Alfano Vincenzo, Ercolano Salvatore
Department of Structures for Engineering and Architectures, University of Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Center for Economic Studies - CESifo, Munich, Germany.
Soc Indic Res. 2022;159(1):101-123. doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02742-3. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
In order to control the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, during the first wave of the pandemic numerous countries decided to adopt lockdown policies. It had been a considerable time since such measures were last introduced, and the first time that they were implemented on such a global scale in a contemporary, information intensive society. The effectiveness of such measures may depend on how citizens perceive the capacity of government to set up and implement sound policies. Indeed, lockdown and confinement policies in general are binding measures that people are not used to, and which raise serious concerns among the population. For this reason governance quality could affect the perception of the benefits related to the government's choice to impose lockdown, making citizens more inclined to accept it and restrict their movements. In the present paper we empirically investigate the relation between the efficacy of lockdown and governance quality (measured through World Governance Indicators). Our results suggest that countries with higher levels of government effectiveness, rule of law and regulatory quality reach better results in adopting lockdown measures.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11205-021-02742-3.
为了控制新冠疫情的传播,在疫情的第一波期间,许多国家决定采取封锁政策。距离上次实施此类措施已经过去了相当长的时间,而且这是它们首次在当代信息密集型社会中如此大规模地实施。此类措施的有效性可能取决于公民如何看待政府制定和实施合理政策的能力。事实上,一般而言,封锁和限制政策是人们不习惯的约束性措施,会在民众中引发严重担忧。因此,治理质量可能会影响人们对政府实施封锁这一选择所带来好处的认知,使公民更倾向于接受并限制自己的行动。在本文中,我们实证研究了封锁效果与治理质量(通过世界治理指标衡量)之间的关系。我们的结果表明,在政府效能、法治和监管质量较高的国家,采取封锁措施能取得更好的效果。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11205-021-02742-3获取的补充材料。