Nahar Akhikun, Baker Anthony L, Nichols David S, Bowman John P, Britz Margaret L
Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.
Central Science Laboratory, Division of Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.
Microorganisms. 2021 Jun 9;9(6):1253. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9061253.
Bacteria containing mycolic acids in their cell envelope are often recalcitrant to cell lysis, so extracting DNA of sufficient quality for third-generation sequencing and high-fidelity genome assembly requires optimization, even when using commercial kits with protocols for hard-to-lyse bacteria. We benchmarked three spin-column-based kits against a classical DNA extraction method employing lysozyme, proteinase K and SDS for six lysozyme-resistant, sub-Antarctic strains of . Prior cultivation in broths containing glycine at highly growth-inhibitory concentrations (4.0-4.5%) improved cell lysis using both classical and kit methods. The classical method produced DNA with average fragment sizes of 27-59 Kbp and tight fragment size ranges, meeting quality standards for genome sequencing, assembly and phylogenomic analyses. By 16S rRNA gene sequencing, we classified two strains as and four strains as species. Pairwise comparison of average nucleotide identity (ANI) and alignment fraction (AF), plus genome clustering analysis, confirmed sp. 1163 and 1168 and sp. 1135 and 1138 as novel species. Phylogenetic, lipidomic and biochemical analyses classified psychrotrophic strains 1139 and 1159 as and , respectively, using ANI similarity of >98% and AF >60% for species delineation. On this basis, some members of the genome cluster groups, including strains currently named as , , and , would be reclassified either as or .
细胞包膜中含有分枝菌酸的细菌通常难以被细胞裂解,因此,即使使用针对难裂解细菌的商业试剂盒,要提取出足够质量的DNA用于第三代测序和高保真基因组组装也需要进行优化。我们将三种基于离心柱的试剂盒与一种使用溶菌酶、蛋白酶K和十二烷基硫酸钠的经典DNA提取方法进行了对比,用于处理六种耐溶菌酶的亚南极菌株。在含有高生长抑制浓度(4.0 - 4.5%)甘氨酸的肉汤中预先培养,可提高经典方法和试剂盒方法的细胞裂解效果。经典方法产生的DNA平均片段大小为27 - 59 Kbp,片段大小范围紧密,符合基因组测序、组装和系统发育基因组分析的质量标准。通过16S rRNA基因测序,我们将两种菌株分类为 ,四种菌株分类为 物种。平均核苷酸同一性(ANI)和比对分数(AF)的成对比较以及基因组聚类分析,证实了 sp. 1163和1168以及 sp. 1135和1138为新物种。系统发育、脂质组学和生化分析分别将嗜冷菌株1139和1159分类为 和 ,使用ANI相似度>98%和AF >60%进行物种划分。在此基础上, 基因组聚类组的一些成员,包括目前命名为 、 、 和 的菌株,将被重新分类为 或 。