• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并验证了西班牙语版 MARA 量表,用于评估与乳腺癌预防相关的知识、感知风险和障碍。

Development and validation of the MARA scale in Spanish to assess knowledge and perceived risks and barriers relating to breast cancer prevention.

机构信息

Hospital Cruz Roja Gijón, Gijón, Spain.

Equipo de Investigación Precam, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Nov;32(11):1237-1245. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01473-7. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1007/s10552-021-01473-7
PMID:34236574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8492559/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a measurement instrument for assessing knowledge of breast cancer and perceived risk of developing the disease (MARA).

METHODS

641 women with a mean age of 36.19 years (SD = 7.49) participated in the study. Data collection took place during 2019 and included sociodemographic data, data on history of cancer and breast cancer, perceived risk, and feelings of concern about developing breast cancer. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and structural validity were tested.

RESULTS

The questionnaire items comprise 4 subscales: risk factors (9 items), signs and symptoms (9 items), perceived risk (6 items), barriers (7 items). A factor analysis revealed that the first two subscales had two dimensions each, whereas the other two subscales had one dimension each. Each subscale was shown to have adequate reliability (α = 0.74-0.92) and temporal stability (r = 0.201-0.906), as well as strong evidence of validity in relation to a questionnaire on breast cancer knowledge (r = 0.131-0.434). In addition, the subscales were shown to have high discriminatory power in terms of the presence or absence of a history of cancer or breast cancer, perceived risk, and feelings of concern.

CONCLUSION

The MARA questionnaire represents a valid, reliable tool for assessing Spanish women's knowledge, risks, perceptions, and barriers regarding breast cancer.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在开发一种评估乳腺癌知识和对疾病发病风险的感知(MARA)的测量工具。

方法

641 名年龄平均为 36.19 岁(SD=7.49)的女性参与了这项研究。数据收集于 2019 年进行,包括社会人口统计学数据、癌症和乳腺癌病史、感知风险以及对患乳腺癌的担忧感。本研究对内部一致性、重测信度、聚合效度和结构效度进行了检验。

结果

问卷项目包含 4 个分量表:危险因素(9 项)、体征和症状(9 项)、感知风险(6 项)、障碍(7 项)。因子分析显示,前两个分量表各有两个维度,而其他两个分量表各有一个维度。每个分量表的信度(α=0.74-0.92)和时间稳定性(r=0.201-0.906)均足够,与乳腺癌知识问卷的相关性也有充分的效度证据(r=0.131-0.434)。此外,该问卷在癌症或乳腺癌病史、感知风险和担忧感的有无方面具有较高的区分度。

结论

MARA 问卷是一种评估西班牙女性对乳腺癌知识、风险、认知和障碍的有效、可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the MARA scale in Spanish to assess knowledge and perceived risks and barriers relating to breast cancer prevention.开发并验证了西班牙语版 MARA 量表,用于评估与乳腺癌预防相关的知识、感知风险和障碍。
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Nov;32(11):1237-1245. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01473-7. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
2
Validity and Reliability of Health Belief Model Questionnaire for Promoting Breast Self-examination and Screening Mammogram for Early Cancer Detection.用于促进乳房自我检查和乳房X光筛查以早期发现癌症的健康信念模式问卷的效度和信度
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Sep 1;20(9):2865-2873. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.9.2865.
3
Validation of a susceptibility, benefits, and barrier scale for mammography screening among Peruvian women: a cross-sectional study.验证秘鲁女性乳腺癌筛查的易感性、益处和障碍量表:一项横断面研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2011 Dec 7;11:54. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-54.
4
Reliability and validity of the Champion's Health Belief Model Scale among Lithuanian women.立陶宛女性中冠军健康信念模型量表的信度与效度
Cancer Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;30(3):E20-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000270711.72413.a6.
5
Development and validation of an instrument assessing women's satisfaction with screening mammography in an organized breast cancer screening program.在一项有组织的乳腺癌筛查项目中,评估女性对乳腺钼靶筛查满意度的工具的开发与验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 8;14:9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-9.
6
Transcultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the breast cancer awareness measure (BCAM) questionnaire.跨文化调适与验证乳腺癌认知测量表(BCAM)波斯文版本。
Cancer Med. 2018 Oct;7(10):5237-5251. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1740. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
7
Developing and testing an instrument for identifying culture-specific barriers to breast cancer screening in Israeli Arab women.开发并测试一种用于识别以色列阿拉伯女性乳腺癌筛查中特定文化障碍的工具。
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(8):1570-7. doi: 10.1080/02841860802078069.
8
Women's knowledge about breast cancer. Dimensions of knowledge and scale development.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1993 Oct;16(5):446-54. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199310000-00013.
9
Development and validation of the African Women Awareness of CANcer (AWACAN) tool for breast and cervical cancer.开发和验证用于乳腺癌和宫颈癌的非洲妇女癌症意识(AWACAN)工具。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 6;14(8):e0220545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220545. eCollection 2019.
10
Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess delay in treatment for breast cancer.评估乳腺癌治疗延迟的问卷的制定和验证。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Dec 28;12:626. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-626.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation and analysis of the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the MARA questionnaire to assess breast cancer awareness.适用于评估乳腺癌认知度的MARA问卷中文版的心理测量特性的改编与分析。
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s10552-025-02050-y.
2
Risk perception of non-communicable diseases: A systematic review on its assessment and associated factors.非传染性疾病风险感知:评估及其相关因素的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 1;18(6):e0286518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286518. eCollection 2023.
3
Explaining sexual self-care status and its predictor factors in women referring to healthcare centers of Sari, Iran, 2021.探讨 2021 年伊朗萨里医疗中心女性的性自我保健状况及其预测因素。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Feb 8;23(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02196-4.
4
Use a web-app to improve breast cancer risk factors and symptoms knowledge and adherence to healthy diet and physical activity in women without breast cancer diagnosis (Precam project).使用网络应用程序提高乳腺癌风险因素和症状知识,并促进未被诊断出患有乳腺癌的女性坚持健康饮食和体育锻炼(Precam 项目)。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Feb;34(2):113-122. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01647-x. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of competitive cognitive models in explanation of women breast cancer screening behaviours using structural equation modelling: Health belief model and theory of reasoned action.运用结构方程模型比较竞争认知模型对女性乳腺癌筛查行为的解释:健康信念模型和理性行为理论。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Jan;30(1):e13328. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13328. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Risk-tailored starting age of breast cancer screening based on women's reproductive profile: A nationwide cohort study.基于女性生殖特征的乳腺癌筛查起始年龄的风险定制:一项全国性队列研究。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jan;124:207-213. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
3
"A Natural Progression": Australian Women's Attitudes About an Individualized Breast Screening Model.“自然而然的演进”:澳大利亚女性对个体化乳房筛查模式的态度。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019 Jun;12(6):383-390. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0443. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
4
Hong Kong female's breast cancer awareness measure: Cross-sectional survey.香港女性乳腺癌认知度调查:横断面研究
World J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 24;10(2):98-109. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i2.98.
5
[Ten steps for test development].[测试开发的十个步骤]
Psicothema. 2019 Feb;31(1):7-16. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.291.
6
Primary prevention: a need for concerted action.一级预防:需要协同行动。
Mol Oncol. 2019 Mar;13(3):567-578. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12432. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
7
An Intervention Tool to Increase Patient-Physician Discussion of Lifestyle Risk Factors for Breast Cancer.一种增加医患间针对乳腺癌生活方式风险因素讨论的干预工具。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Nov;28(11):1468-1475. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7026. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
8
Women's perceptions of the adoption of personalised risk-based breast cancer screening and primary prevention: a systematic review.女性对采用基于个体化风险的乳腺癌筛查和初级预防措施的看法:系统评价。
Acta Oncol. 2018 Oct;57(10):1275-1283. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1481291. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
9
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Aten Primaria. 2018 May;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):41-65. doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(18)30362-7.
10
[Not Available].[不可用]。
Aten Primaria. 2018 May;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/S0212-6567(18)30361-5.