• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第二代超薄与标准厚度药物洗脱支架的长期疗效比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。

Long term outcomes of ultrathin versus standard thickness second-generation drug eluting stents: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology New Haven, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Yale Cardiovascular Research Group, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):563-574. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29866. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.29866
PMID:34236755
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identify the effect of ultrathin drug eluting stents on long term outcomes in coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND

Although second-generation drug eluting stents (DES) are superior to first-generation DES, persistence of adverse outcomes has led to continued refinement in design. Ultrathin second-generation DES have been shown to improve outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Beyond 1-year their effect remains unknown.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Database were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared ultrathin (defined as <70 um) to standard thickness second-generation DES. Studies were chosen according to the PROSPERO protocol (CRD42020185374). Data from randomized controlled trials were pooled using random-effects model (Mantel-Haenszel). The primary outcome was target lesion failure (TLF) at 2 years, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. Secondary outcomes included TLF at 3 and 5 years, the components of TLF and definite or probable stent thrombosis. Differences in outcomes between groups were presented in Forest plots as risk ratios (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each trial.

RESULTS

We identified 18 publications from 10 trials with14,649 patients. At 2-years there was a significant 12% reduction in TLF (RR, 0.88; 95% CI 0.78-0.99; p < 0.05) associated with the use of ultrathin DES. At 3-years, there was a significant 19% reduction in TLF with ultrathin DES (RR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.98; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, ultrathin DES improve long term clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

确定超薄药物洗脱支架对冠状动脉疾病长期结局的影响。

背景

虽然第二代药物洗脱支架(DES)优于第一代 DES,但不良结局的持续存在导致设计不断改进。超薄第二代 DES 在 1 年随访时显示出改善结局的效果。超过 1 年,其效果仍未知。

方法

使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库搜索比较超薄(定义为 <70μm)和标准厚度第二代 DES 的随机对照试验。根据 PROSPERO 方案(CRD42020185374)选择研究。使用随机效应模型(Mantel-Haenszel)对随机对照试验的数据进行汇总。主要结局是 2 年时的靶病变失败(TLF),由心脏死亡、靶血管心肌梗死和缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建组成。次要结局包括 3 年和 5 年时的 TLF、TLF 的组成部分以及确定或可能的支架血栓形成。两组之间的结局差异以每个试验的风险比(RR)及其相应的 95%置信区间(CI)表示,呈森林图形式呈现。

结果

我们从 10 项试验中确定了 18 项出版物,共纳入 14649 名患者。在 2 年时,使用超薄 DES 可使 TLF 降低 12%(RR,0.88;95%CI,0.78-0.99;p<0.05)。在 3 年时,使用超薄 DES 可使 TLF 降低 19%(RR,0.79;95%CI,0.64-0.98;p<0.05)。

结论

在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,超薄 DES 可改善长期临床结局。

相似文献

1
Long term outcomes of ultrathin versus standard thickness second-generation drug eluting stents: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.第二代超薄与标准厚度药物洗脱支架的长期疗效比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(3):563-574. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29866. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
2
Comparative effectiveness of ultrathin vs. standard strut drug-eluting stents: insights from a large-scale meta-analysis with extended follow-up.超小径药物洗脱支架与标准支架的比较效果:一项具有延长随访的大规模荟萃分析的见解。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 27;29(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01949-7.
3
Long-term follow-up after ultrathin vs. conventional 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.超薄型与传统第二代药物洗脱支架的长期随访:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 15;42(27):2643-2654. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab280.
4
Differential Effects of Newer-Generation Ultrathin-Strut Versus Thicker-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Chronic and Acute Coronary Syndromes.新一代超薄支架与厚壁支架药物洗脱支架在慢性和急性冠状动脉综合征中的差异效应。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 22;14(22):2461-2473. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.028.
5
Newer-Generation Ultrathin Strut Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Older Second-Generation Thicker Strut Drug-Eluting Stents for Coronary Artery Disease.新一代超小径药物洗脱支架与上一代较厚支架药物洗脱支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的比较。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 13;138(20):2216-2226. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034456.
6
Five-Year Outcomes of Biodegradable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Second-Generation Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.生物可降解聚合物药物洗脱支架与第二代耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的 5 年结果:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2019 Oct;33(5):557-566. doi: 10.1007/s10557-019-06912-x.
7
Safety and efficacy of ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架的安全性和有效性:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0902-5.
8
Comparison of newer-generation drug-eluting with bare-metal stents in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a pooled analysis of the EXAMINATION (clinical Evaluation of the Xience-V stent in Acute Myocardial INfArcTION) and COMFORTABLE-AMI (Comparison of Biolimus Eluted From an Erodible Stent Coating With Bare Metal Stents in Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) trials.比较新一代药物洗脱支架和裸金属支架在急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用:EXAMINATION(急性心肌梗死中评价 Xience-V 支架的临床研究)和 COMFORTABLE-AMI(急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中生物可降解涂层雷帕霉素洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较研究)试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
9
Coronary Calcification and Long-Term Outcomes According to Drug-Eluting Stent Generation.冠状动脉钙化与药物洗脱支架世代与长期预后。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jun 22;13(12):1417-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.053.
10
Ultrathin-strut biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.超薄支柱可生物降解聚合物与耐用聚合物药物洗脱支架:一项荟萃分析。
Open Heart. 2020 Oct;7(2). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001394.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of ultrathin vs. standard strut drug-eluting stents: insights from a large-scale meta-analysis with extended follow-up.超小径药物洗脱支架与标准支架的比较效果:一项具有延长随访的大规模荟萃分析的见解。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 27;29(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01949-7.
2
In-Hospital and 1-Year Clinical Results from the French Registry Using Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Coronary Artery Disease.法国注册研究中急性冠脉综合征和稳定型冠心病患者使用无聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架的院内和 1 年临床结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2023 Dec 13;2023:8907315. doi: 10.1155/2023/8907315. eCollection 2023.
3
Ultrathin, biodegradable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Final three-year results of the PERFORM-EVER registry.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者使用超薄可生物降解聚合物涂层依维莫司洗脱支架:PERFORM-EVER 注册研究的最终 3 年结果。
Indian Heart J. 2023 Nov-Dec;75(6):469-472. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2023.10.009. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
4
3-Year Clinical Outcomes of Ultrathin Biodegradable Polymer-Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stents: T-Flex Registry With High-Risk Subgroups.超薄可生物降解聚合物涂层西罗莫司洗脱支架的3年临床结果:高风险亚组的T-Flex注册研究
JACC Asia. 2022 Nov 15;2(6):784-785. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.07.004. eCollection 2022 Nov.
5
Twelve months clinical outcomes of ultrathin strut sirolimus-eluting stent in real-world Indian patients with coronary artery disease.超薄支撑西罗莫司洗脱支架在印度冠心病患者中的12个月临床疗效
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Oct 15;12(5):262-271. eCollection 2022.