Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Equality / Mental health, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Knowledge Management and Co-creation / Knowledge Base for Health and Welfare Management, Tampere, Finland.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 7;21(1):1335. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11396-2.
Living alone has increased globally and especially in Finland where 45% of all households are single occupancy. Epidemiological research has found that living alone a risk factor for a wide range of adversities related to quality of life but the rapidly-changing demographics of people living alone calls for a more detailed investigation of their subjective health status.
Using a cross-sectional survey sent for a random sample of Finnish residents in single-person households (n = 884), we explored with latent class analysis whether the respondents form different health profiles based on the three health dimensions defined by the World Health Organization: physical, social, and mental well-being. The identified groups were then compared in terms of demographic characteristics with the χ test and quality of life using linear regression models. Sensitivity analyses were run using more refined, manual 3-step BCH method.
Four distinct health profiles were found: Languishing (4%), Managing (35%), Healthy (30%), and Flourishing (31%). The groups differed in most socio-demographic aspects such as marital and employment status, but not in terms of geographic location or gender (apart from group Languishing that contained more men). Controlling for these socio-demographic differences, all groups showed different average levels of perceived quality of life to the expected direction.
Our findings suggest that people living alone are indeed a very heterogeneous group in terms of subjective health. Instead of seeing living alone as a mere risk for low quality of life, concept of living alone should be understood more broadly both in public discussion and scientific research.
独居现象在全球范围内呈上升趋势,芬兰尤为明显,有 45%的家庭都是单人居住。流行病学研究发现,独居是与生活质量相关的多种不良后果的一个风险因素,但独居人群的人口统计学特征迅速变化,需要对他们的主观健康状况进行更详细的调查。
我们使用横断面调查,对芬兰单人住户的随机样本(n=884)进行了调查,使用潜在类别分析方法,根据世界卫生组织定义的三个健康维度(身体、社会和心理健康),探索受访者是否基于这三个维度形成不同的健康状况。然后,使用 χ 检验和线性回归模型,比较了不同组别的人口统计学特征和生活质量。我们还进行了敏感性分析,使用了更精细的手动 3 步 BCH 方法。
我们发现了四种不同的健康状况:萎靡不振(4%)、管理良好(35%)、健康(30%)和蓬勃发展(31%)。这些组在大多数社会人口统计学方面存在差异,如婚姻和就业状况,但在地理位置或性别方面没有差异(除了萎靡不振组,其中男性较多)。在控制了这些社会人口统计学差异后,所有组的生活质量感知水平都与预期方向不同。
我们的研究结果表明,独居者在主观健康方面确实是一个非常多样化的群体。我们不应将独居视为生活质量低下的单纯风险因素,而应在公众讨论和科学研究中更广泛地理解独居的概念。