Department of Psychology, University of Illinois At Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, USA.
Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, USA.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021 Dec;49(12):1607-1621. doi: 10.1007/s10802-021-00839-4. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
Negative emotionality (NE) and multiple cognitive vulnerabilities (CVs) (negative inferential style, brooding, self-criticism, dependency, dysfunctional attitudes) independently predict internalizing outcomes. The present study examined whether NE and CVs could be structurally integrated into a common factor reflecting shared variance across risks, and specific factors reflecting unique variance in risks. We evaluated the validity and utility of this integrated model via prospective prediction of future depression and anxiety compared to alternative models (NE and CVs individually, a correlated factor model). Youth from a large community sample (N = 571; M = 13.58 years old; 55% girls, 44% boys) reported on NE and CVs. Depression and anxiety symptoms based on youth report, and disorder onset based on youth and caregiver diagnostic interviews were assessed over a 1½ years follow-up. Results supported a structural model including a general NE-CV dimension and specific dimensions for NE, common cognitive risk, negative inferential style, and brooding; model invariance was obtained from late childhood through late adolescence and for girls and boys. The integrated general NE-CV factor more consistently and strongly predicted future depressive (β = 0.58) and anxiety (β = 0.56) symptoms, and onsets of depression (OR = 1.81) and anxiety (OR = 2.23) relative to NE and CV risk dimensions across alternative models (ps < .01). The general NE-CV dimension represents an important means to efficiently represent transdiagnostic risk for internalizing outcomes among youth.
负性情绪(NE)和多种认知脆弱性(CVs)(负性推理风格、沉思、自我批评、依赖、功能失调态度)独立预测内化结果。本研究考察了 NE 和 CV 是否可以在一个共同因素中结构上整合,该因素反映了风险之间的共享方差,以及特定因素反映了风险的独特方差。我们通过与替代模型(NE 和 CVs 个体、相关因素模型)相比,对未来抑郁和焦虑的前瞻性预测来评估这种综合模型的有效性和实用性。来自大社区样本的年轻人(N = 571;M = 13.58 岁;55%女孩,44%男孩)报告了 NE 和 CVs。基于青少年报告的抑郁和焦虑症状,以及基于青少年和照顾者诊断访谈的发病情况,在 1 年半的随访中进行评估。结果支持包括一般 NE-CV 维度和特定维度的结构模型,包括 NE、常见认知风险、负性推理风格和沉思;从童年后期到青春期后期以及对女孩和男孩都获得了模型不变性。综合的一般 NE-CV 因素更一致且强烈地预测了未来的抑郁(β = 0.58)和焦虑(β = 0.56)症状,以及抑郁(OR = 1.81)和焦虑(OR = 2.23)的发病,相对于替代模型中的 NE 和 CV 风险维度(p < .01)。一般的 NE-CV 维度代表了一种有效手段,可以有效地代表年轻人内化结果的跨诊断风险。