Suppr超能文献

新型靶向药物治疗 ERBB2 阳性转移性乳腺癌的治疗模式和结局。

Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Novel Targeted Agents for the Treatment of ERBB2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;7(9):e212140. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2140. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Clinical trials have shown that the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based chemotherapy for first-line treatment of ERBB2-positive metastatic breast cancer is associated with considerable improvement in overall survival (OS). In the second-line setting, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) improves OS compared with capecitabine/lapatinib in patients previously treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. However, there are few data describing long-term real-world outcomes with these agents.

OBJECTIVE

To describe practice patterns and outcomes associated with pertuzumab and T-DM1 in routine clinical practice.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based retrospective cohort study used the Ontario Cancer Registry linked to electronic treatment databases to identify all patients treated with pertuzumab and T-DM1 following reimbursement approval in Ontario, Canada, which has a single-payer public health system. Participants included women with stage IV ERBB2-positive metastatic breast cancer receiving treatment with pertuzumab for first-line metastatic indication from December 2013 through December 2017, and those treated with T-DM1 from May 2014 through December 2017. Pertuzumab and T-DM1 cohorts were analyzed separately. Data were analyzed December 2019 to December 2020.

EXPOSURES

Treatment with pertuzumab or T-DM1.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was OS, determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with OS were identified using a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of the 795 women who received pertuzumab and 506 women who received T-DM1 was 57 (49-67) and 56 (48-66) years, respectively. Among the cohort of patients who received pertuzumab, the median (IQR) OS and time on treatment was 43 (16.2-unavailable) and 14 (6.0-26.2) months, respectively. In the T-DM1 cohort, the proportion of pertuzumab-naive patients decreased over time from 68 of 91 [74.7%] in 2014 to 16 of 89 [18.0%] in 2017 (P < .001). The median (IQR) OS and time on treatment was 15 (6.7-27.7) and 4 (1.4-9.0) months, respectively. Median OS was shorter for patients with prior pertuzumab treatment than in the pertuzumab-naive subgroup (12 vs 19 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this population-based cohort study, the survival of patients treated with pertuzumab and T-DM1 in routine practice appeared inferior to results from pivotal clinical trials. Differences in outcome likely reflect differences in patient population and previous lines of therapy in routine practice. Further work is needed to understand the effectiveness of T-DM1 after pertuzumab exposure.

摘要

重要性

临床试验表明,在曲妥珠单抗为基础的化疗一线治疗 ERBB2 阳性转移性乳腺癌时,加入帕妥珠单抗可显著改善总生存期(OS)。在二线治疗中,与卡培他滨/拉帕替尼相比,曲妥珠单抗emtansine(T-DM1)可改善先前接受过曲妥珠单抗为基础化疗的患者的 OS。然而,很少有数据描述这些药物在长期真实世界中的应用。

目的

描述在常规临床实践中使用帕妥珠单抗和 T-DM1 的实践模式和结果。

设计、地点和参与者:本基于人群的回顾性队列研究使用安大略癌症登记处与电子治疗数据库相关联,以确定在加拿大安大略省接受过帕妥珠单抗和 T-DM1 治疗的患者,这些患者在接受过曲妥珠单抗为基础的化疗的转移性疾病一线治疗后获得了报销批准,安大略省拥有单一支付的公共卫生系统。参与者包括接受曲妥珠单抗一线转移性适应证治疗的 IV 期 ERBB2 阳性转移性乳腺癌患者(2013 年 12 月至 2017 年 12 月),以及接受 T-DM1 治疗的患者(2014 年 5 月至 2017 年 12 月)。分别对帕妥珠单抗和 T-DM1 队列进行分析。数据于 2019 年 12 月至 2020 年 12 月进行分析。

暴露

接受帕妥珠单抗或 T-DM1 治疗。

主要结果和测量

主要结局是 OS,使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法确定。使用 Cox 比例风险模型确定与 OS 相关的因素。

结果

795 名接受帕妥珠单抗和 506 名接受 T-DM1 治疗的女性的中位(四分位距 [IQR])年龄分别为 57(49-67)和 56(48-66)岁。在接受帕妥珠单抗治疗的患者队列中,中位(IQR)OS 和治疗时间分别为 43(16.2-无可用)和 14(6.0-26.2)个月。在 T-DM1 队列中,在 2014 年至 2017 年期间,无先前接受过帕妥珠单抗治疗的患者比例从 91 例中的 68 例(74.7%)下降至 89 例中的 16 例(18.0%)(P < .001)。中位(IQR)OS 和治疗时间分别为 15(6.7-27.7)和 4(1.4-9.0)个月。与无先前接受过帕妥珠单抗治疗的亚组相比,先前接受过帕妥珠单抗治疗的患者的中位 OS 更短(12 个月 vs 19 个月;调整后的危险比,0.70;95%CI,0.55-0.89;P = .004)。

结论和相关性

在这项基于人群的队列研究中,在常规实践中接受帕妥珠单抗和 T-DM1 治疗的患者的生存情况似乎不如关键性临床试验的结果。结果差异可能反映了患者人群和常规实践中先前的治疗线的差异。需要进一步的工作来了解 T-DM1 在暴露于帕妥珠单抗后的有效性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
MCM3AP-AS1: An Indispensable Cancer-Related LncRNA.MCM3AP-AS1:一种不可或缺的癌症相关长链非编码RNA。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Oct 7;9:752718. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.752718. eCollection 2021.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验