Pottash Michael, McCamey Danielle, Groninger Hunter, Aulisi Edward F, Chang Jason J
Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Department of Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Palliat Med Rep. 2020 Aug 14;1(1):161-165. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2020.0051. eCollection 2020.
Patients admitted to an acute care setting with a devastating brain injury are at high risk for morbidity and mortality. These patients and their families can benefit from the psychosocial and decision-making support of a palliative care consultation. We aim to investigate the characteristics and impact of palliative care consultation for patients under the management of neurosurgical and critical care services with a devastating brain injury in a neurological intensive care unit (ICU) at a large tertiary-care hospital. Data were collected by retrospective review of the electronic medical record and metrics collected by the palliative care service. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess effect of timing of palliative care consultation. Fifty-five patients admitted to the neurological ICU under the management of the neurosurgical service received a palliative care consultation for the following: hemorrhagic stroke (49%), metastatic cancer (22%), and traumatic brain injury (18%). Of these, 73% had at least one neurosurgical intervention. Palliative care was most frequently consulted for assistance in defining a patient's goals of care (88%). When compared with late consultation, early palliative care consultation was significantly associated with shorter mean length of stay (LOS) and positively correlated in linear regression analysis without an effect on mortality. When compared with a late consultation, early palliative care consultation corresponded to shorter LOS without increasing mortality. One reason for this effect may be that palliative care can help to clarify and document goals of care earlier and more concretely.
因严重脑损伤入住急症护理机构的患者,发生发病和死亡的风险很高。这些患者及其家属可从姑息治疗咨询提供的心理社会和决策支持中受益。我们旨在调查在一家大型三级医院的神经重症监护病房(ICU)中,接受神经外科和重症监护服务管理且患有严重脑损伤的患者接受姑息治疗咨询的特征和影响。通过回顾电子病历以及姑息治疗服务收集的指标来收集数据。使用描述性统计方法对数据进行分析。进行线性回归分析以评估姑息治疗咨询时机的影响。在神经外科服务管理下入住神经ICU的55名患者接受了姑息治疗咨询,原因如下:出血性中风(49%)、转移性癌症(22%)和创伤性脑损伤(18%)。其中,73%的患者至少接受过一次神经外科干预。姑息治疗咨询最常被用于协助确定患者的护理目标(88%)。与晚期咨询相比,早期姑息治疗咨询与较短的平均住院时间(LOS)显著相关,并且在无死亡率影响的线性回归分析中呈正相关。与晚期咨询相比,早期姑息治疗咨询对应的住院时间更短且不增加死亡率。这种效果的一个原因可能是姑息治疗有助于更早、更具体地明确和记录护理目标。