• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项肿瘤运动干预成本评估:所有化疗试验中的运动。

Cost evaluation of an exercise oncology intervention: The exercise in all chemotherapy trial.

机构信息

Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Mar;5(3):e1490. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1490. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1002/cnr2.1490
PMID:34236137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8955063/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is strong evidence supporting the efficacy of exercise oncology programs to improve physical and psychosocial outcomes during active treatment. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the effect of exercise on healthcare utilization and cost analyzes of exercise oncology programs.

AIMS

Our objective was to assess the effects of a pragmatic exercise oncology program (ENACT) during active chemotherapy treatment on healthcare utilization and associated costs.

METHODS

We conducted post-hoc analyzes on 160 ENACT participants and 75 comparison participants matched on cancer site, stage, age range, and gender. We obtained complete healthcare utilization histories for each patient (specific to emergency department [ED] visits and hospital admissions) coinciding with their participation in ENACT. A sub-analysis was conducted for advanced stage breast, gastrointestinal, and pancreatic cancer patients.

RESULTS

Healthcare costs for patients who participated in the ENACT exercise oncology intervention were numerically lower than healthcare costs for the comparison group, even after accounting for the cost of the intervention. However, the differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that an exercise oncology program during active chemotherapy treatment are at least cost neutral for all cancer patients, including advanced stage cancers. Additional research is warranted to evaluate the potential for exercise oncology programs to reduce healthcare utilization, particularly in advanced cancer patients.

摘要

背景

有大量证据支持运动肿瘤学方案在积极治疗期间改善身体和心理社会结果的疗效。然而,关于运动肿瘤学方案对医疗保健利用的影响以及对其成本分析的证据有限。

目的

我们的目的是评估积极化疗期间实用运动肿瘤学方案(ENACT)对医疗保健利用和相关成本的影响。

方法

我们对 160 名 ENACT 参与者和 75 名按癌症部位、分期、年龄范围和性别匹配的对照组参与者进行了事后分析。我们为每位患者获得了完整的医疗保健利用史(具体针对急诊就诊和住院),与他们参与 ENACT 相吻合。对晚期乳腺癌、胃肠道癌和胰腺癌患者进行了亚分析。

结果

尽管考虑了干预的成本,但参与 ENACT 运动肿瘤学干预的患者的医疗保健成本在数值上低于对照组的医疗保健成本。然而,差异没有统计学意义。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,对于所有癌症患者,包括晚期癌症患者,在积极化疗期间实施运动肿瘤学方案至少在成本上是中性的。需要进一步的研究来评估运动肿瘤学方案在减少医疗保健利用方面的潜力,特别是在晚期癌症患者中。

相似文献

1
Cost evaluation of an exercise oncology intervention: The exercise in all chemotherapy trial.一项肿瘤运动干预成本评估:所有化疗试验中的运动。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2022 Mar;5(3):e1490. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1490. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
2
A healthcare utilization cost comparison between employees receiving a worksite mindfulness or a diet/exercise lifestyle intervention to matched controls 5 years post intervention.对接受工作场所正念干预或饮食/运动生活方式干预的员工与匹配的对照组在干预后5年的医疗保健利用成本进行比较。
Complement Ther Med. 2016 Aug;27:139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 27.
3
Association of Participation in the Oncology Care Model With Medicare Payments, Utilization, Care Delivery, and Quality Outcomes.参与肿瘤治疗模式与医疗保险支付、利用、医疗服务提供和质量结果的关联。
JAMA. 2021 Nov 9;326(18):1829-1839. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17642.
4
Oncology and Palliative Care Integration Model: A Cost Analysis Study in a Brazilian Hospital Setting.肿瘤学与姑息治疗整合模式:巴西医院环境下的成本分析研究。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Dec;41(12):1451-1458. doi: 10.1177/10499091241232401. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
5
6
Cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes enhanced by self-management strategies to battle sedentary behaviour in older adults: protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the SITLESS three-armed pragmatic randomised controlled trial.通过自我管理策略加强运动转诊计划以对抗老年人久坐行为的成本效益:与SITLESS三臂实用随机对照试验同时进行的经济评估方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 15;8(10):e022266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022266.
7
Evaluation of Oncology Hospital at Home: Unplanned Health Care Utilization and Costs in the Huntsman at Home Real-World Trial.居家肿瘤医院评估: Huntsman 居家真实试验中的非计划性医疗保健利用和成本。
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 10;39(23):2586-2593. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.03609. Epub 2021 May 17.
8
Cost Savings Analysis of Individualized Exercise Oncology Programs.个体化运动肿瘤学项目的成本节约分析。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2019 Jan-Dec;18:1534735419839466. doi: 10.1177/1534735419839466.
9
Cost and healthcare utilization analysis of culturally sensitive, shared medical appointment model for Latino children with type 1 diabetes.文化敏感型、共享医疗预约模式对 1 型糖尿病拉丁裔儿童的成本和医疗利用分析。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 Aug;22(5):816-822. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13218. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
Ambulatory Toxicity Management (AToM) in patients receiving adjuvant or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer - a pragmatic cluster randomized trial protocol.接受辅助或新辅助化疗的早期乳腺癌患者的门诊毒性管理(AToM) - 一项实用的聚类随机试验方案。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6099-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical Activity and Childhood Cancer: Present Status and Future Directions.体力活动与儿童癌症:现状与未来方向
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025 Aug 20:15598276251368342. doi: 10.1177/15598276251368342.
2
Exercise during chemotherapy: Friend or foe?化疗期间运动:是敌是友?
Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(9):10715-10724. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5831. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

1
The exercise in all chemotherapy trial.所有化疗试验中的运动。
Cancer. 2021 May 1;127(9):1507-1516. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33390. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Cost-effectiveness of an exercise and nutritional intervention versus usual nutritional care during adjuvant treatment for localized breast cancer: the PASAPAS randomized controlled trial.局部乳腺癌辅助治疗期间运动和营养干预与常规营养护理的成本效益比较:PASAPAS 随机对照试验。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jun;28(6):2829-2842. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05078-4. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors: Consensus Statement from International Multidisciplinary Roundtable.癌症康复者运动指南:国际多学科圆桌会议的共识声明。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Nov;51(11):2375-2390. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002116.
4
Exercise is medicine in oncology: Engaging clinicians to help patients move through cancer.运动是肿瘤学的良药:让临床医生参与进来,帮助患者战胜癌症。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Nov;69(6):468-484. doi: 10.3322/caac.21579. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
5
Potentially Avoidable Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Advanced Cancer.晚期癌症患者的潜在可避免的医院再入院。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 May;15(5):e420-e427. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00595. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
6
Global treatment costs of breast cancer by stage: A systematic review.全球各分期乳腺癌的治疗费用:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0207993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207993. eCollection 2018.
7
(Cost-)effectiveness of an internet-based physical activity support program (with and without physiotherapy counselling) on physical activity levels of breast and prostate cancer survivors: design of the PABLO trial.基于互联网的体育活动支持计划(结合和不结合物理治疗咨询)对乳腺癌和前列腺癌幸存者体育活动水平的成本效益:PABLO 试验的设计。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 6;18(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4927-z.
8
Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of oncologists and oncology health care providers in promoting physical activity to cancer survivors: an international survey.肿瘤学家和肿瘤医疗保健提供者在促进癌症幸存者身体活动方面的知识、态度和实践:一项国际调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Nov;26(11):3711-3719. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4230-1. Epub 2018 May 8.
9
Best Practices for Reducing Unplanned Acute Care for Patients With Cancer.降低癌症患者非计划性急性护理的最佳实践。
J Oncol Pract. 2018 May;14(5):306-313. doi: 10.1200/JOP.17.00081. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
10
Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high versus low-to-moderate intensity resistance and endurance exercise interventions among cancer survivors.高强度与中低强度抗阻和耐力运动干预对癌症幸存者的长期效果和成本效益。
J Cancer Surviv. 2018 Jun;12(3):417-429. doi: 10.1007/s11764-018-0681-0. Epub 2018 Mar 1.