Suppr超能文献

迈向人权和循证法律框架的(自我管理)堕胎:对过去十年法律改革的回顾。

Toward Human Rights and Evidence-Based Legal Frameworks for (Self-Managed) Abortion: A Review of the Last Decade of Legal Reform.

机构信息

Associate at the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Visiting Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law, formerly Ipas, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2021 Jun;23(1):199-212.

Abstract

Since the late 1980s, people have safely self-managed their abortions with medication, changing the landscape of abortion. This practice continues to evolve and expand and has been identified as a cause of decline in severe abortion-related morbidity and mortality. However, developments in medical abortion and self-management have yet to be reflected in the way abortion is regulated. Building on the need for evidence and human rights-based laws, this article explores developments in abortion laws from around the world between 2010 and 2020 to explore the extent to which they have contributed to an enabling environment for self-managed abortion. We focus on recent laws-those adopted in the past 10 years-for which we had access to information for analysis. We observe that laws in force still retain clinical settings and the involvement of medical professionals as the desirable circumstances for an abortion to take place and that even those that have liberalized access still retain some degree of criminalization for the pregnant person who carries out a self-managed abortion or for those who support the process. We conclude that there is enough evidence and support from international human rights standards to ground legal developments that enable self-managed abortion.

摘要

自 20 世纪 80 年代末以来,人们已经安全地自行使用药物来终止妊娠,从而改变了堕胎的格局。这种做法仍在不断发展和扩大,并被认为是导致严重堕胎相关发病率和死亡率下降的原因之一。然而,药物流产和自我管理方面的发展尚未反映在堕胎的监管方式中。本文基于对证据和基于人权的法律的需求,探讨了 2010 年至 2020 年期间全球堕胎法的发展情况,以探讨其在多大程度上为自我管理堕胎创造了有利环境。我们重点关注最近的法律——即在过去 10 年中通过的法律,我们可以获取这些法律的相关信息进行分析。我们观察到,现行法律仍然保留了医疗机构和医疗专业人员作为堕胎发生的理想环境,即使那些放宽了堕胎限制的法律,对于自行堕胎的孕妇或支持这一过程的人,仍然保留了一定程度的刑事定罪。我们的结论是,有足够的证据和国际人权标准的支持,可以为允许自我管理堕胎的法律发展提供依据。

相似文献

4
Self-managed abortion: Aligning law and policy with medical evidence.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Feb;160(2):720-725. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14607. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
6
Policy surveillance for a global analysis of national abortion laws.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2064208. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2064208.
7
Developments in laws on induced abortion: 1998-2007.
Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2008 Sep;34(3):110-20. doi: 10.1363/ifpp.34.110.08.
8
Self-managed abortion.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;31(6):435-440. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000585.
9
State obligations to implement African abortion laws: employing human rights in a changing legal landscape.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012 Nov;119(2):198-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
10
Abortion in Europe, 1920-91: a public health perspective.
Stud Fam Plann. 1992 Jan-Feb;23(1):1-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility of medication abortion self-care service delivery in Ghana.
Reprod Health. 2025 May 2;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02021-1.
2
[Women's rescuers network: Community support for self-managed abortion in Argentina].
Salud Colect. 2024 Jun 20;20:e4810. doi: 10.18294/sc.2024.4810.
6
Policy surveillance for a global analysis of national abortion laws.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2064208. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2064208.
7
Self-managed abortion: Exploring synergies between institutional medical systems and autonomous health movements.
Contraception. 2021 Sep;104(3):219-221. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.06.006. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-managed abortion: a constellation of actors, a cacophony of laws?
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021 Dec;29(1):1899764. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1899764.
2
COVID-19 has "devastating" effect on women and girls.
Lancet. 2020 Aug 1;396(10247):301-302. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31679-2.
3
Why self-managed abortion is so much more than a provisional solution for times of pandemic.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1779633. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1779633.
6
Abortion in the context of COVID-19: a human rights imperative.
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2020 Dec;28(1):1758394. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1758394.
7
Abortion during the Covid-19 Pandemic - Ensuring Access to an Essential Health Service.
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 7;382(19):e47. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2008006. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
8
Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 9;3(3):CD013181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013181.pub2.
9
The legal determinants of health: harnessing the power of law for global health and sustainable development.
Lancet. 2019 May 4;393(10183):1857-1910. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30233-8. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review.
BJOG. 2019 Aug;126(9):1094-1102. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15684. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验