Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology, and Immunology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021 Jul 1;23(7):53. doi: 10.1007/s11926-021-01018-6.
This article presents a comprehensive narrative review of reactive arthritis (ReA) with focus on articles published between 2018 and 2020. We discuss the entire spectrum of microbial agents known to be the main causative agents of ReA, those reported to be rare infective agents, and those reported to be new candidates causing the disease. The discussion is set within the context of changing disease terminology, definition, and classification over time. Further, we include reports that present at least a hint of effective antimicrobial therapy for ReA as documented in case reports or in double-blind controlled studies. Additional information is included on microbial products detected in the joint, as well as on the positivity of HLA-B27.
Recent reports of ReA cover several rare causative microorganism such as Neisseria meningitides, Clostridium difficile, Escherichia coli, Hafnia alvei, Blastocytosis, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium, Cyclospora cayetanensis, Entamoeba histolytica/dispar, Strongyloides stercoralis, β-haemolytic Streptococci, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin, and Rickettsia rickettsii. The most prominent new infectious agents implicated as causative in ReA are Staphylococcus lugdunensis, placenta- and umbilical cord-derived Wharton's jelly, Rothia mucilaginosa, and most importantly the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In view of the increasingly large spectrum of causative agents, diagnostic consideration for the disease must include the entire panel of post-infectious arthritides termed ReA. Diagnostic procedures cannot be restricted to the well-known HLA-B27-associated group of ReA, but must also cover the large number of rare forms of arthritis following infections and vaccinations, as well as those elicited by the newly identified members of the ReA group summarized herein. Inclusion of these newly identified etiologic agents must necessitate increased research into the pathogenic mechanisms variously involved, which will engender important insights for treatment and management of ReA.
本文对反应性关节炎(ReA)进行了全面的叙述性综述,重点关注 2018 年至 2020 年期间发表的文章。我们讨论了已知的所有主要致 ReA 的微生物制剂,罕见的感染性病原体,以及新的候选病原体。讨论的背景是随着时间的推移疾病术语、定义和分类的变化。此外,我们还包括了至少有一些提示性的有效抗菌治疗 ReA 的报告,这些报告记录在病例报告或双盲对照研究中。还包括了在关节中检测到的微生物产物,以及 HLA-B27 的阳性率的信息。
最近报道的 ReA 涵盖了几种罕见的病原体,如脑膜炎奈瑟菌、艰难梭菌、大肠杆菌、海氏肠杆菌、 Blastocytosis、蓝氏贾第鞭毛虫、隐孢子虫、环孢子虫、溶组织内阿米巴/迪斯帕拉、粪类圆线虫、β-溶血性链球菌、结核分枝杆菌、肺炎支原体、牛型结核分枝杆菌卡介苗、立克次体。最引人注目的新的感染性病原体是路邓葡萄球菌、胎盘和脐带衍生的 Wharton 胶、粘质沙雷氏菌,最重要的是 SARS-CoV-2 病毒。鉴于致病因素的范围越来越大,对该病的诊断必须包括称为 ReA 的整个传染性关节炎组。诊断程序不能仅限于众所周知的 HLA-B27 相关的 ReA 组,还必须涵盖感染和接种疫苗后大量罕见的关节炎形式,以及本文总结的 ReA 组中最近发现的成员引起的关节炎。包括这些新发现的病原体必须增加对各种致病机制的研究,这将为 ReA 的治疗和管理提供重要的见解。