《哥本哈根倦怠量表在塞尔维亚学前教师倦怠评估中的有效性和可靠性》。

The Validity and Reliability of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory for Examination of Burnout among Preschool Teachers in Serbia.

机构信息

Department of Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Pasterova 2, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Social Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica 15, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 24;18(13):6805. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18136805.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18136805

PMID:34202911

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8297089/

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Burnout syndrome is being increasingly recognized as a factor that affects the health status and is being examined among different professional groups. Consequently, there is a need for a reliable and valid instrument for its examination. Teachers are emerging as a professional group of interest in the area of burnout research, so the aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Serbian version of Copenhagen burnout inventory among teachers at preschool institutions in Serbia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This research was conducted as a cross-sectional study between October 2018 and April 2019 on a nationally representative sample of preschool teachers in Serbia. The internal consistency of the scale was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and the construct validity was examined using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA).

RESULTS

The average score on total burnout was 39.1 ± 17.0, while the average score per scales on the Copenhagen burnout inventory was: 41.3 ± 18.7 for personal burnout, 41.2 ± 15.9 for work-related burnout, and 34.7 ± 22.0 for client-related burnout. The Cronbach's alpha for the entire scale was 0.936, the Cronbach's alpha for the personal burnout scale was 0.906, and the Cronbach's alpha for the work-related burnout scale was 0.765, while the Cronbach's alpha for the client-related burnout scale was 0.901. The EFA for the CBI showed three factors. The factor loadings varied from 0.575 to 0.859. The three factors explained 67.17% of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the three-factor Serbian version of the Copenhagen burnout inventory can be used for the assessment of burnout syndrome among teachers.

摘要

简介

倦怠综合征正日益被视为影响健康状况的一个因素，并在不同的专业群体中进行检查。因此，需要一种可靠和有效的工具来进行检查。教师作为倦怠研究领域的一个关注群体正在出现，因此本研究的目的是评估塞族版哥本哈根倦怠量表在塞尔维亚学前机构教师中的有效性和信度。

材料和方法

本研究是 2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 4 月在塞尔维亚全国代表性的学前教师样本中进行的横断面研究。使用 Cronbach's alpha 评估量表的内部一致性，使用探索性（EFA）和验证性因子分析（CFA）评估结构有效性。

结果

总倦怠平均得分为 39.1 ± 17.0，哥本哈根倦怠量表各量表的平均得分为：个人倦怠 41.3 ± 18.7，与工作相关的倦怠 41.2 ± 15.9，与客户相关的倦怠 34.7 ± 22.0。整个量表的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.936，个人倦怠量表的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.906，与工作相关的倦怠量表的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.765，而与客户相关的倦怠量表的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.901。CBI 的 EFA 显示了三个因素。因子负荷从 0.575 到 0.859 不等。这三个因素解释了 67.17%的方差。