Chauhan Payal, Behera Biswanath, Ding Delaney D, Lallas Aimilios, Khare Soumil, Enechukwu Nkechi Anne, Sławińska Martyna, Akay Bengu Nisa, Ankad Balachandra S, Bhat Yasmeen J, Jha Abhijeet Kumar, Kaliyadan Feroze, Kelati Awatef, Neema Shekhar, Parmar Nisha V, Stein Jennifer, Usatine Richard P, Vinay Keshavamurthy, Errichetti Enzo
Department of Dermatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, AIIMS, Bhubaneswar, India.
Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023 Oct 1;13(4 S1):e2023309S. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1304S1a309S.
Dermoscopy has been showed to facilitate the non-invasive recognition of several infectious disorders (infectiouscopy) thanks to the detection of peculiar clues. Although most of the knowledge on this topic comes from studies involving light-skinned patients, there is growing evidence about its use also in dark phototypes. This systematic literature review summarizes published data on dermoscopy of parasitic, bacterial, viral and fungal dermatoses (dermoscopic findings, used setting, pathological correlation, and level of evidence of studies) and provides a homogeneous terminology of reported dermoscopic features according to a standardized methodology. A total of 66 papers addressing 41 different dermatoses (14 bacterial, 5 viral, 11 fungal infections, and 11 parasitoses/bites and stings) and involving a total of 1096 instances were included in the analysis. The majority of them displayed a level of evidence of V (44 single case reports and 21 case series), with only 1 study showing a level of evidence of IV (case-control analysis). Moreover, our analysis also highlighted a high variability in the terminology used in the retrieved studies. Thus, although promising, further studies designed according to a systematic and standardized approach are needed for better characterization of dermoscopy of infectious skin infections.
皮肤镜已被证明有助于通过检测特殊线索对多种感染性疾病进行无创识别(感染性皮肤镜检查)。尽管关于这一主题的大部分知识来自涉及白皮肤患者的研究,但越来越多的证据表明其在深肤色类型中也有应用。本系统文献综述总结了关于寄生虫性、细菌性、病毒性和真菌性皮肤病皮肤镜检查的已发表数据(皮肤镜检查结果、使用背景、病理相关性以及研究的证据水平),并根据标准化方法提供了所报告皮肤镜特征的统一术语。分析共纳入66篇涉及41种不同皮肤病(14种细菌感染、5种病毒感染、11种真菌感染以及11种寄生虫感染/叮咬和蜇伤)且总共涉及1096例病例的论文。其中大多数显示证据水平为V(44篇单病例报告和21篇病例系列),只有1项研究显示证据水平为IV(病例对照分析)。此外,我们的分析还突出了检索到的研究中使用的术语存在高度变异性。因此,尽管前景广阔,但仍需要根据系统和标准化方法设计进一步的研究,以更好地描述感染性皮肤感染的皮肤镜检查特征。