Department of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Br J Radiol. 2021 Aug 1;94(1124):20201306. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201306. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
Computed tomography (CT) allows reproducible assessment of left ventricular (LV) function, left ventricular outflow tract area (LVOT) and aortic valve area (AVA). We evaluated the influence of image reconstruction parameters on these measurements.
We analyzed 45 contrast-enhanced, retrospectively ECG-gated CT datasets acquired on a third-generation dual source system. A standard filtered-back-projection data set (20 cardiac phases (5% steps, 0-95%), 0.6-mm-slice thickness, 512 × 512 matrix) and eight reconstructions with modified slice thickness (1-8 mm), number of cardiac phases (5, 10), matrix size (256×256) and an iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm were obtained. LV parameters (ejection fraction (EF), stroke volume (SV), end-diastolic (EDV), end-systolic volumes (ESV)), LVOT and AVA were assessed.
Differences in LV parameters, LVOT and AVA, were only minimal between standard reconstructions and those with modified matrix size, IR algorithm and ≤2 mm slice thickness, while reconstructions with 8-mm slice thickness significantly overestimated SV ( < 0.001) and EDV ( = 0.016). AVA planimetry in reconstructions with ≥5 mm slice thickness was not feasible in 56% of patients. A decrease in the number of reconstructed phases (10 or 5) underestimated EF, SV, EDV, LVOT and AVA and overestimated ESV.
Modifications of reconstruction parameters (except a slice thickness ≤2 mm) have only a marginal effect on LV, LVOT and AVA assessment. However, a reduced number of reconstructions per cardiac cycle may significantly influence measurements.
Substantial modifications in number of reconstructions per cardiac cycle significantly affect the assessment of LV function, LVOT and AVA also in modern CT scanners.
计算机断层扫描(CT)允许对左心室(LV)功能、左心室流出道面积(LVOT)和主动脉瓣口面积(AVA)进行可重复的评估。我们评估了图像重建参数对这些测量的影响。
我们分析了在第三代双源系统上采集的 45 例对比增强、回顾性 ECG 门控 CT 数据集。获得了一个标准滤波反投影数据集(20 个心脏相位(5%步长,0-95%),0.6-mm 层厚,512×512 矩阵)和 8 个具有修改层厚(1-8mm)、心脏相位数(5、10)、矩阵大小(256×256)和迭代重建(IR)算法的重建。评估了 LV 参数(射血分数(EF)、每搏量(SV)、舒张末期(EDV)、收缩末期容积(ESV))、LVOT 和 AVA。
标准重建与具有修改矩阵大小、IR 算法和≤2mm 层厚的重建之间,LV 参数、LVOT 和 AVA 的差异仅很小,而 8mm 层厚的重建显著高估 SV(<0.001)和 EDV(=0.016)。在≥5mm 层厚的重建中,56%的患者无法进行 AVA 平面测量。重建中重建相位数减少(10 或 5)会低估 EF、SV、EDV、LVOT 和 AVA,并高估 ESV。
重建参数的修改(除了层厚≤2mm)仅对 LV、LVOT 和 AVA 评估有轻微影响。然而,每个心动周期的重建次数减少可能会显著影响测量。
在现代 CT 扫描仪中,每个心动周期重建次数的大量修改显著影响 LV 功能、LVOT 和 AVA 的评估。