Associate at the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Visiting Professor of Law at Temple University Beasley School of Law, formerly Ipas, Philadelphia, USA.
Health Hum Rights. 2021 Jun;23(1):199-212.
Since the late 1980s, people have safely self-managed their abortions with medication, changing the landscape of abortion. This practice continues to evolve and expand and has been identified as a cause of decline in severe abortion-related morbidity and mortality. However, developments in medical abortion and self-management have yet to be reflected in the way abortion is regulated. Building on the need for evidence and human rights-based laws, this article explores developments in abortion laws from around the world between 2010 and 2020 to explore the extent to which they have contributed to an enabling environment for self-managed abortion. We focus on recent laws-those adopted in the past 10 years-for which we had access to information for analysis. We observe that laws in force still retain clinical settings and the involvement of medical professionals as the desirable circumstances for an abortion to take place and that even those that have liberalized access still retain some degree of criminalization for the pregnant person who carries out a self-managed abortion or for those who support the process. We conclude that there is enough evidence and support from international human rights standards to ground legal developments that enable self-managed abortion.
自 20 世纪 80 年代末以来,人们已经安全地自行使用药物来终止妊娠,从而改变了堕胎的格局。这种做法仍在不断发展和扩大,并被认为是导致严重堕胎相关发病率和死亡率下降的原因之一。然而,药物流产和自我管理方面的发展尚未反映在堕胎的监管方式中。本文基于对证据和基于人权的法律的需求,探讨了 2010 年至 2020 年期间全球堕胎法的发展情况,以探讨其在多大程度上为自我管理堕胎创造了有利环境。我们重点关注最近的法律——即在过去 10 年中通过的法律,我们可以获取这些法律的相关信息进行分析。我们观察到,现行法律仍然保留了医疗机构和医疗专业人员作为堕胎发生的理想环境,即使那些放宽了堕胎限制的法律,对于自行堕胎的孕妇或支持这一过程的人,仍然保留了一定程度的刑事定罪。我们的结论是,有足够的证据和国际人权标准的支持,可以为允许自我管理堕胎的法律发展提供依据。