Univ. Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019 - UMR 8204 - CIIL - Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille, Lille, France.
Front Immunol. 2021 Jun 15;12:701285. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.701285. eCollection 2021.
Current vaccination strategies against pertussis are sub-optimal. Optimal protection against , the causative agent of pertussis, likely requires mucosal immunity. Current pertussis vaccines consist of inactivated whole cells or purified antigens thereof, combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. Although they are highly protective against severe pertussis disease, they fail to elicit mucosal immunity. Compared to natural infection, immune responses following immunization are short-lived and fail to prevent bacterial colonization of the upper respiratory tract. To overcome these shortcomings, efforts have been made for decades, and continue to be made, toward the development of mucosal vaccines against pertussis.
In this review we systematically analyzed published literature on protection conferred by mucosal immunization against pertussis. Immune responses mounted by these vaccines are summarized.
The PubMed Library database was searched for published studies on mucosal pertussis vaccines. Eligibility criteria included mucosal administration and the evaluation of at least one outcome related to efficacy, immunogenicity and safety.
While over 349 publications were identified by the search, only 63 studies met the eligibility criteria. All eligible studies are included here. Initial attempts of mucosal whole-cell vaccine administration in humans provided promising results, but were not followed up. More recently, diverse vaccination strategies have been tested, including non-replicating and replicating vaccine candidates given by three different mucosal routes: orally, nasally or rectally. Several adjuvants and particulate formulations were tested to enhance the efficacy of non-replicating vaccines administered mucosally. Most novel vaccine candidates were only tested in animal models, mainly mice. Only one novel mucosal vaccine candidate was tested in baboons and in human trials.
Three vaccination strategies drew our attention, as they provided protective and durable immunity in the respiratory tract, including the upper respiratory tract: acellular vaccines adjuvanted with lipopeptide LP1569 and c-di-GMP, outer membrane vesicles and the live attenuated BPZE1 vaccine. Among all experimental vaccines, BPZE1 is the only one that has advanced into clinical development.
目前针对百日咳的疫苗接种策略并不理想。针对百日咳的病原体——百日咳博德特氏菌,最佳保护可能需要黏膜免疫。目前的百日咳疫苗由灭活的全细胞或其纯化抗原组成,与白喉和破伤风类毒素结合。尽管它们对严重的百日咳疾病具有高度保护作用,但它们无法引发黏膜免疫。与自然感染相比,免疫接种后的免疫反应持续时间短,无法阻止细菌在上呼吸道的定植。为了克服这些缺点,数十年来一直在努力开发针对百日咳的黏膜疫苗,并将继续努力。
在本综述中,我们系统地分析了已发表的关于黏膜免疫接种预防百日咳的文献。总结了这些疫苗产生的免疫反应。
在 PubMed 图书馆数据库中搜索了关于黏膜百日咳疫苗的已发表研究。入选标准包括黏膜给药和评估至少一项与疗效、免疫原性和安全性相关的结果。
通过检索共确定了 349 篇以上的出版物,但只有 63 项研究符合入选标准。所有符合条件的研究都包括在这里。最初尝试在人类中进行黏膜全细胞疫苗接种提供了有希望的结果,但没有后续行动。最近,已经测试了多种不同的疫苗接种策略,包括通过三种不同的黏膜途径(口服、鼻内或直肠)给予非复制和复制候选疫苗:口服、鼻内或直肠。已经测试了几种佐剂和颗粒制剂来增强黏膜给予的非复制疫苗的功效。大多数新型疫苗候选物仅在动物模型中进行了测试,主要是在小鼠中。只有一种新型黏膜疫苗候选物在狨猴和人体试验中进行了测试。
有三种疫苗接种策略引起了我们的注意,因为它们在呼吸道中提供了保护性和持久的免疫,包括上呼吸道:用脂肽 LP1569 和 c-di-GMP 佐剂的无细胞疫苗、外膜囊泡和减毒活疫苗 BPZE1。在所有实验疫苗中,BPZE1 是唯一一种进入临床开发阶段的疫苗。