7e420/cc10337-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5143/3387627/8c7068d165d8/cc10337-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5143/3387627/0b3528e01534/cc10337-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5143/3387627/9a2337d7e420/cc10337-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5143/3387627/8c7068d165d8/cc10337-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Multicentre validation of the bedside paediatric early warning system score: a severity of illness score to detect evolving critical illness in hospitalised children.多中心验证床边儿科预警评分系统:一种用于检测住院儿童病情恶化的疾病严重程度评分。
Crit Care. 2011 Aug 3;15(4):R184. doi: 10.1186/cc10337.
2
Development and initial validation of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System score.床边儿科早期预警系统评分的制定与初步验证。
Crit Care. 2009;13(4):R135. doi: 10.1186/cc7998. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
3
A multicentre, randomised intervention study of the Paediatric Early Warning Score: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.儿童早期预警评分的多中心随机干预研究:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jun 8;18(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2011-7.
4
Validation of a pediatric early warning system for hospitalized pediatric oncology patients in a resource-limited setting.资源受限环境下住院儿科肿瘤患者儿科早期预警系统的验证
Cancer. 2017 Dec 15;123(24):4903-4913. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30951. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
5
Missed opportunities: incomplete and inaccurate recording of paediatric early warning scores.错失的机会:儿科早期预警评分记录不完整、不准确。
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Dec;104(12):1208-1213. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316248. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
6
Validation of the Cardiac Children's Hospital Early Warning Score: an early warning scoring tool to prevent cardiopulmonary arrests in children with heart disease.儿童医院心脏科早期预警评分的验证:一种预防心脏病患儿心肺骤停的早期预警评分工具。
Congenit Heart Dis. 2014 May-Jun;9(3):194-202. doi: 10.1111/chd.12132. Epub 2013 Aug 20.
7
How to implement a PEWS in a resource-limited setting: A quantitative analysis of the bedside-PEWS implementation in a hospital in northeast Brazil.如何在资源有限的情况下实施 PEWS:巴西东北部一家医院床边 PEWS 实施的定量分析。
Trop Med Int Health. 2021 Oct;26(10):1240-1247. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13646. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
8
'The Score Matters': wide variations in predictive performance of 18 paediatric track and trigger systems.“评分至关重要”:18种儿科病情追踪与触发系统的预测性能差异很大。
Arch Dis Child. 2017 Jun;102(6):487-495. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311088. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
Identifying the critically ill paediatric oncology patient: a study protocol for a prospective observational cohort study for validation of a modified Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System score in hospitalised paediatric oncology patients.识别危重症儿科肿瘤患者:一项前瞻性观察队列研究的研究方案,旨在验证改良版床边儿科预警评分系统在住院儿科肿瘤患者中的有效性。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 19;11(5):e046360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046360.
10
Validation of the Children's Hospital Early Warning System for Critical Deterioration Recognition.儿童医院危重症恶化识别早期预警系统的验证
J Pediatr Nurs. 2017 Jan-Feb;32:52-58. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the performance of paediatric early warning scores to predict critical deterioration events in hospitalised children (the DETECT study): a retrospective matched case-control study.评估儿科早期预警评分预测住院儿童严重病情恶化事件的性能(DETECT研究):一项回顾性匹配病例对照研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05754-x.
2
Machine Learning for Predicting Critical Events Among Hospitalized Children.用于预测住院儿童危急事件的机器学习
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2513149. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13149.
3
Machine Learning-Based Pediatric Early Warning Score: Patient Outcomes in a Pre- Versus Post-Implementation Study, 2019-2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensitivity of the pediatric early warning score to identify patient deterioration.儿科预警评分对识别患者病情恶化的敏感性。
Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):e763-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0338. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
2
Development and initial validation of the Bedside Paediatric Early Warning System score.床边儿科早期预警系统评分的制定与初步验证。
Crit Care. 2009;13(4):R135. doi: 10.1186/cc7998. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
3
Prospective evaluation of a pediatric inpatient early warning scoring system.儿科住院患者早期预警评分系统的前瞻性评估
基于机器学习的儿科早期预警评分:2019 - 2023年实施前与实施后研究中的患者结局
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 Feb 1;26(2):e146-e154. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003656. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
4
Interoperable Models for Identifying Critically Ill Children at Risk of Neurologic Morbidity.用于识别有神经疾病风险的危重症儿童的可互操作模型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2457469. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57469.
5
Safe, effective and cost-effective oxygen saturation targets for children and adolescents with respiratory distress: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (OxyKids study).针对有呼吸窘迫的儿童和青少年的安全、有效且具成本效益的血氧饱和度目标:一项随机对照试验的方案(OxyKids研究)
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 22;14(12):e087891. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087891.
6
Relationship between Time of Day of Medical Emergency Team Activations and Outcomes of Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.医疗急救团队启动时间与住院儿科患者结局之间的关系。
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2022 Mar 8;13(4):379-388. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744297. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Implementation of a critical care outreach team in a children's hospital.在一家儿童医院实施重症监护外展团队。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Apr 11;18:100626. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100626. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Predicting transfers to intensive care in children using CEWT and other early warning systems.使用儿童早期预警工具(CEWT)和其他早期预警系统预测儿童转入重症监护病房的情况。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Dec 30;17:100540. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100540. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Association between mortality and critical events within 48 hours of transfer to the pediatric intensive care unit.转入儿科重症监护病房后48小时内死亡率与危急事件之间的关联。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Dec 21;11:1284672. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1284672. eCollection 2023.
10
Development and Temporal Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Clinical Deterioration.机器学习模型预测临床恶化的开发和时间验证。
Hosp Pediatr. 2024 Jan 1;14(1):11-20. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007308.
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2009 Apr;14(2):79-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2008.00178.x.
4
Reduction of hospital mortality and of preventable cardiac arrest and death on introduction of a pediatric medical emergency team.引入儿科医疗急救团队后降低了医院死亡率以及可预防的心脏骤停和死亡情况。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 May;10(3):306-12. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318198b02c.
5
The impact of introducing medical emergency team system on the documentations of vital signs.引入医疗急救团队系统对生命体征记录的影响。
Resuscitation. 2009 Jan;80(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
6
Prospective cohort study to test the predictability of the Cardiff and Vale paediatric early warning system.一项前瞻性队列研究,旨在测试加的夫和韦尔儿科早期预警系统的可预测性。
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Aug;94(8):602-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.142026. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
7
A review, and performance evaluation, of single-parameter "track and trigger" systems.单参数“跟踪与触发”系统的综述及性能评估。
Resuscitation. 2008 Oct;79(1):11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.05.004. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
8
Do outcomes vary according to the source of admission to the pediatric intensive care unit?儿科重症监护病房的收治来源不同,治疗结果会有所差异吗?
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;9(1):20-5. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000298642.11872.29.
9
Transition from a traditional code team to a medical emergency team and categorization of cardiopulmonary arrests in a children's center.从传统的代码团队过渡到医疗急救团队以及儿童中心心肺骤停的分类。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008 Feb;162(2):117-22. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2007.33.
10
Review and performance evaluation of aggregate weighted 'track and trigger' systems.聚合加权“跟踪与触发”系统的综述与性能评估
Resuscitation. 2008 May;77(2):170-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.12.004. Epub 2008 Feb 4.