Dos Santos Sousa Guilherme, Guimarães Gabriel Felipe, Marcelino Edilmar, Rodokas José Eduardo Petit, de Oliveira Júnior Arilson José, Cesarino Ivana, Leão Alcides Lopes, Dos Santos Riccardi Carla, Arjmand Mohammad, Simões Rafael Plana
Medical School, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Avenue Prof. Mário Rubens Guimarães Montenegro, s/n, Botucatu 18618-687, Brazil.
Department of Bioprocess and Biotechnology, School of Agriculture, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Street José Barbosa de Barros, 1780, Botucatu 18610-034, Brazil.
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Jun 23;13(13):2065. doi: 10.3390/polym13132065.
The literature has shown that there is no consensus regarding the best resin composite photoactivation protocol. This study evaluated the efficiency of the conventional, soft-start, pulse-delay and exponential protocols for photoactivation of resin composites in reducing the shrinkage stress and temperature variation during the photopolymerisation. The photoactivation processes were performed using a photocuring unit and a smartphone app developed to control the irradiance according each photoactivation protocol. These photoactivation methods were evaluated applying photoactivation energies recommended by the resins manufactures. Three brands of resin composites were analysed: Z-250, Charisma and Ultrafill. The cure effectiveness was evaluated through depth of cure experiments. All results were statistically evaluated using one-way and multi-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). The use of exponential and pulse-delay methods resulted in a significant reduction of the shrinkage stress for all evaluated resins; however, the pulse-delay method required too long a photoactivation time. The increases on the temperature were lower when the exponential photoactivation was applied; however, the temperature variation for all photoactivation protocols was not enough to cause damage in the restoration area. The evaluation of the depth of cure showed that all photoactivation protocols resulted in cured resins with equivalent hardness, indicating that the choice of an alternative photoactivation protocol did not harm the polymerisation. In this way, the results showed the exponential protocol as the best photoactivation technique for practical applications.
文献表明,关于最佳的树脂复合材料光固化方案尚无共识。本研究评估了传统、软启动、脉冲延迟和指数方案对树脂复合材料进行光固化,以降低光聚合过程中的收缩应力和温度变化的效率。光固化过程使用光固化设备和一款为根据每种光固化方案控制辐照度而开发的智能手机应用程序来进行。这些光固化方法按照树脂制造商推荐的光固化能量进行评估。分析了三个品牌的树脂复合材料:Z - 250、魅力(Charisma)和超填(Ultrafill)。通过固化深度实验评估固化效果。所有结果均使用单因素和多因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计学评估。指数法和脉冲延迟法的使用使所有评估树脂的收缩应力显著降低;然而,脉冲延迟法所需的光固化时间过长。应用指数光固化时温度升高较低;然而,所有光固化方案的温度变化都不足以对修复区域造成损害。固化深度评估表明,所有光固化方案都能使树脂达到同等硬度,这表明选择替代光固化方案不会损害聚合反应。这样一来,结果表明指数方案是实际应用中最佳的光固化技术。