• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素过敏测试对患者认知及抗生素使用的长期影响。

Long-term impacts of antibiotic allergy testing on patient perceptions and antibiotic utilization.

作者信息

Tan N, Holmes N E, Chua K Y, Stewardson A J, Trubiano J A

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases and Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Austin Hospital, VIC, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health and Central Clinical School, Monash University, VIC, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2019 Oct 22;1(2):dlz058. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlz058. eCollection 2019 Sep.

DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlz058
PMID:34222932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8210220/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To define the long-term impacts of antibiotic allergy testing (AAT) on patient allergy perception and antibiotic utilization.

METHODS

Patients were identified from a prospective AAT database as having completed testing during a 15 month period beginning January 2017. Patients were contacted for a follow-up survey at least 12 months post-AAT. For those contacted, baseline demographics, antibiotic allergy label (AAL) history, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, infection history, antibiotic de-labelling (≥1 AAL removed following AAT) and antibiotic usage for 12 months prior to testing (pre-AAT) and 12 months following testing (post-AAT) were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

From the follow-up survey of 112 patients post-AAT, 95.2% (59/62) of patients with complete AAL removal expressed willingness to use 'de-labelled' antibiotics and 91.9% (57/62) were adherent to allergy label modification. Comparing antibiotic utilization 12 months pre-AAT versus 12 months post-AAT, AAT was associated with a significant increase in preferred antibiotic therapy [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.29, 95% CI 1.56-6.92] and reduction in restricted antibiotic utilization (aOR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

An antimicrobial stewardship (AMS)-led AAT programme was safe and effective in the long term in the promotion of preferred and narrow-spectrum antibiotic usage, and favourable patient perception towards the AAT testing results was identified. This study further supports the routine incorporation of AAT into AMS programmes, confirming safety and durability of testing impacts on patients as well as increasing preferred antibiotic utilization.

摘要

目的

确定抗生素过敏检测(AAT)对患者过敏认知及抗生素使用的长期影响。

方法

从一个前瞻性AAT数据库中识别出在2017年1月开始的15个月期间完成检测的患者。在AAT后至少12个月对患者进行随访调查。对于被联系到的患者,记录每位患者的基线人口统计学信息、抗生素过敏标签(AAL)病史、年龄校正的Charlson合并症指数、感染史、抗生素去标签情况(AAT后去除≥1个AAL)以及检测前12个月(AAT前)和检测后12个月(AAT后)的抗生素使用情况。

结果

在对112例AAT后的患者进行随访调查中,完全去除AAL的患者中有95.2%(59/62)表示愿意使用“去标签”抗生素,91.9%(57/62)遵守过敏标签修改。比较AAT前12个月与AAT后12个月的抗生素使用情况,AAT与首选抗生素治疗的显著增加相关[调整优势比(aOR)3.29,95%可信区间1.56 - 6.92],且限制抗生素使用减少(aOR 0.42,95%可信区间0.19 - 0.93)。

结论

由抗菌药物管理(AMS)主导的AAT计划在长期内安全有效,可促进首选和窄谱抗生素的使用,且患者对AAT检测结果的认知良好。本研究进一步支持将AAT常规纳入AMS计划,证实了检测对患者影响的安全性和持续性,以及增加首选抗生素的使用。

相似文献

1
Long-term impacts of antibiotic allergy testing on patient perceptions and antibiotic utilization.抗生素过敏测试对患者认知及抗生素使用的长期影响。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2019 Oct 22;1(2):dlz058. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlz058. eCollection 2019 Sep.
2
Impact of an Integrated Antibiotic Allergy Testing Program on Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Multicenter Evaluation.整合抗生素过敏测试方案对抗菌药物管理的影响:一项多中心评估。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 1;65(1):166-174. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix244.
3
Evaluation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling ward round: a novel antimicrobial stewardship intervention.评价药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签病房查房:一种新的抗菌药物管理干预措施。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Jun 1;74(6):1725-1730. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz082.
4
Implementation of a pharmacist-led penicillin allergy de-labelling service in a public hospital.在一家公立医院实施药师主导的青霉素过敏去标签服务。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 May 1;74(5):1438-1446. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky575.
5
The Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Program: A Multicenter Whole-of-Hospital Health Services Intervention and Comparative Effectiveness Study.青霉素过敏标签去除计划:一项多中心全院卫生服务干预和比较效果研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;73(3):487-496. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa653.
6
Antimicrobial allergy 'labels' drive inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing: lessons for stewardship.抗菌药物过敏“标签”导致不适当的抗菌药物处方:管理的经验教训。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jun;71(6):1715-22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw008. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
7
Improving Antimicrobial Stewardship by Antibiotic Allergy Delabeling: Evaluation of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Throughout the Emerging Infections Network.通过抗生素过敏去标签化改善抗菌药物管理:对整个新发感染网络中的知识、态度和实践的评估
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Sep 3;3(3):ofw153. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw153. eCollection 2016 Sep.
8
Penicillin Allergy Assessment in Pregnancy: Safety and Impact on Antibiotic Use.孕期青霉素过敏评估:安全性及对抗生素使用的影响。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Mar;9(3):1338-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.10.063. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
9
The Effect of Penicillin Allergy Testing on Future Health Care Utilization: A Matched Cohort Study.青霉素过敏试验对未来医疗保健利用的影响:一项匹配队列研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 May-Jun;5(3):705-710. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
Antibiotic allergy labels-the impact of taking a clinical history.抗生素过敏标签——采集临床病史的影响
Int J Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;72(3):e13058. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13058. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Penicillin Allergy De-labeling Results in Significant Changes in Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns.青霉素过敏去标签化导致门诊抗生素处方模式发生显著变化。
Front Allergy. 2020 Dec 16;1:586301. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2020.586301. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
The Safety and Efficacy of an Oral Penicillin Challenge Program in Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Pilot Study.癌症患者口服青霉素激发试验项目的安全性与有效性:一项多中心试点研究。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 17;5(12):ofy306. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy306. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Impact of an Integrated Antibiotic Allergy Testing Program on Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Multicenter Evaluation.整合抗生素过敏测试方案对抗菌药物管理的影响:一项多中心评估。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 1;65(1):166-174. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix244.
3
Penicillin skin testing in hospitalized patients with β-lactam allergies: Effect on antibiotic selection and cost.对有β-内酰胺类过敏的住院患者进行青霉素皮肤试验:对抗生素选择和成本的影响。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Jul;117(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.04.021. Epub 2016 May 20.
4
Old but not forgotten: Antibiotic allergies in General Medicine (the AGM Study).老而未忘:普通医学中的抗生素过敏(AGM 研究)。
Med J Aust. 2016 Apr 18;204(7):273. doi: 10.5694/mja15.01329.
5
Routine Penicillin Skin Testing in Hospitalized Patients with a History of Penicillin Allergy.对有青霉素过敏史的住院患者进行常规青霉素皮肤试验。
Perm J. 2004 Summer;8(3):20-4. doi: 10.7812/TPP/04.934.
6
Improving the Effectiveness of Penicillin Allergy De-labeling.提高青霉素过敏标签去除的有效性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):365-34.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.11.002. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
7
The impact of penicillin skin testing on clinical practice and antimicrobial stewardship.青霉素皮肤试验对临床实践和抗菌药物管理的影响。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Jun;8(6):341-5. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2036. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
8
Penicillin skin testing in advance of need: multiyear follow-up in 568 test result-negative subjects exposed to oral penicillins.按需进行青霉素皮肤试验之前:对568名青霉素皮试结果阴性且口服过青霉素的受试者进行多年随访。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 May;111(5):1111-5. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.1385.