• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母乳喂养在 Twitter 世界的交流策略、挑战和机遇:意见领袖的观点和社交网络分析。

Breastfeeding Communication Strategies, Challenges and Opportunities in the Twitter-Verse: Perspectives of Influencers and Social Network Analysis.

机构信息

Larsson-Rosenquist Foundation Mother-Milk-Infant Center of Research Excellence, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92161, USA.

Department of Education Studies, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92161, USA.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 8;18(12):6181. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126181.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18126181
PMID:34201000
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8230232/
Abstract

Using social media is one important strategy to communicate research and public health guidelines to the scientific community and general public. Empirical evidence about which communication strategies are effective around breastfeeding messaging is scarce. To fill this gap, we aimed to identify influencers in the largest available Twitter database using social network analysis ( = 10,694 users), inductively analyze tweets, and explore communication strategies, motivations, and challenges via semi-structured interviews. Influencers had diverse backgrounds within and beyond the scientific health community (SHC; 42.7%): 54.7% were from the general public and 3% were companies. SHC contributed to most of the tweets ( = 798 tweets), disseminating guidelines and research findings more frequently than others ( < 0.001). Influencers from the general community mostly tweeted opinions regarding the current state of breastfeeding research and advocacy. Interviewees provided practical strategies (e.g., preferred visuals, tone, and writing style) to achieve personal and societal goals including career opportunities, community support, and improved breastfeeding practices. Complex challenges that need to be addressed were identified. Ideological differences regarding infant feeding may be hampering constructive communication, including differences in influencers' interpretation of the WHO International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes and in perspectives regarding which social media interactions encompass conflict of interest.

摘要

利用社交媒体向科学界和公众传播研究和公共卫生指南是一项重要策略。关于母乳喂养信息传播的哪些沟通策略有效,实证证据很少。为了填补这一空白,我们旨在使用社会网络分析(= 10694 名用户)在最大的可用 Twitter 数据库中确定有影响力的人,对推文进行归纳分析,并通过半结构化访谈探索沟通策略、动机和挑战。有影响力的人在科学卫生界(SHC)内外有着不同的背景(= 10694 名用户):54.7%来自普通公众,3%来自公司。SHC 对大多数推文做出了贡献(= 798 条推文),比其他群体更频繁地传播准则和研究结果(<0.001)。来自普通社区的 SHC 主要发布关于母乳喂养研究和倡导现状的意见。受访者提供了实现个人和社会目标的实用策略(例如,首选的视觉效果、语气和写作风格),包括职业机会、社区支持和改善母乳喂养实践。还确定了需要解决的复杂挑战。关于婴儿喂养的意识形态差异可能会阻碍建设性的沟通,包括影响者对世界卫生组织《国际母乳代用品销售守则》的解释差异,以及对哪些社交媒体互动包含利益冲突的看法差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/988b/8230232/408f38e65a67/ijerph-18-06181-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/988b/8230232/cf71b81a52d8/ijerph-18-06181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/988b/8230232/2d5cf83b8c37/ijerph-18-06181-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/988b/8230232/d73ff920aa7f/ijerph-18-06181-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/988b/8230232/408f38e65a67/ijerph-18-06181-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/988b/8230232/cf71b81a52d8/ijerph-18-06181-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/988b/8230232/2d5cf83b8c37/ijerph-18-06181-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/988b/8230232/d73ff920aa7f/ijerph-18-06181-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/988b/8230232/408f38e65a67/ijerph-18-06181-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Breastfeeding Communication Strategies, Challenges and Opportunities in the Twitter-Verse: Perspectives of Influencers and Social Network Analysis.母乳喂养在 Twitter 世界的交流策略、挑战和机遇:意见领袖的观点和社交网络分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 8;18(12):6181. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126181.
2
Breastfeeding promotion on Twitter: A social network and content analysis approach.推特上的母乳喂养推广:一种社交网络与内容分析方法。
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Oct;16(4):e13053. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13053. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
3
Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter.通过社交网络传播科学:以 Twitter 上的母乳喂养传播为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237471. eCollection 2020.
4
Real-time Twitter interactions during World Breastfeeding Week: A case study and social network analysis.世界母乳喂养周期间的实时 Twitter 互动:案例研究和社交网络分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 29;16(3):e0249302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249302. eCollection 2021.
5
Twitter use in scientific communication revealed by visualization of information spreading by influencers within half a year after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.福岛第一核电站事故半年后,通过对有影响力者传播信息的可视化,揭示了推特在科学传播中的应用。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 7;13(9):e0203594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203594. eCollection 2018.
6
Activity, content, contributors, and influencers of the twitter discussion on urologic oncology.关于泌尿肿瘤学的推特讨论的活跃度、内容、参与者及影响因素。
Urol Oncol. 2016 Sep;34(9):377-83. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.02.021. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
7
Patient Participation at Health Care Conferences: Engaged Patients Increase Information Flow, Expand Propagation, and Deepen Engagement in the Conversation of Tweets Compared to Physicians or Researchers.患者在医疗保健会议中的参与度:与医生或研究人员相比,积极参与的患者能增加信息流通、扩大传播范围并加深在推文对话中的参与度。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 17;19(8):e280. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8049.
8
The infant feeding methods promoted by South African Instagram influencers in relation to crying and sleeping, 2018-2020: a retrospective digital ethnography.南非 Instagram 影响者在婴儿哭泣和睡眠方面所推广的喂养方法,2018-2020 年:一项回顾性数字民族志研究。
Int Breastfeed J. 2023 Mar 16;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13006-023-00555-3.
9
COVID-19 and the 5G Conspiracy Theory: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Data.新冠疫情与5G阴谋论:基于推特数据的社交网络分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 6;22(5):e19458. doi: 10.2196/19458.
10
What Do Social Media Influencers Say about Health? A Theory-Driven Content Analysis of Top Ten Health Influencers' Posts on Sina Weibo.社交媒体影响者对健康的看法如何?对新浪微博十大健康影响者帖子的理论驱动内容分析。
J Health Commun. 2021 Jan 2;26(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1865486. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A longitudinal analysis of usage patterns, topics, and information dissemination related to five names for cultured meat on social media.对社交媒体上与培养肉五个名称相关的使用模式、主题和信息传播的纵向分析。
Curr Res Food Sci. 2024 Sep 16;9:100859. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2024.100859. eCollection 2024.
2
Content Analysis of Austrian Print and Online Newspaper Coverage of Breastfeeding Over Two Decades.奥地利二十多年来印刷和在线报纸对母乳喂养报道的内容分析
Matern Child Nutr. 2025 Apr;21(2):e13795. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13795. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
3
Deciphering Influence on Social Media: A Comparative Analysis of Influential Account Detection Metrics in the Context of Tobacco Promotion.

本文引用的文献

1
Real-time Twitter interactions during World Breastfeeding Week: A case study and social network analysis.世界母乳喂养周期间的实时 Twitter 互动:案例研究和社交网络分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 29;16(3):e0249302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249302. eCollection 2021.
2
Public Health Messaging in an Era of Social Media.社交媒体时代的公共卫生信息传播
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):223-224. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.24514.
3
Breastfeeding and the origins of health: Interdisciplinary perspectives and priorities.母乳喂养与健康起源:跨学科视角与优先事项
解读社交媒体上的影响力:烟草促销背景下有影响力账户检测指标的比较分析
Soc Media Soc. 2024 Jan;10(1). doi: 10.1177/20563051231224268. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
4
The breastfeeding experience of women with multiple pregnancies: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.多胎妊娠妇女的母乳喂养体验:定性研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06697-4.
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Apr;17(2):e13109. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13109. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
4
Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter.通过社交网络传播科学:以 Twitter 上的母乳喂养传播为例。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237471. eCollection 2020.
5
Breastfeeding promotion on Twitter: A social network and content analysis approach.推特上的母乳喂养推广:一种社交网络与内容分析方法。
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Oct;16(4):e13053. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13053. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
6
Distance, diffusion and the role of social media in a time of COVID contagion.距离、传播扩散以及社交媒体在新冠疫情期间所起的作用。
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Oct;16(4):e13025. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13025. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
7
A qualitative examination of barriers against effective medical education and practices related to breastfeeding promotion and support in Lebanon.黎巴嫩促进和支持母乳喂养的医学教育和实践障碍的定性研究。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1723950. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1723950.
8
Breastfeed4Ghana: Design and evaluation of an innovative social media campaign.母乳喂养加纳:创新社交媒体运动的设计与评估。
Matern Child Nutr. 2020 Apr;16(2):e12909. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12909. Epub 2019 Dec 22.
9
Tobacco Use Behaviors, Attitudes, and Demographic Characteristics of Tobacco Opinion Leaders and Their Followers: Twitter Analysis.烟草意见领袖及其追随者的烟草使用行为、态度和人口统计学特征:推特分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 4;21(6):e12676. doi: 10.2196/12676.
10
Knowledge translation in health: how implementation science could contribute more.健康知识转化:实施科学如何做出更多贡献
BMC Med. 2019 May 7;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1322-9.