抗菌光动力疗法治疗牙周炎的有效性:一项关于人体随机对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vivo Human Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.
作者信息
Dalvi Snehal, Benedicenti Stefano, Sălăgean Tudor, Bordea Ioana Roxana, Hanna Reem
机构信息
Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, Laser Therapy Centre, University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Department of Periodontology, Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur 441110, India.
出版信息
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jun 4;13(6):836. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060836.
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) efficacy in periodontitis. The review protocol was conducted in accordance with PRISMA statements, Cochrane Collaboration recommendations and is registered in PROSPERO (CRD 42020161516). Electronic and hand search strategies were undertaken to gather data on in vivo human RCTs followed by qualitative analysis. Differences in probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals and pooled in random effects model at three and six months. Heterogeneity was analyzed, using Q and I tests. Publication bias was assessed by visual examination of the funnel plot symmetry. Sixty percent of 31 eligible studies showed a high risk of bias. Meta-analysis on 18 studies showed no additional benefit in split mouth studies in terms of PPD reduction (SMD 0.166; 95% CI -0.278 to 0.611; = 0.463) and CAL gain (SMD 0.092; 95% CI -0.013 to 0.198; = 0.088). Similar findings noted for parallel group studies; PPD reduction (SMD 0.076; 95% CI -0.420 to 0.573; = 0.763) and CAL gain (SMD 0.056; 95% CI -0.408 to 0.552; = 0.745). Sensitivity analysis minimized heterogeneity for both outcome variables; however, intergroup differences were not statistically significant. Future research should aim for well-designed RCTs in order to determine the effectiveness of aPDT.
本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了抗菌光动力疗法(aPDT)在牙周炎治疗中的疗效。该评价方案是根据PRISMA声明、Cochrane协作网建议进行的,并已在PROSPERO(CRD 42020161516)注册。采用电子和手工检索策略收集关于人体体内随机对照试验的数据,随后进行定性分析。计算探诊深度(PPD)和临床附着水平(CAL)的差异,并给出95%置信区间,在3个月和6个月时采用随机效应模型进行汇总。使用Q检验和I检验分析异质性。通过直观检查漏斗图的对称性评估发表偏倚。31项符合条件的研究中有60%显示出高偏倚风险。对18项研究的荟萃分析表明,在分口研究中,就PPD降低(标准化均值差[SMD]0.166;95%置信区间-0.278至0.611;P = 0.463)和CAL增加(SMD 0.092;95%置信区间-0.013至0.198;P = 0.088)而言,没有额外益处。平行组研究也有类似结果;PPD降低(SMD 0.076;95%置信区间-0.420至0.573;P = 0.763)和CAL增加(SMD 0.056;95%置信区间-0.408至0.552;P = 0.745)。敏感性分析使两个结局变量的异质性最小化;然而,组间差异无统计学意义。未来的研究应以设计良好的随机对照试验为目标,以确定aPDT的有效性。