Ellingson Jarrod M, Richmond-Rakerd Leah S, Slutske Wendy S
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, Midwest Alcoholism Research Center.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 Jan;76(1):89-94.
Alcohol use and internalizing problems frequently co-occur. Cognitive control has been implicated in their etiology, but no studies have tested whether this construct helps explain the co-occurrence of these disorders.
A total of 1,313 undergraduate students completed assessments of cognitive control, negative emotionality, and symptoms of alcohol use disorder (AUD), depression, and generalized anxiety disorder. Structural equation models examined the extent to which overlap between AUD and internalizing problems was explained by variance specific to cognitive control and negative emotionality, as well as variance shared by both constructs.
Symptoms of AUD and internalizing disorders were modestly correlated (depression: r = .16; anxiety: r = .14). Variance specific to cognitive control explained a significant proportion of the correlation between AUD and both depression and generalized anxiety (depression: 19%; generalized anxiety: 18%), as did variance common to cognitive control and negative emotionality (depression: 24%; generalized anxiety: 31%). Consistent with previous work, variance specific to negative emotionality also explained a large and statistically significant proportion of the correlation between AUD and internalizing disorder symptoms. Of note, the residualized correlation for AUD symptom endorsement with both depression and generalized anxiety problems was not statistically significant after accounting for both cognitive control and negative emotionality.
This study provides new evidence that cognitive control may help explain the overlap between AUD and internalizing disorders while further supporting the contribution of negative emotionality to this overlap. RESULTS have implications for intervention efforts aimed at reducing comorbid alcohol use disorder and internalizing disorders, as well as general psychopathology.
饮酒与内化问题经常同时出现。认知控制与它们的病因有关,但尚无研究检验这一结构是否有助于解释这些障碍的共现情况。
共有1313名本科生完成了认知控制、负性情绪以及酒精使用障碍(AUD)、抑郁和广泛性焦虑症症状的评估。结构方程模型检验了AUD与内化问题之间的重叠程度,这一重叠程度由认知控制和负性情绪特有的方差以及这两种结构共有的方差来解释。
AUD症状与内化障碍症状呈中等程度相关(抑郁:r = 0.16;焦虑:r = 0.14)。认知控制特有的方差解释了AUD与抑郁和广泛性焦虑之间相关性的很大一部分(抑郁:19%;广泛性焦虑:18%),认知控制和负性情绪共有的方差也如此(抑郁:24%;广泛性焦虑:31%)。与先前的研究一致,负性情绪特有的方差也解释了AUD与内化障碍症状之间相关性的很大且具有统计学意义的一部分。值得注意的是,在考虑了认知控制和负性情绪之后,AUD症状认可与抑郁和广泛性焦虑问题的残差相关性无统计学意义。
本研究提供了新的证据,表明认知控制可能有助于解释AUD与内化障碍之间的重叠,同时进一步支持负性情绪对这种重叠的作用。研究结果对旨在减少酒精使用障碍和内化障碍共病以及一般精神病理学的干预措施具有启示意义。