Su Hui, Krause Amanda J, Masihi Melina, Prescott Jacqueline, Decorrevont Alex, Germond Emma, Karasik Dave, Kou Wenjun, Pandolfino John E, Carlson Dustin A
Department of Gastroenterology, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Jul 30;27(3):354-362. doi: 10.5056/jnm20118.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Incorporation of complementary and provocative test swallows to the high-resolution manometry (HRM) protocol offers potential to address limitations posed by HRM protocols that involve only a single swallow type. The aim of this study is to describe normal findings of a comprehensive HRM testing protocol performed on healthy asymptomatic volunteers.
Thirty healthy asymptomatic volunteers completed HRM with 5-mL liquid swallows in the supine position. They also completed 5-mL liquid swallows in the upright position, viscous swallows, solid test swallows, multiple rapid swallows, and a rapid drink challenge. HRM studies were analyzed via Chicago classification version 3.0.
The median (5th-95th percentiles) for integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on supine swallows was 11 (4-16) mmHg; IRP was lower than supine on upright liquid 9 (0-17) mmHg, viscous 6 (0-15) mmHg, solid 9 (1-19) mmHg, multiple rapid swallows 3 (0-12) mmHg, and rapid drink challenge 5 (-3-12) mmHg; < 0.005. While an "elevated" IRP value was observed on 1 to 2 test maneuvers in 8/30 (27%) subjects, all 30 subjects had an IRP value < 12 mmHg on at least one of the test maneuvers.
Normal values and findings from a comprehensive HRM testing protocol are reported based on evaluation of 30 healthy asymptomatic volunteers. Isolated "abnormalities" of IRP and contractile parameters were observed in the majority (80%) of these asymptomatic subjects, while all subjects also had normal features observed. Thus, the definition of "normal" should be recalibrated to focus on the entirety of the study and not individual metrics.
背景/目的:在高分辨率测压(HRM)方案中加入补充性和激发性吞咽测试,有可能解决仅涉及单一吞咽类型的HRM方案所带来的局限性。本研究的目的是描述对健康无症状志愿者进行的全面HRM测试方案的正常结果。
30名健康无症状志愿者在仰卧位完成了5毫升液体吞咽的HRM测试。他们还在直立位完成了5毫升液体吞咽、黏稠液体吞咽、固体测试吞咽、多次快速吞咽以及快速饮水挑战。HRM研究通过芝加哥分类第3.0版进行分析。
仰卧位吞咽时综合松弛压(IRP)的中位数(第5-95百分位数)为11(4-16)mmHg;直立位液体吞咽时IRP低于仰卧位,为9(0-17)mmHg,黏稠液体吞咽时为6(0-15)mmHg,固体吞咽时为9(1-19)mmHg,多次快速吞咽时为3(0-12)mmHg,快速饮水挑战时为5(-3-12)mmHg;P<0.005。虽然在8/30(27%)的受试者中,有1至2项测试动作观察到“升高”的IRP值,但所有30名受试者在至少一项测试动作中IRP值均<12 mmHg。
基于对30名健康无症状志愿者的评估,报告了全面HRM测试方案的正常值和结果。在这些无症状受试者中,大多数(80%)观察到IRP和收缩参数的孤立“异常”,同时所有受试者也观察到正常特征。因此,“正常”的定义应重新校准,以关注整个研究而非个别指标。